Intravenous thrombolysis versus antiplatelet therapy in minor stroke patients with large vessel occlusion.

AIM

Our study aimed to explore the effectiveness and safety of intravenous t-PA compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and aspirin alone for minor stroke with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤5 and large vessel occlusion (LVO).

METHODS

Patients with minor stroke harboring LVO within 4.5-h time window were included from the Third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III) between August 2015 and March 2018 in China. Clinical outcomes including modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, recurrent stroke, and all-cause mortality at 90 days and 36-h symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) were collected. Multivariable logistic regression models and propensity score matching analyses were used to determine the association between treatment groups and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1401 minor stroke patients with LVO were included. Overall 251 patients (17.9%) received intravenous t-PA, 722 patients (51.5%) received DAPT, and 428 patients (30.5%) received aspirin alone. The intravenous t-PA was associated with greater proportions of mRS 0-1 (aspirin versus t-PA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.80; p = 0.004; DAPT versus t-PA: aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.19; p = 0.23). Using propensity score matching analyses, the results were similar. There was no difference in 90-day recurrent stroke among the groups. The rates of all-cause mortality in intravenous t-PA, DAPT, and aspirin groups were 0%, 0.55%, 2.34%, respectively. No patient developed sICH within 36 h of intravenous t-PA.

CONCLUSION

In patients with minor stroke harboring LVO within 4.5-h time window, intravenous t-PA was associated with higher odds for the excellent functional outcome, as compared with the aspirin alone. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted.