Hannah Nicholas, Vasic Dubravka, Kansal Abhik, Al-Ani Aysha, Hebbard Geoff, Sood Siddharth
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2023 Nov;53(11):2057-2064. doi: 10.1111/imj.16053. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
Hepatic encephalopathy is a confusional state associated with cirrhosis. Serum ammonia levels are neither sensitive nor specific for the diagnosis.
We audited the ordering location and hospital unit whilst assessing the impact on management at a major Australian tertiary centre.
We conducted a single-centre retrospective chart review of the ordering of serum ammonia levels between 1 March 2019 and 29 February 2020 at The Royal Melbourne Hospital, a tertiary-referral centre in Melbourne, Victoria. Demographic, medication and pathology results, including serum ammonia measurements, were collected. The main outcomes assessed were ordering location, sensitivity, specificity and impact on management.
A total of 1007 serum ammonia tests were ordered in 425 patients. Nearly all ammonia ordering was by non-gastroenterologists, 24.2% by the intensive care unit, 23.1% by general medicine and 19.5% by the emergency department (ED). Only 21.6% of patients had a history of cirrhosis, with hepatic encephalopathy diagnosed in 13.6%. On subgroup analysis, 217 ammonia tests were performed in 92 patients with cirrhosis. Cirrhotic patients were older (64 vs 59 years, P = 0.012) and had higher median ammonia levels (64.46 vs 59 μmol/L, P < 0.001) compared with non-cirrhotic patients. In cirrhotic patients, the sensitivity and specificity for serum ammonia and diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy were 75% and 52.3% respectively.
We affirm the poor utility of serum ammonia levels for guiding management of hepatic encephalopathy within the Australian context. ED and general medical units account for the majority of test ordering within the hospital. Understanding where ordering occurs provides a target for targeted education.
肝性脑病是一种与肝硬化相关的意识混乱状态。血清氨水平对诊断既不敏感也不具有特异性。
我们在澳大利亚一家大型三级医疗中心评估血清氨水平检测对管理的影响时,审核了检测申请地点和医院科室。
我们对墨尔本皇家医院(维多利亚州墨尔本的一家三级转诊中心)2019年3月1日至2020年2月29日期间血清氨水平检测申请进行了单中心回顾性病历审查。收集了人口统计学、用药及病理检查结果,包括血清氨检测结果。评估的主要结果包括检测申请地点、敏感性、特异性以及对管理的影响。
425例患者共进行了1007次血清氨检测。几乎所有氨检测申请均由非胃肠病学医生提出,重症监护病房占24.2% ,普通内科占23.1%,急诊科占19.5%。仅有21.6%的患者有肝硬化病史,其中13.6%被诊断为肝性脑病。亚组分析显示,92例肝硬化患者进行了217次氨检测。与非肝硬化患者相比,肝硬化患者年龄更大(64岁对59岁,P = 0.012),氨水平中位数更高(64.46对59 μmol/L,P < 0.001)。在肝硬化患者中,血清氨检测对肝性脑病诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和52.3%。
我们证实,在澳大利亚的背景下,血清氨水平对指导肝性脑病的管理作用不大。急诊科和普通内科科室占医院内大多数检测申请。了解检测申请的发生地点可为针对性教育提供目标。