• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切口疝和腹疝修补的趋势:2001年至2021年的人群分析

Trends in Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair: A Population Analysis From 2001 to 2021.

作者信息

Gillies Madeline, Anthony Lakmali, Al-Roubaie Aymen, Rockliff Aaron, Phong Jenny

机构信息

General Surgery, Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, AUS.

Vascular Surgery, Northern Hospital Epping, Epping, AUS.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Mar 3;15(3):e35744. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35744. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.35744
PMID:36879583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9984720/
Abstract

Background Incisional and ventral hernias are highly prevalent, with primary ventral hernias occurring in approximately 20% of adults and incisional hernias developing in up to 30% of midline abdominal incisions. Recent data from the United States have shown an increasing incidence of elective incisional and ventral hernia repair (IVHR) and emergency repair of complicated hernias. This study examines Australian population trends in IVHR over a two-decade study period. Methods This retrospective study was performed using procedure data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and population data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics captured between 2000 and 2021 to calculate incidence rates per 100,000 population by age and sex for selected subcategories of IVHR operations. Trends over time were evaluated using simple linear regression. Results There were 809,308 IVHR operations performed in Australia during the study period. The cumulative incidence adjusted for population was 182 per 100,000; this increased by 9.578 per year during the study period (95%CI = 8.431-10.726, p<.001). IVHR for primary umbilical hernias experienced the most significant increase in population-adjusted incidence, 1.177 per year (95%CI = 0.654-1.701, p<.001). Emergency IVHR for incarcerated, obstructed, and strangulated hernias increased by 0.576 per year (95%CI = 0.510-0.642, p<.001). Only 20.2% of IVHR procedures were performed as day surgery. Conclusions Australia has seen a significant increase in IVHR operations performed in the last 20 years, particularly those for primary ventral hernias. IVHR for hernias complicated by incarceration, obstruction, and strangulation also increased significantly. The proportion of IVHR operations performed as day surgery is well below the target set by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. With the increasing incidence of IVHR operations and an increasing proportion of these being emergent, elective IVHR should be performed as day surgery when it is safe.

摘要

背景

切口疝和腹疝极为常见,原发性腹疝在约20%的成年人中出现,切口疝在高达30%的腹部中线切口中发生。美国的最新数据显示,择期切口疝和腹疝修补术(IVHR)以及复杂疝的急诊修补术的发病率在上升。本研究调查了澳大利亚在二十年研究期间IVHR的人口趋势。方法:本回顾性研究使用了澳大利亚卫生与福利研究所的手术数据以及澳大利亚统计局2000年至2021年期间收集的人口数据,以计算IVHR手术选定子类按年龄和性别的每10万人发病率。使用简单线性回归评估随时间的趋势。结果:在研究期间,澳大利亚共进行了809,308例IVHR手术。经人口调整后的累积发病率为每10万人182例;在研究期间,这一数字每年增加9.578例(95%置信区间 = 8.431 - 10.726,p <.001)。原发性脐疝的IVHR在经人口调整的发病率方面增长最为显著,每年增加1.177例(95%置信区间 = 0.654 - 1.701,p <.001)。嵌顿、梗阻和绞窄性疝的急诊IVHR每年增加0.576例(95%置信区间 = 0.510 - 0.642,p <.001)。仅20.2%的IVHR手术作为日间手术进行。结论:在过去20年中,澳大利亚的IVHR手术显著增加,尤其是原发性腹疝的手术。因嵌顿、梗阻和绞窄而复杂的疝的IVHR也显著增加。作为日间手术进行的IVHR手术比例远低于澳大利亚皇家外科学院设定的目标。随着IVHR手术发病率的上升以及其中急诊手术比例的增加,在安全的情况下,择期IVHR应作为日间手术进行。

