• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帕博利珠单抗对比安慰剂作为 IIB 期或 IIC 期黑色素瘤(KEYNOTE-716)的辅助治疗:一项多中心、双盲、随机、III 期试验的无远处转移生存结果。

Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): distant metastasis-free survival results of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore & Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2022 Nov;23(11):1378-1388. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00559-9. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00559-9
PMID:36265502
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with stage IIB or IIC melanoma who undergo surgery alone are at a substantial risk for disease recurrence. Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival versus placebo in stage IIB or IIC melanoma in the first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-716 trial. Here, we report results from the secondary endpoint of distant metastasis-free survival (prespecified third interim analysis), and recurrence-free survival with longer follow-up.

METHODS

KEYNOTE-716 is a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover or rechallenge, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 160 academic medical centres and hospitals across 16 countries. Eligible patients were aged 12 years and older with newly-diagnosed, completely resected, and histologically confirmed stage IIB (T3b or T4a) or IIC (T4b) cutaneous melanoma; negative sentinel lymph node biopsy; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 200 mg of pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg up to a maximum of 200 mg in paediatric patients) or placebo, both intravenously, every 3 weeks for 17 cycles (part 1) or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible patients with disease recurrence could receive further treatment with pembrolizumab in the part 2 crossover or rechallenge phase. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system and stratified by T category and paediatric status. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival (assessed here with longer follow-up), and we report the prespecified third interim analysis of distant metastasis-free survival (secondary endpoint). Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who were randomly assigned, according to assigned group) and safety was assessed in all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of trial treatment, according to the treatment received. KEYNOTE-716 is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553836, and has completed recruitment.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 23, 2018, and Nov 4, 2020, 976 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab (n=487) or placebo (n=489). At a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 23·1-31·7), median distant metastasis-free survival was not reached (95% CI not reached [NR]-NR) in either group. Pembrolizumab significantly improved distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·64, 95% CI 0·47-0·88, p=0·0029) versus placebo. Median recurrence-free survival was 37·2 months (95% CI NR-NR) in the pembrolizumab group and not reached in the placebo group (95% CI NR-NR). The risk of recurrence remained lower with pembrolizumab versus placebo (HR 0·64, 95% CI 0·50-0·84). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (16 [3%] of 483 patients in the pembrolizumab group vs 17 [4%] of 486 patients in the placebo group), diarrhoea (eight [2%] vs one [<1%]), rash (seven [1%] vs two [<1%]), autoimmune hepatitis (seven [1%] vs two [<1%]), and increased lipase (six [1%] vs eight [2%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 49 (10%) patients in the pembrolizumab group and 11 (2%) patients in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Adjuvant pembrolizumab is an efficacious treatment option for resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma, with significant improvement in distant-metastasis free survival versus placebo and continued reduction in the risk of recurrence with an adverse event profile consistent with previous studies of pembrolizumab. The overall benefit-risk of pembrolizumab continues to be positive in the adjuvant setting.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

摘要

背景

接受单独手术治疗的 IIB 期或 IIC 期黑色素瘤患者有很大的疾病复发风险。在 KEYNOTE-716 试验的首次中期分析中,与安慰剂相比,辅助 pembrolizumab 显著改善了 IIB 期或 IIC 期黑色素瘤的无复发生存率。在此,我们报告了远处无转移生存期(预先指定的第三次中期分析)的次要终点结果,以及随着随访时间的延长,无复发生存率的结果。

