Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚和新西兰的助产士主导随机对照试验:范围综述。

Midwife led randomised controlled trials in Australia and New Zealand: A scoping review.

机构信息

Burnet Institute, Victoria, Australia.

Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Women Birth. 2023 Sep;36(5):401-408. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Midwives are the largest workforce involved in caring for pregnant women and their babies, and are well placed to translate research into practice and ensure midwifery priorities are appropriately targeted in researched. Currently, the number and focus of randomised controlled trials led by midwives in Australia and New Zealand is unknown. The Australasian Nursing and Midwifery Clinical Trials Network was established in 2020 to build nursing and midwifery research capacity. To aid this, scoping reviews of the quality and quantity of nurse and midwife led trials were undertaken.

AIM

To identify midwife led trials conducted between 2000 and 2021 in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS

This review was informed by the JBI scoping review framework. Medline, Emcare, and Scopus were searched from 2000-August 2021. ANZCTR, NHMRC, MRFF, and HRC (NZ) registries were searched from inception to July 2021.

FINDINGS

Of 26,467 randomised controlled trials registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, 50 midwife led trials, and 35 peer-reviewed publications were identified. Publications were of moderate to high quality with scores limited due to an inability to blind participants or clinicians. Blinding of assessors was included in 19 published trials.

DISCUSSION

Additional support for midwives to design and conduct trials and publish findings is required. Further support is needed to translate registration of trial protocols into peer reviewed publications.

CONCLUSION

These findings will inform the Australasian Nursing and Midwifery Clinical Trials Network plans to promote quality midwife led trials.

摘要

背景

助产士是参与照顾孕妇及其婴儿的最大劳动力群体,他们能够将研究成果转化为实践,并确保研究中适当针对助产士的优先事项。目前,澳大利亚和新西兰的助产士领导的随机对照试验的数量和重点尚不清楚。澳大拉西亚护理和助产士临床试验网络于 2020 年成立,旨在建立护理和助产研究能力。为此,对护士和助产士领导的试验的质量和数量进行了范围审查。

目的

确定 2000 年至 2021 年期间在澳大利亚和新西兰进行的助产士主导的试验。

方法

本综述遵循 JBI 范围综述框架。从 2000 年 8 月至 2021 年 8 月,检索了 Medline、Emcare 和 Scopus。从成立到 2021 年 7 月,检索了 ANZCTR、NHMRC、MRFF 和 HRC(NZ)登记处。

结果

在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心注册的 26467 项随机对照试验中,确定了 50 项助产士主导的试验和 35 项同行评审出版物。出版物的质量为中等至高等,由于无法对参与者或临床医生进行盲法,评分受到限制。19 项已发表的试验中包括评估员的盲法。

讨论

需要为助产士提供更多支持,以设计和开展试验并发表研究结果。需要进一步支持,将试验方案的注册转化为同行评审的出版物。

结论

这些发现将为澳大拉西亚护理和助产士临床试验网络计划促进高质量的助产士主导试验提供信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验