Monk Bradley J, Tewari Krishnansu S, Dubot Coraline, Caceres M Valeria, Hasegawa Kosei, Shapira-Frommer Ronnie, Salman Pamela, Yañez Eduardo, Gümüş Mahmut, Hurtado de Mendoza Mivael Olivera, Samouëlian Vanessa, Castonguay Vincent, Arkhipov Alexander, Tekin Cumhur, Li Kan, Martin Nguyen Allison, Monberg Matthew J, Colombo Nicoletta, Lorusso Domenica
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, HonorHealth Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Apr;24(4):392-402. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00052-9. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
In the KEYNOTE-826 study, the addition of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab improved overall survival and progression-free survival (primary endpoints) versus placebo plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, with manageable toxicity, in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. In this Article, we report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYNOTE-826.
KEYNOTE-826 is a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial in 151 cancer treatment centres in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy (previous radiosensitising chemotherapy was allowed) and not amenable to curative treatment and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by means of an interactive voice response system in a double-blind manner to receive either pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks intravenously for up to 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m plus cisplatin 50 mg/m or carboplatin area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min, intravenously) with or without bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks intravenously. Randomisation (block size of 4) was stratified by metastatic disease at diagnosis, planned bevacizumab use, and PD-L1 combined positive score. Patients, investigators, and other study personnel involved in study treatment administration or clinical evaluation of patients were unaware of treatment group assignments. PRO instruments were the EORTC Quality-of-Life-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), the EORTC cervical cancer module (QLQ-CX24), and the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level (EQ-5D-5L) visual analogue scale, each collected before treatment at cycles 1-14 and every other cycle thereafter. Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 by investigator review. Change from baseline in QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)-quality of life (QoL) was a prespecified secondary endpoint and was assessed in the PRO full analysis population (all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and completed at least one post-baseline PRO assessment). Other PRO analyses were protocol-specified exploratory endpoints. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03635567, and is ongoing.
Between Nov 20, 2018, and Jan 31, 2020, of 883 patients screened, 617 were randomly assigned (pembrolizumab group, n=308; placebo group, n=309). 587 (95%) of 617 patients received at least one dose of study treatment and completed at least one post-baseline PRO assessment and were therefore included in the PRO analyses (pembrolizumab group, n=290; placebo group, n=297). Median follow-up was 22·0 months (IQR 19·1-24·4). At week 30, QLQ-C30 completion was 199 (69%) of 290 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 168 (57%) of 297 patients in the placebo group; compliance was 199 (94%) of 211 and 168 (90%) of 186, respectively. The least squares mean change in QLQ-C30 GHS-QoL score from baseline to week 30 was -0·3 points (95% CI -3·1 to 2·6) in the pembrolizumab group and -1·3 points (-4·2 to 1·7) in the placebo group, with a between-group difference in least squares mean change of 1·0 point (95% CI -2·7 to 4·7). Median time to true deterioration in GHS-QoL was not reached (NR; 95% CI 13·4 months-NR) in the pembrolizumab group and 12·9 months (6·6-NR) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·84 [95% CI 0·65-1·09]). 122 (42%) of 290 patients in the pembrolizumab group versus 85 (29%) of 297 in the placebo group had improved GHS-QoL at any time during the study (p=0·0003).
Addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab did not negatively affect health-related quality of life. Along with the efficacy and safety results already reported from KEYNOTE-826, these data support the benefit of pembrolizumab and the value of immunotherapy in patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer.
Merck Sharp & Dohme.
在KEYNOTE-826研究中,对于持续性、复发性或转移性宫颈癌患者,在含或不含贝伐单抗的化疗基础上加用抗程序性死亡蛋白1(PD-1)单克隆抗体帕博利珠单抗,与含或不含贝伐单抗的安慰剂加化疗相比,可改善总生存期和无进展生存期(主要终点),且毒性可控。在本文中,我们报告了KEYNOTE-826研究中患者报告的结局(PRO)。
KEYNOTE-826是一项在19个国家的151个癌症治疗中心进行的多中心、随机、3期试验。符合条件的患者年龄在18岁及以上,患有持续性、复发性或转移性宫颈癌,此前未接受过全身化疗(允许既往进行过放疗增敏化疗)且不适合根治性治疗,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0或1。患者通过交互式语音应答系统以1:1的比例进行中央随机分组,采用双盲方式,每3周静脉注射200 mg帕博利珠单抗或安慰剂,最多35个周期,同时接受化疗(紫杉醇175 mg/m²加顺铂50 mg/m²或卡铂曲线下面积5 mg/mL每分钟,静脉注射),含或不含每3周静脉注射15 mg/kg贝伐单抗。随机分组(区组大小为4)根据诊断时的转移性疾病、计划使用的贝伐单抗以及程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)联合阳性评分进行分层。参与研究治疗管理或患者临床评估的患者、研究人员和其他研究人员均不知道治疗组分配情况。PRO工具包括欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷30(QLQ-C30)、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织宫颈癌模块(QLQ-CX24)以及欧洲五维健康量表5级(EQ-5D-5L)视觉模拟量表,均在治疗前第1 - 14周期以及此后的每间隔一个周期收集。主要终点是根据实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.1版由研究者评估的总生存期和无进展生存期。QLQ-C30全球健康状况(GHS)-生活质量(QoL)较基线的变化是预先设定的次要终点,在PRO全分析人群(所有接受至少一剂研究治疗并完成至少一次基线后PRO评估的患者)中进行评估。其他PRO分析是方案指定的探索性终点。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT03635567,目前正在进行中。
在2018年11月20日至2020年1月31日期间,在883例筛选的患者中,617例被随机分组(帕博利珠单抗组,n = 308;安慰剂组,n = 309)。617例患者中的587例(95%)接受了至少一剂研究治疗并完成了至少一次基线后PRO评估,因此被纳入PRO分析(帕博利珠单抗组,n = 290;安慰剂组,n = 297)。中位随访时间为22.0个月(四分位间距19.1 - 24.4个月)。在第30周时,帕博利珠单抗组290例患者中有199例(69%)完成了QLQ-C30问卷,安慰剂组297例患者中有168例(57%)完成;依从性分别为211例中的199例(94%)和186例中的168例(90%)。从基线到第30周,帕博利珠单抗组QLQ-C30 GHS-QoL评分的最小二乘均值变化为 -0.3分(95%置信区间 -3.1至2.6),安慰剂组为 -1.3分(-4.2至1.7),两组最小二乘均值变化的组间差异为1.0分(95%置信区间 -2.7至4.7)。帕博利珠单抗组未达到GHS-QoL真正恶化的中位时间(未达到;95%置信区间13.4个月 - 未达到),安慰剂组为12.9个月(6.6 - 未达到)(风险比0.84 [95%置信区间0.65 - 1.09])。在研究期间的任何时间,帕博利珠单抗组290例患者中有122例(42%)GHS-QoL得到改善,而安慰剂组297例患者中有85例(29%)(p = 0.0003)。
在含或不含贝伐单抗的化疗基础上加用帕博利珠单抗对健康相关生活质量没有负面影响。连同KEYNOTE-826已报告的疗效和安全性结果,这些数据支持帕博利珠单抗对复发性、持续性或转移性宫颈癌患者的益处以及免疫疗法的价值。
默克夏普&多贺美公司。