• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析低级别创伤性脾损伤的干预需求。

Analysis of Need for Intervention in Low-Grade Traumatic Splenic Injury.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.

Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2023 Aug;89(8):3411-3415. doi: 10.1177/00031348231161707. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1177/00031348231161707
PMID:36893464
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blunt splenic injuries are common traumatic injuries. Severe injuries may require blood transfusion, procedural, or operative intervention. Conversely, patients with low-grade injuries and normal vital signs frequently do not require intervention. The level and duration of monitoring required to safely manage these patients are unclear. We hypothesize that low-grade splenic trauma has a low rate of intervention and may not require acute hospitalization.

METHODS

This retrospective descriptive analysis included patients admitted to a level I trauma center with low injury burden (injury severity score <15) and The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade 1 (G1) and 2 (G2) splenic injuries between January 2017 and December 2019 using the Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons (TRACS). The primary outcome was the need for any intervention. Secondary outcomes included time to intervention and length of stay.

RESULTS

107 patients met inclusion criteria. 87.9% required no intervention . 9.4% required blood products, with a median time to transfusion of 7.4 hours from arrival. All patients receiving blood products had extenuating circumstances such as bleeding from other injuries, anticoagulant use, or medical comorbidities. 2 patients required splenic artery embolization, one presenting with return precautions 9 days post-injury and 1 with significant comorbidities. One patient with concomitant bowel injury required splenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-grade blunt splenic trauma has a low rate of intervention, which typically occurs within the first 12 hours of presentation. This suggests that outpatient management with return precautions may be appropriate for select patients after a short interval of observation.

摘要

背景

钝性脾损伤是常见的外伤性损伤。严重损伤可能需要输血、程序或手术干预。相反,具有低等级损伤和正常生命体征的患者通常不需要干预。管理这些患者所需的监测水平和持续时间尚不清楚。我们假设低等级脾外伤的干预率较低,可能不需要急性住院治疗。

方法

本回顾性描述性分析纳入了 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在 I 级创伤中心因低损伤负担(损伤严重程度评分 <15)和美国外科医师协会创伤分级(AAST)1 级(G1)和 2 级(G2)脾损伤而入院的患者,使用美国外科医师学院创伤登记处(TRACS)。主要结局是任何干预的需求。次要结局包括干预时间和住院时间。

结果

107 例患者符合纳入标准。87.9%的患者无需干预。9.4%需要血液制品,从入院到输血的中位数时间为 7.4 小时。所有接受血液制品的患者都有特殊情况,如其他损伤出血、抗凝剂使用或合并症。2 例患者需要脾动脉栓塞,1 例在受伤后 9 天出现返回预防措施,1 例有严重合并症。1 例伴有肠损伤的患者需要脾切除术。

结论

低等级钝性脾外伤的干预率较低,通常发生在就诊后的前 12 小时内。这表明,在短时间观察后,对于选择的患者,门诊管理并进行返回预防措施可能是合适的。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Need for Intervention in Low-Grade Traumatic Splenic Injury.分析低级别创伤性脾损伤的干预需求。
Am Surg. 2023 Aug;89(8):3411-3415. doi: 10.1177/00031348231161707. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
Splenic injury during colonoscopy: modern treatment approach and splenic salvage.结肠镜检查时的脾脏损伤:现代治疗方法和脾脏保留。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2022 Oct-Dec;85(4):635-636. doi: 10.51821/85.3.11004.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Splenic Artery Embolization Versus Splenectomy in the Management of Hemodynamically Stable High-Grade Blunt Splenic Injuries: A National Analysis.脾动脉栓塞与脾切除术治疗血流动力学稳定的高级别钝性脾损伤的临床结局:全国性分析。
J Surg Res. 2024 Aug;300:221-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.012. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
4
Pediatric trauma patients with isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries may be safely managed without intensive care unit admission.对于伴有孤立性 III 级钝性脾损伤的儿科创伤患者,可安全地在不经重症监护病房收治的情况下进行治疗。
Surgery. 2024 Aug;176(2):511-514. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.040. Epub 2024 May 31.
5
Contrast extravasation predicts the need for operative intervention in children with blunt splenic trauma.对比剂外渗可预测钝性脾外伤患儿是否需要手术干预。
J Trauma. 2004 Mar;56(3):537-41. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000112328.81051.fc.
6
Surveillance Imaging Associated With Delayed Splenectomy in High-Grade Blunt Splenic Trauma.高级钝性脾外伤中延迟性脾切除术与监测成像相关。
Am Surg. 2023 Jul;89(7):3214-3216. doi: 10.1177/00031348231157844. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
7
Non-surgical Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma: A Comparative Analysis of Non-operative Management and Splenic Artery Embolization-Experience from a European Trauma Center.钝性脾外伤的非手术治疗:非手术治疗与脾动脉栓塞术的对比分析——来自欧洲创伤中心的经验
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Sep;41(9):1324-1332. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-1953-9. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
8
Embolization for pediatric blunt splenic injury is an alternative to splenectomy when observation fails.对于儿科钝性脾损伤,如果观察治疗失败,栓塞是脾切除的替代方法。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Sep;75(3):421-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182995c70.
9
Blunt trauma to the spleen.脾脏钝性创伤。
Aust N Z J Surg. 2000 May;70(5):333-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01821.x.
10
The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale for Spleen Does Not Equally Predict Interventions in Penetrating and Blunt Trauma.美国创伤外科学会脾损伤分级对穿透性和钝性创伤的干预预测并不等同。
Am Surg. 2023 Dec;89(12):5782-5785. doi: 10.1177/00031348231175495. Epub 2023 May 9.