Farmer A E, Katz R, McGuffin P, Bebbington P
Institute of Psychiatry, London.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Dec;44(12):1064-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800240038006.
Item-by-item interrater agreement, CATEGO syndrome and class agreement, and agreement for Index of Definition were compared for the Present State Examination (PSE) and for the PSE items included in the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Both interviews were given to 30 subjects representing a wide range of diagnoses, including hospitalized psychotic patients and outpatients with milder neurotic symptoms. Although agreement over individual questions was disappointing, when broader issues, such as syndrome classification, diagnostic class, and severity, were considered, agreement between interviews attained statistical significance.
针对《现况检查》（PSE）以及《综合国际诊断访谈》中包含的PSE项目，比较了逐项评定者间一致性、CATEGO综合征与类别一致性以及定义指数的一致性。两项访谈均对30名代表广泛诊断范围的受试者进行，包括住院精神病患者和有较轻神经症症状的门诊患者。尽管对单个问题的一致性令人失望，但当考虑更广泛的问题，如综合征分类、诊断类别和严重程度时，访谈之间的一致性达到了统计学显著性。
