Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Unesco Chair "Anthropology of Health - Biosphere and Healing System", University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
J Prev Med Hyg. 2022 Dec 31;63(4):E625-E629. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.4.2781. eCollection 2022 Dec.
With the recent COVID-19 pandemic, the terms quarantine, contagion and infection have again become part of our everyday speech, prompting historians to reflect on the settings in which they were originally used and to make comparisons with the present time. How did people cope with epidemics in the past? What measures were taken?
Here, we analyse the institutional response of the Republic of Genoa to a calamity that shook the city - the plague of 1656-1657. In doing so, we focus particularly on the public health measures implemented, as recorded also in unpublished and archival documents.
In order to tighten control over the population, Genoa was divided into 20 zones, each of which was placed under the authority of a Commissioner endowed with criminal jurisdiction. The Commissioners' duties concerned the spheres of public health, public order and those tasks which today we would assign to "civil protection". Through the official documentation and the trial records kept by the Chancellor of one of these zones, we can shed light on the Commissioners' everyday activities and assess the impact of the public health measures on the population.
The 17 century plague in Genoa provides us with an important testimony of a well-organised and structured public health policy - an institutional response involving the adoption of efficacious measures of safety and prevention in the field of hygiene and public health. From the historical-social, normative and public health perspectives, this meaningful experience highlights the organisation of a large port city, which was at the time a flourishing commercial and financial hub.
随着最近 COVID-19 大流行的爆发,检疫、传染和感染等术语再次成为我们日常用语的一部分,促使历史学家反思这些术语最初使用的背景,并将其与当前情况进行比较。过去人们是如何应对流行病的?采取了哪些措施?
在这里,我们分析了热那亚共和国对一场震撼城市的灾难——1656-1657 年的瘟疫——的制度反应。在这样做的过程中,我们特别关注所实施的公共卫生措施,这些措施也记录在未发表和档案文件中。
为了加强对人口的控制,热那亚被分为 20 个区,每个区都由一名拥有刑事管辖权的专员负责。专员的职责涉及公共卫生、公共秩序以及我们今天将分配给“民防”的任务。通过官方文件和其中一个区的大法官保存的审判记录,我们可以了解专员的日常活动,并评估公共卫生措施对人口的影响。
17 世纪热那亚的瘟疫为我们提供了一个组织良好、结构完善的公共卫生政策的重要见证——这是一种制度反应,涉及在卫生和公共卫生领域采取有效安全和预防措施。从历史社会、规范和公共卫生的角度来看,这一有意义的经验突显了一个大型港口城市的组织,当时它是一个繁荣的商业和金融中心。