Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden; Bergen Center for Brain Plasticity, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 15;331:322-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
Different cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) have strong research support for treatment of adult depressive disorders (DD). Given the scarcity of knowledge about the performance of CBT in routine clinical care, a systematic review and meta-analysis of CBT for adults with DD treated in this context was conducted.
Published studies until the end of September 2022, were systematically searched in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase OVID, and PsycINFO. The effectiveness of CBT, methodological quality, and moderators of treatment outcome were examined, and benchmarked by meta-analytically comparing with efficacy studies for DD.
Twenty-eight studies, comprising 3734 participants, were included. Large within-group effect sizes (ES) were obtained for DD-severity at post-treatment, and follow-up, on average 8 months post-treatment. Benchmarking analysis showed that effectiveness studies had very similar ESs as efficacy studies at post-treatment (1.51 vs. 1.71) and follow-up (1.71 vs. 1.85). Remission rates were also very similar; effectiveness studies 44 % and 46 %, efficacy studies 45 % and 46 %, at post-treatment and follow-up, respectively.
Only studies published in English-language peer-reviewed journals were included and the use of pre-post ES in the meta-analyses could contribute to biased outcomes.
CBT for DD is an effective treatment when delivered in routine clinical care and the outcomes of effectiveness studies for DD are comparable to the effects obtained in efficacy studies.
CRD42022285615.
不同的认知行为疗法(CBT)在治疗成人抑郁症(DD)方面有强有力的研究支持。鉴于关于 CBT 在常规临床护理中的表现的知识匮乏,对在这种情况下接受治疗的成人 DD 进行了 CBT 的系统评价和荟萃分析。
截至 2022 年 9 月底,在 Ovid MEDLINE、Embase OVID 和 PsycINFO 中系统地搜索了已发表的研究。检查了 CBT 的疗效、方法学质量和治疗结果的调节因素,并通过与 DD 的疗效研究进行荟萃分析比较进行了基准测试。
共纳入 28 项研究,包含 3734 名参与者。在治疗后和随访时,DD 严重程度的组内效应量(ES)较大,平均在治疗后 8 个月进行随访。基准测试分析表明,在治疗后(1.51 对 1.71)和随访时(1.71 对 1.85),有效性研究与疗效研究的 ES 非常相似。缓解率也非常相似;有效性研究分别为 44%和 46%,疗效研究分别为 45%和 46%。
仅纳入了发表在英语同行评议期刊上的研究,荟萃分析中使用的治疗前后 ES 可能导致结果存在偏倚。
当在常规临床护理中提供时,CBT 治疗 DD 是一种有效的治疗方法,DD 的有效性研究结果与疗效研究的效果相当。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022285615。