Killu Ammar M, Yang Mei, Naksuk Niyada, Tri Jason, Li Xuping, Asirvatham Roshini, Asirvatham Samuel J, Cha Yong-Mei
Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Department of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, 1665 Kongjiang Rd, Yangpu Qu, Shanghai Shi, 200000, China.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Mar;68(2):219-231. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01516-w. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the leading cause of syncope. The most frequent mechanism is that of a cardioinhibitory response, vasodepressor response, or mixture of both. Neural stimulation that negates or overcomes the effects of vagal tone may be used as a treatment strategy for VVS.
Six male canines were studied. Stimulation (10-Hz, 2 ms pulse duration, 2 min duration) of the cervical vagus (CV), thoracic vagus (TV), and stellate ganglia (SG) was performed using needle electrodes at 3 V, 5 V, and 10 V output. SG stimulation at an output of 10 V overlaying TV stimulation at the same output was performed. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and cardiac output (CO) were measured before, during, and after stimulation.
Right cervical vagal stimulation was associated with significant hemodynamic changes. HR, SBP, and DBP were reduced (107 ± 16 vs. 78 ± 15 bpm [P < 0.0001], 116 ± 24 vs. 107 ± 28 mmHg [P = 0.002] and 71 ± 18 vs. 58 ± 20 mmHg [P < 0.0001]), respectively, while left cervical vagal stimulation had minimal changes. CV stimulation was associated with greater hemodynamic changes than TV stimulation. Left and right SG stimulation significantly increased systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and HR at 5 V and 10 V, which could be observed within 30 s after stimulation. An output-dependent increase in hemodynamic parameters was seen with both left and right SG stimulation. No difference between left and right SG stimulation was seen. SG stimulation overlay significantly increased HR, BP, and CO from baseline vagal stimulation bilaterally.
Stellate ganglia stimulation leads to increased HR and BP despite significant vagal stimulation. This may be exploited therapeutically in the management of vasovagal syncope.
血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)是晕厥的主要原因。最常见的机制是心脏抑制反应、血管减压反应或两者混合。消除或克服迷走神经张力影响的神经刺激可作为VVS的一种治疗策略。
对6只雄性犬进行研究。使用针电极以3V、5V和10V的输出对颈迷走神经(CV)、胸迷走神经(TV)和星状神经节(SG)进行刺激(10Hz,脉冲持续时间2ms,持续时间2分钟)。在10V输出下进行星状神经节刺激并叠加相同输出下的胸迷走神经刺激。在刺激前、刺激期间和刺激后测量心率(HR)、血压(BP)和心输出量(CO)。
右侧颈迷走神经刺激与显著的血流动力学变化相关。心率、收缩压和舒张压分别降低(107±16对78±15次/分钟[P<0.0001],116±24对107±28mmHg[P=0.002],71±18对58±20mmHg[P<0.0001]),而左侧颈迷走神经刺激变化最小。颈迷走神经刺激比胸迷走神经刺激引起的血流动力学变化更大。左侧和右侧星状神经节刺激在5V和10V时显著增加收缩压、舒张压和心率,在刺激后30秒内即可观察到。左侧和右侧星状神经节刺激均出现血流动力学参数随输出增加的情况。左侧和右侧星状神经节刺激之间无差异。双侧星状神经节叠加刺激比基线迷走神经刺激显著增加心率、血压和心输出量。
尽管存在显著的迷走神经刺激,星状神经节刺激仍会导致心率和血压升高。这在血管迷走性晕厥的治疗中可能具有治疗价值。