Collins Kathryn, Dopheide Julie A, Wang Mengxi, Keshishian Talene
PGY2 Psychiatric Pharmacy Resident, University of Southern California School of Pharmacy, Los Angeles, California.
(Corresponding author) Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, Psychiatry, and the Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California School of Pharmacy and Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California,
Ment Health Clin. 2023 Mar 3;13(1):11-17. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2023.02.011. eCollection 2023 Feb.
Psychotropic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) contribute to adverse drug events, but many go undetected or unmanaged. Thorough documentation of potential DDIs can improve patient safety. The primary objective of this study is to determine the quality of and factors associated with documentation of DDIs in an adult psychiatric clinic run by postgraduate year 3 psychiatry residents (PGY3s).
A list of high-alert psychotropic medications was identified by consulting primary literature on DDIs and clinic records. Charts of patients prescribed these medications by PGY3 residents from July 2021 to March 2022 were reviewed to detect potential DDIs and assess documentation. Chart documentation of DDIs was noted as none, partial, or complete.
Chart review identified 146 DDIs among 129 patients. Among the 146 DDIs, 65% were not documented, 24% were partially documented, and 11% had complete documentation. The percentage of pharmacodynamic interactions documented was 68.6% with 35.3% of pharmacokinetic interactions documented. Factors associated with partial or complete documentation included diagnosis of psychotic disorder ( = .003), treatment with clozapine ( = .02), treatment with benzodiazepine-receptor agonist ( < .01), and assumption of care during July ( = .04). Factors associated with no documentation include diagnosis of "other (primarily impulse control disorder)" ( < .01) and taking an enzyme-inhibiting antidepressant ( < .01).
Investigators propose best practices for psychotropic DDI documentation: (1) description and potential outcome of DDI, (2) monitoring and management, (3) Patient education on DDI, and (4) patient response to DDI education. Strategies to improve DDI documentation quality include targeted provider education, incentives, and electronic medical record "DDI smart phrases."
精神药物-药物相互作用(DDIs)会导致药物不良事件,但许多此类相互作用未被发现或未得到妥善处理。对潜在的药物相互作用进行全面记录可提高患者安全性。本研究的主要目的是确定由三年级精神病学住院医师(PGY3)管理的成人精神病诊所中药物相互作用记录的质量及相关因素。
通过查阅关于药物相互作用的主要文献和临床记录,确定了一份高警示精神药物清单。对2021年7月至2022年3月由PGY3住院医师开具这些药物的患者病历进行审查,以检测潜在的药物相互作用并评估记录情况。药物相互作用的病历记录被标记为无、部分或完整。
病历审查在129名患者中发现了146例药物相互作用。在这146例药物相互作用中,65%未被记录,24%被部分记录,11%有完整记录。记录的药效学相互作用的百分比为68.6%,药代动力学相互作用的记录比例为35.3%。与部分或完整记录相关的因素包括精神障碍诊断(P = 0.003)、使用氯氮平治疗(P = 0.02)、使用苯二氮䓬受体激动剂治疗(P < 0.01)以及在7月承担护理工作(P = 0.04)。与无记录相关的因素包括诊断为“其他(主要是冲动控制障碍)”(P < 0.01)和服用酶抑制性抗抑郁药(P < 0.01)。
研究人员提出了精神药物相互作用记录的最佳实践:(1)药物相互作用的描述和潜在结果,(2)监测和管理,(3)对患者进行药物相互作用教育,以及(4)患者对药物相互作用教育的反应。提高药物相互作用记录质量的策略包括有针对性的提供者教育、激励措施以及电子病历“药物相互作用智能短语”。