United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Poplarville, MS 39470.
Center for Integrated Fungal Research, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Plant Dis. 2023 Oct;107(10):3176-3187. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-21-2751-RE. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
This quantitative review and systematic analysis of the effectiveness of quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) in disinfesting nonfungal plant pathogens in agricultural and horticultural cropping systems is a complementary follow-up to a previous study that evaluated the efficacy of QACs against fungal plant pathogens. In the present study, a meta-analysis involving 67 studies was conducted to assess the overall efficacy of QACs against plant pathogenic bacteria, oomycetes, and viruses and to identify factors associated with observed differences in product efficacy. Across all studies, QACs resulted in a significant ( < 0.0001) reduction in either disease intensity or propagule viability with a mean Hedges' ([Formula: see text]) of 1.75, indicating that overall QAC treatments were moderately effective against nonfungal pathogens. Significant differences in product efficacy were observed between organism types ( = 0.0001), with QAC interventions resulting in higher efficacy ( = 0.0002) against oomycetes ([Formula: see text] = 4.20) than against viruses ([Formula: see text] = 1.42) and bacteria ([Formula: see text] = 1.07), which were not different ( = 0.2689) from each other. As a result, bacterium and virus types were combined into a composite set (BacVir). QAC intervention against BacVir resulted in significant differences in efficacy within categorical moderator subgroups for genus ( = 0.0133), target material ( = 0.0001), and QAC product generation ( = 0.0281). QAC intervention against oomycetes resulted in significant differences in efficacy only for genus ( < 0.0001). For the BacVir composite, five random effect (RE) meta-regression models were significant ( = 0.05), where models with dose and time, dose and genus, time and genus, dose and target, and time and target accounted for 62, 61, 52, 83, and 88%, respectively, of the variance in true effect sizes () associated with [Formula: see text]. For oomycetes, three RE meta-regression models were significant ( = 0.05), where models with dose and time, dose and genus, and time and genus accounted for 64, 86, and 90%, respectively, of associated with [Formula: see text]. These results show that while QACs are moderately effective against nonfungal plant pathogens, the observed variability in their efficacy due to dose of active ingredient and contact time of these products can be influenced by organism type, genus within organism type, the target being treated, and the generation of QAC products.
本研究对季铵盐化合物(QACs)在农业和园艺作物系统中消灭非真菌植物病原体的效果进行了定量综述和系统分析,是对先前评估 QACs 对真菌植物病原体功效的研究的补充。在本研究中,进行了一项涉及 67 项研究的荟萃分析,以评估 QAC 对植物病原菌、卵菌和病毒的总体功效,并确定与观察到的产品功效差异相关的因素。在所有研究中,QAC 处理导致疾病强度或繁殖体活力显著降低(<0.0001),Hedges' ([Formula: see text])均值为 1.75,表明 QAC 处理总体上对非真菌病原体具有中等功效。由于生物体类型(=0.0001)的差异,产品功效存在显著差异,QAC 干预对卵菌([Formula: see text] = 4.20)的效果高于病毒([Formula: see text] = 1.42)和细菌([Formula: see text] = 1.07),而病毒和细菌之间没有差异(=0.2689)。因此,细菌和病毒类型被合并为一个组合集(BacVir)。QAC 对 BacVir 的干预在分类调节子亚组内对属(=0.0133)、目标材料(=0.0001)和 QAC 产品生成(=0.0281)有显著差异。QAC 对卵菌的干预仅对属有显著差异(<0.0001)。对于 BacVir 组合,五个随机效应(RE)元回归模型具有统计学意义(=0.05),其中剂量和时间、剂量和属、时间和属、剂量和目标以及时间和目标模型分别解释了与 [Formula: see text] 相关的真实效应大小()方差的 62%、61%、52%、83%和 88%。对于卵菌,三个 RE 元回归模型具有统计学意义(=0.05),其中剂量和时间、剂量和属以及时间和属模型分别解释了与 [Formula: see text] 相关的方差的 64%、86%和 90%。这些结果表明,虽然 QACs 对非真菌植物病原体具有中等功效,但由于这些产品的有效成分剂量和接触时间的变化,其功效的可变性可能受到生物体类型、生物体类型内的属、目标物以及 QAC 产品的生成的影响。