University of California, Irvine, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Orange, CA.
Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Department of Anesthesiology, Los Angeles, CA.
Surgery. 2024 Aug;176(2):511-514. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.040. Epub 2024 May 31.
Non-operative management is the standard of care for pediatric blunt splenic injury. The American Pediatric Surgical Association recommends intensive care unit monitoring only for grade IV/V blunt splenic injury; however, variation remains regarding this practice. We hypothesized that pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries admitted to a non-intensive care unit setting would have similar outcomes to those admitted to the intensive care unit.
The 2017 to 2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for blunt pediatric trauma patients (≤16 years) with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries. Patients with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or heart rate >90 were excluded. Pediatric trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit were compared to non-intensive care unit admissions. The primary outcome was splenectomy. Bivariate analyses were performed.
Of 461 pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries, 186 (40.3%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Intensive care unit patients were older than their non-intensive care unit counterparts (15 vs 14 years, P = .03). Intensive care unit and non-intensive care unit patients had a similar rate of splenectomy (0.5% vs 0.7%, P = .80) and time to surgery (19.7 vs 19.8 hours, P = .98). Patients admitted to the intensive care unit had a longer length of stay (4 vs 3 days, P < .001). There were no significant complications or deaths in either group.
This national analysis demonstrated that hemodynamically stable pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries admitted to the floor or intensive care unit had a similar rate of splenectomy without complications or deaths. This aligns with American Pediatric Surgical Association recommendations that pediatric trauma patients with grade III blunt splenic injuries be managed in non-intensive care unit settings. Widespread adoption is warranted and should lead to decreased healthcare expenditures.
非手术治疗是小儿钝性脾损伤的标准治疗方法。美国小儿外科学会建议仅对 IV/V 级钝性脾损伤进行重症监护病房监测;然而,这种做法仍存在差异。我们假设,收入非重症监护病房的接近孤立性 III 级钝性脾损伤的儿科创伤患者与收入重症监护病房的患者具有相似的结局。
2017 年至 2019 年创伤质量改进计划数据库中检索到近孤立性 III 级钝性脾损伤的钝性小儿创伤患者(≤16 岁)。排除收缩压<90mmHg 或心率>90 的患者。比较收入重症监护病房的儿科创伤患者与非重症监护病房的入院情况。主要结局是脾切除术。进行了双变量分析。
在 461 例近孤立性 III 级钝性脾损伤的儿科创伤患者中,186 例(40.3%)收入重症监护病房。重症监护病房患者比非重症监护病房患者年龄更大(15 岁与 14 岁,P=0.03)。重症监护病房和非重症监护病房患者的脾切除术率相似(0.5%与 0.7%,P=0.80)和手术时间(19.7 小时与 19.8 小时,P=0.98)。收入重症监护病房的患者住院时间更长(4 天与 3 天,P<0.001)。两组均无严重并发症或死亡。
这项全国性分析表明,收入重症监护病房或普通病房的血流动力学稳定的近孤立性 III 级钝性脾损伤儿科创伤患者,脾切除术率相似,无并发症或死亡。这与美国小儿外科学会的建议一致,即 III 级钝性脾损伤的儿科创伤患者应在非重症监护病房环境中进行管理。应该广泛采用这种方法,并应导致医疗支出的减少。