• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童旋转、旋转和往复式器械对减少乳磨牙细菌负荷的效果:一项比较研究。

Effectiveness of pediatric rotary, rotary and reciprocating instrumentations on bacterial load reduction in primary molars: an comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, 32040, Isparta, Turkey.

Kartal Oral and Health Center, 34880, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Mar;47(2):30-39. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.009. Epub 2023 Mar 3.

DOI:10.22514/jocpd.2023.009
PMID:36890740
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intracanal reduction using pediatric rotary (EndoArt Pedo Kit Blue, EasyInSmile X-Baby and Denco Kids), rotary (ProTaper Next) and reciprocating (WaveOne Gold) file systems through microbiological analyses in primary molars. Seventy-five mandibular primary second molars were selected and divided into five instrumentation groups and a negative control group. After incubation, five roots were used to confirm biofilm formation on the root canals. Before and after instrumentation, bacterial samples were collected. The bacterial load reduction was statistically analyzed by using Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn post hoc tests at a significance level of 0.05. Denco Kids and EndoArt Pedo Kit Blue promoted higher bacterial reduction than EasyInSmile X-Baby systems. There was no difference in bacterial reduction between ProTaper Next rotary file systems and other groups. Among the single-file techniques, instrumentation with the Denco Kids rotary system showed a more significant bacterial load reduction than WaveOne Gold ( < 0.05). All systems used in the study reduced bacterial counts from root canals in primary teeth. Further studies are required to generate more information about the use of pediatric rotary file systems in clinics.

摘要

本研究旨在通过微生物分析评估儿童旋转(EndoArt Pedo Kit Blue、EasyInSmile X-Baby 和 Denco Kids)、旋转(ProTaper Next)和往复(WaveOne Gold)锉系统在乳磨牙根管内减少的疗效。选择 75 颗下颌第二乳磨牙,分为 5 个器械组和一个阴性对照组。孵育后,用 5 个根来确认根管内生物膜的形成。在器械预备前后,采集细菌样本。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Dunn 事后检验,以 0.05 的显著性水平对细菌减少量进行统计学分析。Denco Kids 和 EndoArt Pedo Kit Blue 比 EasyInSmile X-Baby 系统促进了更高的细菌减少。ProTaper Next 旋转锉系统与其他组之间的细菌减少量无差异。在单锉技术中,与 WaveOne Gold 相比,Denco Kids 旋转锉系统的器械使用显示出更显著的细菌负荷减少(<0.05)。研究中使用的所有系统均减少了乳牙根管中的细菌计数。需要进一步的研究来提供更多关于在临床中使用儿童旋转锉系统的信息。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of pediatric rotary, rotary and reciprocating instrumentations on bacterial load reduction in primary molars: an comparative study.儿童旋转、旋转和往复式器械对减少乳磨牙细菌负荷的效果:一项比较研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Mar;47(2):30-39. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.009. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
2
Mechanical reduction in intracanal Enterococcus faecalis when using three different single-file systems: an ex vivo comparative study.三种不同单根锉系统在根管内粪肠球菌机械减少量方面的比较:一项离体研究。
Int Endod J. 2019 Jan;52(1):77-85. doi: 10.1111/iej.12984. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
3
Influence of reciprocating single-file and rotary instrumentation on bacterial reduction on infected root canals.往复式单根锉和旋转器械预备对感染根管内细菌减少的影响
Int Endod J. 2013 Nov;46(11):1083-7. doi: 10.1111/iej.12108. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
4
Comparative Analysis of Protaper and Waveone Systems to Reduce Enterococcus Faecalis from Root Canal System in Primary Molars--An in Vitro Study.ProTaper和WaveOne系统减少乳磨牙根管系统中粪肠球菌的比较分析——一项体外研究
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):124-8. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.124.
5
Ex vivo evaluation of various instrumentation techniques and irrigants in reducing E. faecalis within root canals.不同根管预备技术和冲洗剂对减少根管内粪肠球菌的体外评估
Int Endod J. 2013 Sep;46(9):823-30. doi: 10.1111/iej.12067. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
6
Reduction in Enteroccocus faecalis counts - a comparison between rotary and reciprocating systems.粪肠球菌数量的减少——旋转系统与往复系统的比较
Int Endod J. 2014 Apr;47(4):380-6. doi: 10.1111/iej.12158. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
7
Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.不同导丝路径锉对弯曲根管内根尖碎屑推出的影响。
J Endod. 2018 Jul;44(7):1191-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
8
Mechanical reduction of the intracanal Enterococcus faecalis population by Hyflex CM, K3XF, ProTaper Next, and two manual instrument systems: an in vitro comparative study.Hyflex CM、K3XF、ProTaper Next和两种手动器械系统对根管内粪肠球菌数量的机械减少作用:一项体外比较研究。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2016 May;7(2):168-73. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12136. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
9
Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems for removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria from primarily infected root canals.单根往复系统与旋转系统在去除初染根管内内毒素和可培养细菌有效性方面的临床比较
J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):625-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
10
Comparison of two pediatric rotary file systems and hand instrumentation in primary molar: An ex vivo cone-beam computed tomographic study.两种儿童旋转锉系统与手动器械在乳磨牙根管治疗中应用的比较:一项离体锥形束 CT 研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;24(10):1492-1498. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_563_20.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Rotary Endodontic Files in Primary Teeth (2000-2025): A Scoping Review of Design, Evidence, and Clinical Use.乳牙用儿童旋转根管锉(2000 - 2025年):设计、证据及临床应用的范围综述
Cureus. 2025 Jun 11;17(6):e85775. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85775. eCollection 2025 Jun.