Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga, Japan.
Department of Pharmacy, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.
J Orthop Sci. 2024 Mar;29(2):646-652. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
The risk factors for progression of severity of locomotive syndrome (LS) remain unclear.
We conducted a longitudinal observational study of 1148 community-dwelling residents (median age, 68.0 years old; 548 males, 600 females) from 2016 to 2018. LS was assessed by the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25), and total scores of ≤6 points, 7-15 points, 16-23 points, and ≥24 points were diagnosed as non-LS, LS-1, LS-2, and LS-3, respectively. If the LS severity in 2018 was higher than in 2016, the case was defined as progression of LS severity; otherwise, it was defined as non-progressive LS. We compared the age, gender, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, living situation, car use, chronic musculoskeletal pain, comorbidities, metabolic syndrome, physical activity, and LS severity in 2016 between the progression and non-progression groups. Furthermore, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to elucidate the risk factors for progression of LS severity.
Participants in the progression group had a significantly older age, a lower rate of car use, a higher rate of low back pain, a higher rate of hip pain, a higher rate of knee pain, a higher GLFS-25 total score, and a higher rate of LS-2 than those in the non-progression group. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that older age, female gender, higher body mass index (≥25.0 kg/m), presence of low back pain, and presence of hip pain were risk factors for the progression of LS within two years.
To prevent the progression of LS severity, related prophylaxis strategies should be implemented, especially for individuals with the above-mentioned characteristics. Further longitudinal studies with a longer observation period are necessary.
locomotive 综合征(LS)严重程度进展的危险因素尚不清楚。
我们对 2016 年至 2018 年期间的 1148 名社区居民(中位年龄 68.0 岁;548 名男性,600 名女性)进行了纵向观察性研究。LS 通过 25 项老年 locomotive 功能量表(GLFS-25)进行评估,总得分≤6 分、7-15 分、16-23 分和≥24 分分别诊断为非 LS、LS-1、LS-2 和 LS-3。如果 2018 年的 LS 严重程度高于 2016 年,则定义为 LS 严重程度进展;否则,定义为 LS 严重程度无进展。我们比较了 2016 年进展组和非进展组的年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟状况、饮酒状况、居住情况、汽车使用情况、慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛、合并症、代谢综合征、身体活动和 LS 严重程度。此外,还进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以阐明 LS 严重程度进展的危险因素。
进展组参与者年龄较大,汽车使用率较低,腰痛发生率较高,髋痛发生率较高,膝关节疼痛发生率较高,GLFS-25 总评分较高,LS-2 发生率较高。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,年龄较大、女性、体重指数较高(≥25.0 kg/m2)、腰痛和髋痛是两年内 LS 进展的危险因素。
为了防止 LS 严重程度的进展,应采取相关的预防策略,特别是针对具有上述特征的个体。需要进行具有更长观察期的进一步纵向研究。