Department for General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Oldenburg Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Rahel-Straus-Straße 10, Oldenburg, 26133, Germany.
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg Fakultät VI - Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, Oldenburg, 26129, Germany.
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2195-2206. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03125-6. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
The extended totally extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) is a relatively new laparoscopic approach to address ventral hernias. Since this technique is not widely used yet, the literature regarding its efficacy and safety is limited, especially when compared to more established surgical techniques like intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). This study aimed at contributing to the expanding body of evidence for eTEP, by comparing the early outcomes of eTEP and IPOM surgeries for ventral hernias.
This monocentric, retrospective cohort study compared patients with ventral hernias that were treated with eTEP or IPOM from 2019 to 2023.
A total of 123 patients were analysed. 92 underwent eTEP and 31 IPOM respectively. Both groups were overall comparable. The IPOM group had a higher proportion of incisional hernias (61,29% vs. 21,74%, p < 0,001). This was taken into account for in a subgroup analysis of only primary hernias. The IPOM group had a significantly longer admission time (eTEP: 3 days, IPOM: 4 days, p < 0,001). The subgroup analysis revealed a statistically significant shorter surgery time in IPOM (median of 66,5 min vs. 106,5 min; p = 0,043) and a lower rate of postoperative complications in eTEP (eTEP: 4,17%, IPOM: 25%. p = 0,009). The eTEP group reported lower postoperative pain, yet without statistical significance.
eTEP for ventral hernia repair appears to be non-inferior to IPOM. Compared to IPOM it leads to shorter postoperative hospital stay and a potentially lower complication rate, despite a longer operation time.
扩展完全腹膜外技术(eTEP)是一种相对较新的腹腔镜方法,用于治疗腹疝。由于该技术尚未广泛应用,因此关于其疗效和安全性的文献有限,特别是与更成熟的手术技术(如腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM))相比。本研究旨在通过比较 eTEP 和 IPOM 治疗腹疝的早期结果,为 eTEP 的证据体系增添新的内容。
这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,比较了 2019 年至 2023 年接受 eTEP 或 IPOM 治疗的腹疝患者。
共分析了 123 例患者。92 例行 eTEP,31 例行 IPOM。两组总体上具有可比性。IPOM 组中切口疝的比例更高(61.29%比 21.74%,p<0.001)。这一点在仅对原发性疝的亚组分析中得到了考虑。IPOM 组的住院时间明显更长(eTEP:3 天,IPOM:4 天,p<0.001)。亚组分析显示 IPOM 的手术时间明显缩短(中位数 66.5 分钟比 106.5 分钟;p=0.043),eTEP 的术后并发症发生率较低(eTEP:4.17%,IPOM:25%,p=0.009)。eTEP 组报告的术后疼痛较低,但无统计学意义。
eTEP 用于治疗腹疝似乎与 IPOM 相当。与 IPOM 相比,eTEP 导致术后住院时间更短,潜在并发症发生率更低,尽管手术时间更长。