Haruki Shintaro, Minami Yuichiro, Suzuki Atsushi, Hagiwara Nobuhisa
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Heart Vessels. 2015 Sep;30(5):604-10. doi: 10.1007/s00380-014-0534-3. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
It remains unclear whether flecainide, a Class I antiarrhythmic drug, improves left ventricular pressure gradient (LVPG) or symptoms in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Our study evaluated the long-term efficacy of flecainide, compared to disopyramide, when administered orally, on LVPG and symptoms in obstructive HCM patients. Among 164 obstructive HCM patients, 15 were administered oral flecainide therapy and 33 administered oral disopyramide therapy. LVPG declined from 79.8 ± 36.6 to 39.2 ± 36.7 mmHg (p = 0.003) after flecainide therapy and from 74.5 ± 26.4 to 31.4 ± 24.8 mmHg (p < 0.001) after disopyramide therapy. The percent reduction in LVPG was -47.9 ± 43.2 % in patients treated with flecainide, comparable to the results for those treated with disopyramide (-57.1 ± 33.0 %; p = 0.425). We found no significant differences in improvement in NYHA functional class between patients treated with flecainide and those treated with disopyramide (p = 0.331). Patients treated with flecainide exhibited no significant adverse side effects, and there was no need for myectomy or alcohol septal ablation to reduce LVPG and symptoms. Improvements in LVPG and symptoms were similar in patients treated with flecainide and patients treated with disopyramide, suggesting that flecainide is a potentially useful alternative for symptomatic obstructive HCM patients, particularly those with disopyramide-induced vagolytic side effects, narrow angle glaucoma, or prostatic hyperplasia and pre-existing urination difficulties. Our data must be viewed with caution, however, in view of the small number of study patients. Flecainide therapy will require further proof of safety before it can be routinely recommended in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM.
I类抗心律失常药物氟卡尼是否能改善梗阻性肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者的左心室压力阶差(LVPG)或症状仍不清楚。我们的研究评估了口服氟卡尼与丙吡胺相比,对梗阻性HCM患者LVPG和症状的长期疗效。在164例梗阻性HCM患者中,15例接受口服氟卡尼治疗,33例接受口服丙吡胺治疗。氟卡尼治疗后LVPG从79.8±36.6降至39.2±36.7 mmHg(p = 0.003),丙吡胺治疗后从74.5±26.4降至31.4±24.8 mmHg(p < 0.001)。接受氟卡尼治疗患者的LVPG降低百分比为-47.9±43.2% ,与接受丙吡胺治疗患者的结果相当(-57.1±33.0%;p = 0.425)。我们发现接受氟卡尼治疗的患者与接受丙吡胺治疗的患者在纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级改善方面无显著差异(p = 0.331)。接受氟卡尼治疗的患者未出现显著不良副作用,且无需进行心肌切除术或酒精室间隔消融术来降低LVPG和缓解症状。接受氟卡尼治疗的患者与接受丙吡胺治疗的患者在LVPG和症状改善方面相似,这表明氟卡尼对于有症状的梗阻性HCM患者,尤其是那些有丙吡胺引起的迷走神经溶解副作用、窄角型青光眼或前列腺增生及既往排尿困难的患者,可能是一种有用的替代药物。然而,鉴于研究患者数量较少,我们的数据必须谨慎看待。在有症状的梗阻性HCM患者中常规推荐使用氟卡尼治疗之前,还需要进一步证明其安全性。