• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与澳大利亚难民社区合作,应用优化健康素养和获取(Ophelia)流程:研究方案。

Application of the optimizing health literacy and access (Ophelia) process in partnership with a refugee community in Australia: Study protocol.

机构信息

Centre for Global Health and Equity, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;11:1112538. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1112538. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1112538
PMID:36895685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9989023/
Abstract

Refugees experience health inequities resulting from multiple barriers and difficulties in accessing and engaging with services. A health literacy development approach can be used to understand health literacy strengths, needs, and preferences to build equitable access to services and information. This protocol details an adaptation of the Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) process to ensure authentic engagement of all stakeholders to generate culturally appropriate, needed, wanted and implementable multisectoral solutions among a former refugee community in Melbourne, Australia. The Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), widely applied around the world in different population groups, including refugees, is usually the quantitative needs assessment tool of the Ophelia process. This protocol outlines an approach tailored to the context, literacy, and health literacy needs of former refugees. This project will engage a refugee settlement agency and a former refugee community (Karen people origin from Myanmar also formerly knowns as Burma) in codesign from inception. A needs assessment will identify health literacy strengths, needs, and preferences, basic demographic data and service engagement of the Karen community. This community will be engaged and interviewed using a semi-structured interview based on the Conversational Health Literacy and Assessment Tool (CHAT) will cover supportive professional and personal relationships, health behaviors, access to health information, use of health services, and health promotion barriers and support. Using the needs assessment data, vignettes portraying typical individuals from this community will be developed. Stakeholders will be invited to participate in ideas generation and prioritization workshops for in-depth discussion on what works well and not well for the community. Contextually and culturally appropriate and meaningful action ideas will be co-designed to respond to identified health literacy strengths, needs, and preferences of the community. This protocol will develop and test new and improved methods that are likely to be useful for community-based organizations and health services to systematically understand and improve communication, services and outcomes among disadvantaged groups, particularly migrants and refugees.

摘要

难民在获取和使用服务方面面临多种障碍和困难,因此会经历健康不平等的问题。健康素养发展方法可用于了解健康素养的优势、需求和偏好,从而建立公平获取服务和信息的途径。本方案详细介绍了对奥菲莉亚(优化健康素养和获取途径)流程的改编,以确保所有利益相关者都能真实参与,从而在澳大利亚墨尔本的一个前难民社区中生成文化上适当、需要、期望和可实施的多部门解决方案。健康素养问卷(HLQ)在世界各地的不同人群中,包括难民中,广泛应用,通常是奥菲莉亚流程的定量需求评估工具。本方案概述了一种针对前难民的背景、读写能力和健康素养需求定制的方法。该项目将从一开始就与一个难民安置机构和一个前难民社区(来自缅甸的克伦族,也被称为缅甸)合作进行共同设计。需求评估将确定克伦族社区的健康素养优势、需求和偏好、基本人口统计数据和服务参与情况。将使用基于会话健康素养和评估工具(CHAT)的半结构化访谈对该社区进行访谈,以涵盖支持性的专业和个人关系、健康行为、获取健康信息、使用健康服务以及健康促进障碍和支持。使用需求评估数据,将开发描绘该社区典型个体的情景。将邀请利益相关者参加创意生成和优先级确定研讨会,以深入讨论对社区来说效果良好和不佳的内容。将共同设计符合上下文和文化且有意义的行动创意,以满足社区的健康素养优势、需求和偏好。本方案将开发和测试新的和改进的方法,这些方法可能对社区组织和卫生服务机构有用,可以系统地了解和改善弱势群体(特别是移民和难民)的沟通、服务和结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a6/9989023/fb32bb7c9813/fpubh-11-1112538-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a6/9989023/fb32bb7c9813/fpubh-11-1112538-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a6/9989023/fb32bb7c9813/fpubh-11-1112538-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of the optimizing health literacy and access (Ophelia) process in partnership with a refugee community in Australia: Study protocol.与澳大利亚难民社区合作,应用优化健康素养和获取(Ophelia)流程:研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;11:1112538. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1112538. eCollection 2023.
2
Migrant Communities at the Center in Co-design of Health Literacy-Based Innovative Solutions for Non-communicable Diseases Prevention and Risk Reduction: Application of the OPtimising HEalth LIteracy and Access (Ophelia) Process.以移民社区为核心,共同设计基于健康素养的非传染性疾病预防和风险降低创新解决方案:优化健康素养与获取(奥菲莉亚)流程的应用
Front Public Health. 2021 May 31;9:639405. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.639405. eCollection 2021.
3
Systematic development and implementation of interventions to OPtimise Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia).优化健康素养与可及性干预措施的系统开发与实施(奥菲莉亚)。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 3;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4147-5.
4
Co-designing eHealth and Equity Solutions: Application of the Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) Process.共同设计电子健康和公平解决方案:奥菲莉亚(优化健康素养和获取)过程的应用。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;8:604401. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604401. eCollection 2020.
5
Codesign and implementation of an equity-promoting national health literacy programme for people living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a protocol for the application of the Optimising Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia) process.促进炎症性肠病患者公平获取健康素养国家项目的设计与实施:应用优化健康素养和获取(Ophelia)流程的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 26;11(8):e045059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045059.
6
Health literacy and cultural responsiveness of primary health care systems and services in Australia: reflections from service providers, stakeholders, and people from refugee backgrounds.澳大利亚初级卫生保健系统和服务的健康素养和文化响应能力:服务提供者、利益相关者和难民背景人士的反思。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 21;23(1):2557. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17448-z.
7
The OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy (Ophelia) process: study protocol for using health literacy profiling and community engagement to create and implement health reform.优化健康素养(奥菲莉亚)流程:运用健康素养剖析及社区参与来制定和实施健康改革的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 7;14:694. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-694.
8
Seeking Health Information: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Women of Refugee Background from Myanmar in Perth, Western Australia.寻求健康信息:西澳珀斯有难民背景的缅甸妇女经历的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3289. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063289.
9
Responding to health literacy of refugees in Australian primary health care settings: a qualitative study of barriers and potential solutions.回应澳大利亚基层医疗保健环境中难民的健康素养:对障碍和潜在解决方案的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11192-9.
10
Refugee healthcare needs and barriers to accessing healthcare services in New Zealand: a qualitative phenomenological approach.新西兰难民的医疗需求和获取医疗服务的障碍:一种定性现象学方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 3;22(1):1310. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08560-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying co-design health literacy development in Australian prisons: protocol for system-wide application of the Optimising Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia) process.在澳大利亚监狱中应用共同设计的健康素养发展:优化健康素养与获取(Ophelia)流程的全系统应用方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 7;15(4):e092128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092128.
2
Measuring health literacy to inform actions to address health inequities: a cluster analysis approach based on the Australian national health literacy survey.测量健康素养以指导解决健康不平等问题的行动:基于澳大利亚全国健康素养调查的聚类分析方法
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 Dec 1;46(4):e663-e674. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdae165.

