• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Computerized Version of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (KSADS-COMP): Development and Validation of the Korean Clinician-Administered Version.《学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症儿童版量表计算机化版本(KSADS-COMP):韩国临床医生实施版本的开发与验证》
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Feb;20(2):174-179. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0273. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
2
Validation of the Korean self-administered computerized versions of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children (KSADS-COMP).韩国学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症儿童版自评计算机化版本(KSADS-COMP)的验证。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2023 Mar;81:103422. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103422. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
3
Development of Three Web-Based Computerized Versions of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Child Psychiatric Diagnostic Interview: Preliminary Validity Data.《用于情感障碍和精神分裂症的儿童精神病学诊断访谈的 Kiddie 时间表的三个基于网络的计算机化版本的开发:初步有效性数据》
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;59(2):309-325. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 18.
4
[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].[儿童和青少年精神病学中的诊断性结构化访谈]
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.
5
The reliability and validity of Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version- Korean version (K-SADS-PL-K).儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表-目前及终生版-韩语版(K-SADS-PL-K)的信度和效度。
Yonsei Med J. 2004 Feb 29;45(1):81-9. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.1.81.
6
KSADS-COMP Perspectives on Child Psychiatric Diagnostic Assessment and Treatment Planning.KSADS-COMP 儿童精神疾病诊断评估和治疗计划透视。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 May;60(5):540-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.470. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
7
Reliability of the Washington University in St. Louis Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (WASH-U-KSADS) mania and rapid cycling sections.圣路易斯华盛顿大学儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表(WASH-U-KSADS)中躁狂和快速循环部分的信度。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Apr;40(4):450-5. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200104000-00014.
8
The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) for DSM-5: A validation for neurodevelopmental disorders in Japanese outpatients.《用于 DSM-5 的情感障碍和精神分裂症现患和终生版本的 Kiddie 时间表(K-SADS-PL):日本门诊患者神经发育障碍的验证》。
Compr Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;96:152148. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152148. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
9
Psychometrics of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia present and lifetime version for DSM-5 in Japanese outpatients.《用于 DSM-5 的儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症现患及终生版本 Kiddie 时间表的心理测量学:日本门诊患者》
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2023 Dec;32(4):e1957. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1957. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
10
Psychometric properties of the Farsi translation of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version.《儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表(目前及终生版)》波斯语翻译版的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2006 Mar 15;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-10.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Detection and Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Why Is It So Difficult?自闭症谱系障碍的早期检测和诊断:为什么如此困难?
Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2020 Oct;35:100831. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2020.100831. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
Development of Three Web-Based Computerized Versions of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Child Psychiatric Diagnostic Interview: Preliminary Validity Data.《用于情感障碍和精神分裂症的儿童精神病学诊断访谈的 Kiddie 时间表的三个基于网络的计算机化版本的开发:初步有效性数据》
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;59(2):309-325. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 18.
3
Validation of the NetSCID: an automated web-based adaptive version of the SCID.NetSCID的验证:一种基于网络的自动化适应性版SCID。
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;66:67-70. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
4
A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples.科恩氏 κ系数与格瓦特氏 AC1 系数在计算评定者间信度系数时的比较:一项对人格障碍样本进行的研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Apr 29;13:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-61.
5
Diagnostic procedures in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic literature review.自闭症谱系障碍的诊断程序:系统文献回顾。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;22(6):329-40. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0375-0. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
6
Specific phobia in youth: phenomenology and psychological characteristics.青少年特定恐惧症:现象学和心理特征。
Behav Ther. 2010 Mar;41(1):133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
7
The reliability and validity of Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version- Korean version (K-SADS-PL-K).儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表-目前及终生版-韩语版(K-SADS-PL-K)的信度和效度。
Yonsei Med J. 2004 Feb 29;45(1):81-9. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.1.81.
8
A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders.一项用于识别精神障碍的计算机辅助电话访谈。
JAMA. 1997 Sep 17;278(11):905-10.
9
Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data.学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表-目前和终生版(K-SADS-PL):初始信度和效度数据。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;36(7):980-8. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021.

《学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症儿童版量表计算机化版本(KSADS-COMP):韩国临床医生实施版本的开发与验证》

Computerized Version of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (KSADS-COMP): Development and Validation of the Korean Clinician-Administered Version.

作者信息

Lee Jeewon, Kim Seong-Ju, Kim Dohyung, Yang Su-Jin, Lee Sangha, Lee Areum, Shin Yunmi

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Feb;20(2):174-179. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0273. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

DOI:10.30773/pi.2022.0273
PMID:36891602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9996142/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate the Korean version of the clinician-administered KSADSCOMP, which is the recently updated, web-based computerized version of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for school-age children (KSADS).

METHODS

A total of 71 participants (mean age=12.04±3.86 years, female=29.57%) participated in the study. A child-adolescent psychiatrist established a diagnosis for the participant after a thorough psychiatric interview with the participant and the parent. Researchers who were blind to the diagnoses administered the clinician-administered KSADS-COMP to the parents and participants. The gold-standard diagnoses made by child-adolescent psychiatrists were compared to the current diagnoses generated by the clinician-administered KSADS-COMP. Percent agreement, Cohen's Kappa, Gwet's first-order agreement coefficient (AC1), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated.

RESULTS

Gwet's AC1, our preferred measure of agreement, showed excellent range between 0.78 and 1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value and negative predictive value also showed high scores.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated excellent criterion validity of the Korean version of the clinician-administered KSADSCOMP, though the small sample size could be a limitation. The current study was the first study to examine the criterion validity of the KSADS-COMP. Due to its readily usable format and efficient and accurate diagnostic process, widely-use of KSADS-COMP is expected.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发并验证韩国版的临床医生实施的KSADS-COMP,它是最近更新的、基于网络的学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症儿童版量表(KSADS)的计算机化版本。

方法

共有71名参与者(平均年龄=12.04±3.86岁,女性占29.57%)参与了该研究。一名儿童青少年精神科医生在对参与者及其父母进行全面的精神科访谈后为参与者做出诊断。对诊断不知情的研究人员向父母和参与者实施临床医生实施的KSADS-COMP。将儿童青少年精神科医生做出的金标准诊断与临床医生实施的KSADS-COMP生成的当前诊断进行比较。计算一致性百分比、科恩kappa系数、格韦特一阶一致性系数(AC1)、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。

结果

格韦特的AC1是我们首选的一致性测量指标,显示出在0.78至1之间的优异范围。敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值也显示出高分。

结论

当前研究证明了韩国版临床医生实施的KSADS-COMP具有出色的效标效度,尽管小样本量可能是一个局限性。当前研究是第一项检验KSADS-COMP效标效度的研究。由于其易于使用的格式以及高效准确的诊断过程,预计KSADS-COMP将得到广泛应用。