相似文献

1
Trends in Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair: A Population Analysis From 2001 to 2021.切口疝和腹疝修补的趋势:2001年至2021年的人群分析
Cureus. 2023 Mar 3;15(3):e35744. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35744. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
3
National results after ventral hernia repair.腹疝修补术后的全国性结果。
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
4
Trends in emergent hernia repair in the United States.美国急诊疝修补术的趋势。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Mar 1;150(3):194-200. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1242.
5
A Prospective Observational Study of Ventral Hernia.一项关于腹疝的前瞻性观察研究。
Cureus. 2022 Aug 21;14(8):e28240. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28240. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Risk Factors for Incarceration in Patients with Primary Abdominal Wall and Incisional Hernias: A Prospective Study in 4472 Patients.原发性腹壁和切口疝患者入狱的风险因素:4472 例患者的前瞻性研究。
World J Surg. 2019 Aug;43(8):1906-1913. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04989-x.
7
Preliminary results of a two-layered prosthetic repair for recurrent inguinal and ventral hernias combining open and laparoscopic techniques.一种结合开放和腹腔镜技术的两层人工修复复发性腹股沟疝和腹疝的初步结果。
Hernia. 2006 Jun;10(3):253-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-006-0085-3. Epub 2006 Apr 12.
8
Hughes abdominal closure versus standard mass closure to reduce incisional hernias following surgery for colorectal cancer: the HART RCT.Hughes 腹部关闭术与标准质量关闭术在减少结直肠癌手术后切口疝中的比较:HART RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Aug;26(34):1-100. doi: 10.3310/CMWC8368.
9
Emergency laparoscopic and open repair of incarcerated ventral hernias: a multi-institutional comparative analysis with coarsened exact matching.嵌顿性腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜与开放手术紧急修补:粗化精确匹配的多机构比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2812-2820. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6573-6. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
10
Successful management of strangulated incisional hernia in pregnancy - A case report.妊娠期绞窄性切口疝的成功管理——病例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Sep;110:108745. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108745. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Hybrid laparoscopic repair of complex abdominal wall hernias with transabdominal partially extraperitoneal mesh fixation: preliminary results.经腹部分腹膜外补片固定的复杂腹壁疝杂交腹腔镜修补术:初步结果
Front Surg. 2025 Jun 18;12:1575403. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1575403. eCollection 2025.
2
Long term outcomes of laparoscopic transabdominal Retro-Rectus Onlay Mesh (RROM) repair for ventral abdominal wall hernias.腹腔镜经腹直肌后入路补片修补术治疗腹前壁疝的长期疗效
Hernia. 2025 Jun 5;29(1):200. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03387-8.
3
Costing methodologies in robotic ventral hernia repair: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies.欧洲疝学会和美国疝学会更新的腹壁切口缝合指南。
Br J Surg. 2022 Nov 22;109(12):1239-1250. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac302.
2
Trends in Surgical Technique and Outcomes of Ventral Hernia Repair in The United States.美国腹外疝修补手术技术和结果的趋势。
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):274-279. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005654. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
3
Same-day inguinal hernia repair in Australia, 2000-19.2000 - 2019年澳大利亚当日腹股沟疝修补术
机器人腹疝修补术的成本核算方法:一项范围综述
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):182. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03358-z.
4
IPOM versus eTEP as minimally invasive approaches for ventral/incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)与内镜经腹膜前修补术(eTEP)作为腹侧/切口疝的微创治疗方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Apr 14;29(1):144. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03319-6.
5
Is it safe not to fix the mesh in an open incisional hernia repair? Literature review.在开放式切口疝修补术中不固定补片是否安全?文献综述。
BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02894-w.
6
Early postoperative outcomes in a retrospective propensity score-matched comparison of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (r-eTEP) and extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair for ventral hernia.在一项针对腹疝的机器人扩大完全腹膜外修补术(r-eTEP)与扩大完全腹膜外修补术(eTEP)的回顾性倾向评分匹配比较中的早期术后结果。
Hernia. 2025 Mar 12;29(1):119. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03293-z.
7
To drain or not to drain in minimal invasive ventral hernia surgery.微创腹疝手术中是否进行引流
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 11;410(1):97. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03668-x.
8
Comparison of eTEP and IPOM for ventral hernia surgery in the early postoperative period: a retrospective cohort study of a tertiary university centre.对比 eTEP 和 IPOM 在腹疝手术后早期的效果:一所三级大学中心的回顾性队列研究。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2195-2206. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03125-6. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
9
Early Experience with Mesh Suture for DIEP Flap Abdominal Site Closures.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣腹部供区使用网片缝合的早期经验
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Aug 22;12(8):e6095. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006095. eCollection 2024 Aug.
10
Is surgeon annual case volume related with intra and postoperative complications after ventral hernia repair? Uni- and multivariate analysis of prospective registry-based data.外科医生的年手术量与腹疝修补术后的围手术期并发症有关吗?基于前瞻性注册数据库的单因素和多因素分析。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1935-1944. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03129-2. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
Med J Aust. 2022 Apr 4;216(6):303-304. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51410. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
4
Inguinal hernia repair as day-case surgery: a potentially underutilized practice.腹股沟疝修补作为日间手术:一种可能未得到充分利用的做法。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Nov;90(11):2159-2161. doi: 10.1111/ans.16049.
5
Trends in Australian inguinal hernia repair rates: a 15-year population study.澳大利亚腹股沟疝修补率的趋势:一项为期15年的人群研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Nov;90(11):2242-2247. doi: 10.1111/ans.16192. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
6
Risk Factors for Incarceration in Patients with Primary Abdominal Wall and Incisional Hernias: A Prospective Study in 4472 Patients.原发性腹壁和切口疝患者入狱的风险因素:4472 例患者的前瞻性研究。
World J Surg. 2019 Aug;43(8):1906-1913. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04989-x.
7
Effectiveness of Prophylactic Intraperitoneal Mesh Implantation for Prevention of Incisional Hernia in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.预防性腹腔内网片植入预防开放式腹部手术后切口疝的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Feb 1;154(2):109-115. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4221.
8
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery and American Hernia Society consensus guideline on bariatric surgery and hernia surgery.美国代谢与减重外科学会和美国疝外科学会关于减重手术和疝手术的共识指南。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Sep;14(9):1221-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
9
Obesity in Australia.澳大利亚的肥胖问题。
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Jan-Feb;12(1):29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
10
Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.预防性网片覆盖加强与单纯缝合预防中线切口疝的随机对照多中心双盲 2 年随访研究(PRIMA)
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):567-576. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.