• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性骨髓瘤中脆弱性评估的重要性:骨髓瘤科学咨询小组向澳大利亚骨髓瘤协会的立场声明。

The importance of frailty assessment in multiple myeloma: a position statement from the Myeloma Scientific Advisory Group to Myeloma Australia.

机构信息

Department of Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2023 May;53(5):819-824. doi: 10.1111/imj.16049. Epub 2023 May 10.

DOI:10.1111/imj.16049
PMID:36880355
Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease of older people, yet factors relating to comorbidity and frailty may threaten treatment tolerability for many of this heterogenous group. There has been increasing interest in defining specific and clinically relevant frailty assessment tools within the MM population, with the goal of using these frailty scores, not just as a prognostic instrument, but also as a predictive tool to allow for a frailty-adapted treatment approach. This paper reviews the various frailty assessment frameworks used in the evaluation of patients with MM, including the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index (IMWG-FI), the Mayo Frailty Index and the simplified frailty scale. While the IMWG-FI remains the most widely accepted tool, the simplified frailty scale is the most user-friendly in busy day-to-day clinics based on its ease of use. This paper summarises the recommendations from the Myeloma Scientific Advisory Group (MSAG) of Myeloma Australia, on the use of frailty assessment tools in clinical practice and proposes a frailty-stratified treatment algorithm to aid clinicians in tailoring therapy for this highly heterogeneous patient population.

摘要

多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种老年疾病,但与合并症和虚弱相关的因素可能会威胁到这一异质性群体中许多人的治疗耐受性。人们越来越关注在 MM 人群中定义特定的、具有临床相关性的虚弱评估工具,其目的是使用这些虚弱评分,不仅作为预后工具,还作为预测工具,以实现基于虚弱程度的治疗方法。本文综述了用于评估 MM 患者的各种虚弱评估框架,包括国际骨髓瘤工作组虚弱指数(IMWG-FI)、梅奥虚弱指数和简化虚弱量表。尽管 IMWG-FI 仍然是最广泛接受的工具,但基于其易用性,简化虚弱量表在繁忙的日常临床中最便于使用。本文总结了澳大利亚骨髓瘤协会骨髓瘤科学咨询小组(MSAG)关于在临床实践中使用虚弱评估工具的建议,并提出了一种基于虚弱程度的治疗算法,以帮助临床医生为这一高度异质性的患者群体量身定制治疗方案。

相似文献

1
The importance of frailty assessment in multiple myeloma: a position statement from the Myeloma Scientific Advisory Group to Myeloma Australia.多发性骨髓瘤中脆弱性评估的重要性:骨髓瘤科学咨询小组向澳大利亚骨髓瘤协会的立场声明。
Intern Med J. 2023 May;53(5):819-824. doi: 10.1111/imj.16049. Epub 2023 May 10.
2
Patient-reported frailty phenotype (PRFP) vs. International Myeloma Working Group frailty index (IMWG FI) proxy: A comparison between two approaches to measuring frailty.患者报告的衰弱表型(PRFP)与国际骨髓瘤工作组衰弱指数(IMWG FI)代理:两种衡量衰弱方法的比较。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Mar;15(2):101681. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101681. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
3
A comparison of three different approaches to defining frailty in older patients with multiple myeloma.三种不同方法用于定义老年多发性骨髓瘤患者虚弱状态的比较。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Mar;11(2):311-315. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
4
Selection determines therapeutic effects: a retrospective analysis of the application of different frailty tools in elderly patients with multiple myeloma.选择决定治疗效果:对老年多发性骨髓瘤患者应用不同衰弱评估工具的回顾性分析
Discov Oncol. 2024 Oct 10;15(1):546. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01305-5.
5
Evaluating concordance between International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score and simplified frailty scale among older adults with multiple myeloma.评估国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)虚弱评分与老年多发性骨髓瘤患者简化虚弱量表之间的一致性。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Nov;15(8):102051. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102051. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
6
Association of IMWG frailty score with health-related quality of life profile of patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma in Italy and the UK: a GIMEMA, multicentre, cross-sectional study.意大利和英国 GIMEMA 多中心、横断面研究:IMWG 虚弱评分与复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者健康相关生活质量特征的相关性。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Sep;3(9):e628-e635. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00172-6.
7
Performance of the International Myeloma Working Group myeloma frailty score among patients 75 and older.75 岁及以上患者中国际骨髓瘤工作组骨髓瘤虚弱评分的表现。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 May;10(3):486-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
8
Elderly patients with multiple myeloma: towards a frailty approach?老年多发性骨髓瘤患者:采用衰弱评估方法?
Curr Opin Oncol. 2017 Sep;29(5):315-321. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000395.
9
Evaluation of the frailty characteristics and clinical outcomes according to the new frailty-based outcome prediction model (Myeloma Risk Profile-MRP) in a UK real-world cohort of elderly newly diagnosed Myeloma patients.根据新的基于虚弱的预后预测模型(Myeloma Risk Profile-MRP)评估英国真实世界老年初诊骨髓瘤患者的虚弱特征和临床结局。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262388. eCollection 2022.
10
Prevalence of geriatric impairments and frailty categorization among real-world patients with multiple myeloma: a prospective cohort study (MFRAIL).真实世界多发性骨髓瘤患者老年综合征和衰弱分类的流行情况:一项前瞻性队列研究(MFRAIL)。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2024 Aug;65(8):1167-1174. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2024.2340052. Epub 2024 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Treatment Landscape for the Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patient: From Quad Regimens to T-Cell Engagers and CAR-T.老年多发性骨髓瘤患者不断演变的治疗格局:从四联方案到T细胞衔接器和嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;17(15):2579. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152579.
2
EHA-EMN Evidence-Based Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma.欧洲血液学年会-欧洲骨髓瘤网络关于多发性骨髓瘤患者诊断、治疗及随访的循证指南
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1038/s41571-025-01041-x.
3
How First-Line Therapy is Changing in non-Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients.
一线治疗在不符合移植条件的多发性骨髓瘤患者中是如何变化的。
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 1;17(1):e2025025. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2025.025. eCollection 2025.
4
Hematological Malignancies in Older Patients: Focus on the Potential Role of a Geriatric Assessment Management.老年患者的血液系统恶性肿瘤:聚焦老年评估管理的潜在作用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 29;14(13):1390. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131390.