方法

KEYNOTE-716 是一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉或再挑战、随机、III 期试验,在 16 个国家的 160 个学术医疗中心和医院进行。符合条件的患者为年龄在 12 岁及以上、新诊断为完全切除且组织学确认的 IIB(T3b 或 T4a)或 IIC(T4b)皮肤黑色素瘤、前哨淋巴结活检阴性、东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态为 0-1。患者随机分配(1:1)接受 200mg 的 pembrolizumab(2mg/kg,最大剂量为 200mg,适用于儿科患者)或安慰剂,均为静脉注射,每 3 周一次,共 17 个周期(第 1 部分),直至疾病复发或不可接受的毒性。有疾病复发的合格患者可在第 2 部分交叉或再挑战阶段接受进一步的 pembrolizumab 治疗。随机分组使用交互式响应技术系统进行,并按 T 分类和儿科状况分层。主要终点为研究者评估的无复发生存率(在此报告了随着随访时间的延长的结果),我们报告了预先指定的第三次中期分析的远处无转移生存期(次要终点)。疗效分析在按意向治疗人群(所有根据分配组随机分配的患者)进行,安全性根据接受的治疗在所有随机分配并接受至少一剂试验治疗的患者中进行评估。KEYNOTE-716 在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,NCT03553836,现已完成招募。

结果

在 2018 年 9 月 23 日至 2020 年 11 月 4 日期间,976 名患者被随机分配接受 pembrolizumab(n=487)或安慰剂(n=489)。在中位随访 27.4 个月(IQR 23.1-31.7)时,两组均未达到中位远处无转移生存期。与安慰剂相比,pembrolizumab 显著改善了远处无转移生存期(风险比[HR]0.64,95%CI 0.47-0.88,p=0.0029)。pembrolizumab 组的中位无复发生存期为 37.2 个月(95%CI NR-NR),安慰剂组未达到(95%CI NR-NR)。与安慰剂相比,pembrolizumab 组的复发风险仍然较低(HR 0.64,95%CI 0.50-0.84)。最常见的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件是高血压(pembrolizumab 组 483 名患者中有 16 名[3%],安慰剂组 486 名患者中有 17 名[4%])、腹泻(8 名[2%]vs 1 名[<1%])、皮疹(7 名[1%]vs 2 名[<1%])、自身免疫性肝炎(7 名[1%]vs 2 名[<1%])和脂肪酶升高(6 名[1%]vs 8 名[2%])。pembrolizumab 组有 49 名(10%)患者发生与治疗相关的严重不良事件,安慰剂组有 11 名(2%)患者发生与治疗相关的严重不良事件。没有报告与治疗相关的死亡事件。

解释

辅助 pembrolizumab 是一种有效的 IIB 期和 IIC 期黑色素瘤治疗选择,与安慰剂相比,远处无转移生存期显著改善,并且随着复发风险的降低,与 pembrolizumab 先前研究一致的不良反应谱。在辅助治疗环境中,pembrolizumab 的总体获益风险仍然为正。

资金来源

默克公司的子公司默沙东 Sharp & Dohme,Merck & Co.

相似文献

1
Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): distant metastasis-free survival results of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial.帕博利珠单抗对比安慰剂作为 IIB 期或 IIC 期黑色素瘤(KEYNOTE-716)的辅助治疗:一项多中心、双盲、随机、III 期试验的无远处转移生存结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Nov;23(11):1378-1388. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00559-9. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
2
Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.帕博利珠单抗对比安慰剂作为完全切除的IIB期或IIC期黑色素瘤辅助治疗(KEYNOTE-716):一项随机、双盲、3期试验
Lancet. 2022 Apr 30;399(10336):1718-1729. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00562-1. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): distant metastasis-free survival results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.辅助帕博利珠单抗对比安慰剂用于切除的 III 期黑色素瘤(EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054):来自一项双盲、随机、对照、III 期试验的无远处转移生存结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 May;22(5):643-654. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00065-6. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
4
Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091): an interim analysis of a randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial.帕博利珠单抗对比安慰剂作为完全切除的 IB 期-IIIA 期非小细胞肺癌的辅助治疗(PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091):一项随机、三盲、III 期试验的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1274-1286. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00518-6. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
5
Pembrolizumab versus placebo as post-nephrectomy adjuvant therapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-564): 30-month follow-up analysis of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.帕博利珠单抗对比安慰剂用于肾透明细胞癌肾切除术患者的辅助治疗(KEYNOTE-564):一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、III 期临床试验的 30 个月随访分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Sep;23(9):1133-1144. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00487-9.
6
Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): health-related quality-of-life results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.辅助帕博利珠单抗对比安慰剂用于切除的 III 期黑色素瘤(EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054):一项双盲、随机、对照、III 期临床试验的健康相关生活质量结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 May;22(5):655-664. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00081-4. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
7
Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): long-term, health-related quality-of-life results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.辅助帕博利珠单抗对比安慰剂用于切除的 III 期黑色素瘤(EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054):一项双盲、随机、对照、III 期临床试验的长期、与健康相关的生活质量结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2024 Sep;25(9):1202-1212. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00338-3. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
8
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-585): an interim analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 study.新辅助和辅助帕博利珠单抗联合化疗治疗局部晚期胃或胃食管交界癌(KEYNOTE-585):多中心、双盲、随机 3 期研究的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2024 Feb;25(2):212-224. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00541-7. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
9
Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.帕博利珠单抗对比研究者选择的化疗用于伊匹单抗难治性黑色素瘤(KEYNOTE-002):一项随机、对照、2期试验
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):908-18. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00083-2. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
10
Health-related quality of life with pembrolizumab or placebo plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (KEYNOTE-826): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.帕博利珠单抗或安慰剂联合化疗(伴或不伴贝伐单抗)用于持续性、复发性或转移性宫颈癌的健康相关生活质量(KEYNOTE-826):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Apr;24(4):392-402. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00052-9. Epub 2023 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurological adverse events of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials: A meta-analysis.临床试验中PD-1/PD-L1免疫检查点抑制剂的神经学不良事件:一项荟萃分析。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Jul 10;80:100698. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100698.
2
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in Older Patients: An Overview of Published Data.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗老年晚期黑色素瘤:已发表数据概述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 30;17(11):1835. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111835.
3
Spatially organized inflammatory myeloid-CD8 T cell aggregates linked to Merkel-cell Polyomavirus driven Reorganization of the Tumor Microenvironment.
与默克尔细胞多瘤病毒驱动的肿瘤微环境重塑相关的空间组织化炎性髓样细胞-CD8 T细胞聚集体
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 6:2025.06.06.657162. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.06.657162.
4
The Value of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients With Higher-Risk (T3, T4) Primary Cutaneous Melanomas: Insights Provided by a Stage II Risk Calculator.前哨淋巴结活检在高危(T3、T4)原发性皮肤黑色素瘤患者中的价值:II期风险计算器提供的见解
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16699-3.
5
Efficacy of Immunotherapy Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Pleural Mesothelioma: A Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) Study.免疫疗法与化疗在晚期胸膜间皮瘤中的疗效:一项土耳其肿瘤学组(TOG)的研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 31;61(4):638. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040638.
6
Relative expression orderings based prediction of treatment response to Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in advanced melanoma.基于相对表达排序预测晚期黑色素瘤抗程序性死亡蛋白1免疫治疗的反应
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 25;15(1):10235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94931-0.
7
Invasion and metastasis in cancer: molecular insights and therapeutic targets.癌症中的侵袭与转移:分子见解与治疗靶点
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025 Feb 21;10(1):57. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02148-4.
8
Surgical Management of Thick Primary Cutaneous Melanoma in the US.美国原发性厚皮黑色素瘤的手术治疗
Cancer Med. 2025 Feb;14(4):e70578. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70578.
9
MetaAnalysisOnline.com: Web-Based Tool for the Rapid Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Epidemiological Studies.MetaAnalysisOnline.com:用于临床和流行病学研究快速荟萃分析的基于网络的工具。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 6;27:e64016. doi: 10.2196/64016.
10
Real-world pharmacovigilance study of drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis from the FAERS database.基于FAERS数据库的药物性自身免疫性肝炎真实世界药物警戒研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 8;15(1):4783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89272-x.