• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A SCAN-SADS comparison study of psychotic subjects and their first-degree relatives.

作者信息

Farmer A, Cosyns P, Leboyer M, Maier W, Mors O, Sargeant M, Bebbington P, McGuffin P

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993;242(6):352-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02190248.

DOI:10.1007/BF02190248
PMID:8323985
Abstract

Two diagnostic interviews, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (lifetime version) (SADS-LA) and the Schedule for the Clinical Assessment of Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) were compared for main diagnoses and for their acceptibility to psychotic subjects and their psychiatrically well relatives. Broad agreement for DSM-III, DSM-III-R and draft ICD-10 diagnoses was good, although there were areas of disagreement between the two interviews which are discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
A SCAN-SADS comparison study of psychotic subjects and their first-degree relatives.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993;242(6):352-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02190248.
2
Examining the validity of DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder and its putative subtypes in the Roscommon Family Study.在罗斯康芒家族研究中检验《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版（DSM-III-R）精神分裂症性情感障碍及其假定亚型的有效性。
Am J Psychiatry. 1995 May;152(5):755-64. doi: 10.1176/ajp.152.5.755.
3
A family study of DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, compared with schizophrenia and psychotic and nonpsychotic major depression.一项关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版（DSM-III-R）中分裂情感性障碍抑郁型的家族研究，与精神分裂症、精神病性及非精神病性重度抑郁症的比较。
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 May;148(5):612-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.5.612.
4
The reliability of the SADS-LA in a family study setting.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991;241(3):165-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02219716.
5
Schizoaffective disorder and affective disorders with mood-incongruent psychotic features: keep separate or combine? Evidence from a family study.精神分裂症伴情感障碍及具有心境不协调精神病性特征的情感障碍：分开还是合并？来自一项家系研究的证据。
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;149(12):1666-73. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.12.1666.
6
Psychogenic (reactive) and hysterical psychoses: a cross-system reliability study.心因性（反应性）与癔症性精神病：一项跨系统可靠性研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Feb;95(2):112-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb00383.x.
7
Testing the comparability of psychiatric diagnoses in ICD-10 and DSM-III-R.测试《国际疾病分类第10版》（ICD - 10）与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》（DSM - III - R）中精神疾病诊断的可比性。
Psychopathology. 1994;27(1-2):19-28. doi: 10.1159/000284844.
8
A comparison of the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R and clinical diagnoses.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本结构化临床访谈与临床诊断的比较
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1995 Jun;183(6):365-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199506000-00003.
9
Validity of the family history method for diagnosing schizophrenia, schizophrenia-related psychoses, and schizophrenia-spectrum personality disorders in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia probands.家族史方法在精神分裂症先证者一级亲属中诊断精神分裂症、精神分裂症相关精神病及精神分裂症谱系人格障碍的有效性。
Schizophr Res. 2004 Jun 1;68(2-3):309-17. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00081-1.
10
An empirical comparison of diagnoses and reliabilities in ICD-10 and DSM-III-R.ICD - 10与DSM - III - R中诊断及可靠性的实证比较。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993;242(4):209-17. doi: 10.1007/BF02189965.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of lifetime diagnoses and symptoms in patients with a current psychiatric disorder.当前患有精神疾病患者终生诊断和症状的可靠性。
J Psychiatr Res. 1981;16(4):229-40. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(81)90017-0.
2
Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia--Lifetime Version modified for the study of anxiety disorders (SADS-LA): rationale and conceptual development.情感障碍与精神分裂症量表——为焦虑症研究修改的终生版（SADS-LA）：原理与概念发展
J Psychiatr Res. 1986;20(4):317-25. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(86)90034-8.
3
A comparison between the Present State Examination and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.
现况检查与复合国际诊断访谈之间的比较。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Dec;44(12):1064-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800240038006.
4
The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. An epidemiologic Instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures.《综合国际诊断访谈》。一种适用于与不同诊断系统结合使用并在不同文化背景下使用的流行病学工具。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Dec;45(12):1069-77. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800360017003.
5
SCAN. Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990 Jun;47(6):589-93. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810180089012.
6
A polydiagnostic application of operational criteria in studies of psychotic illness. Development and reliability of the OPCRIT system.精神病性疾病研究中操作标准的多诊断应用。OPCRIT系统的开发与可靠性。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Aug;48(8):764-70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810320088015.
7
A diagnostic interview: the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia.一次诊断性访谈：情感障碍与精神分裂症日程表。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978 Jul;35(7):837-44. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770310043002.
8
Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability.研究诊断标准：基本原理与可靠性。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978 Jun;35(6):773-82. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770300115013.