本文引用的文献

1
Health literacy development is central to the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases.健康素养的发展对于非传染性疾病的预防和控制至关重要。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Dec;7(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010362.
2
The Health Literacy in Pregnancy (HeLP) Program Study Protocol: Development of an Antenatal Care Intervention Using the Ophelia Process.妊娠健康素养(HeLP)项目研究方案:使用 Ophelia 流程开发产前护理干预措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;19(8):4449. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084449.
3
Exploring the design and introduction of the Ophelia (Optimising Health Literacy and Access) process in the Philippines: A qualitative case study.
探索菲律宾奥菲莉亚(优化健康素养与可及性)流程的设计与引入:一项定性案例研究
Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Jul;33(3):829-837. doi: 10.1002/hpja.546. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
4
Health literacy levels and correlates among refugees in Mount Lebanon.黎巴嫩山的难民健康素养水平及相关因素。
Public Health. 2021 Oct;199:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
5
Codesign and implementation of an equity-promoting national health literacy programme for people living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a protocol for the application of the Optimising Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia) process.促进炎症性肠病患者公平获取健康素养国家项目的设计与实施:应用优化健康素养和获取(Ophelia)流程的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 26;11(8):e045059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045059.
6
Chronic disease health literacy in First Nations people: A mixed methods study.第一民族人群的慢性病健康素养:混合方法研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Sep;30(17-18):2683-2695. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15757. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
7
Migrant Communities at the Center in Co-design of Health Literacy-Based Innovative Solutions for Non-communicable Diseases Prevention and Risk Reduction: Application of the OPtimising HEalth LIteracy and Access (Ophelia) Process.以移民社区为核心,共同设计基于健康素养的非传染性疾病预防和风险降低创新解决方案:优化健康素养与获取(奥菲莉亚)流程的应用
Front Public Health. 2021 May 31;9:639405. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.639405. eCollection 2021.
8
Health Literacy Co-Design in a Low Resource Setting: Harnessing Local Wisdom to Inform Interventions across Fishing Villages in Egypt to Improve Health and Equity.健康素养共同设计在资源匮乏环境下的应用:利用本土智慧为埃及渔村的干预措施提供信息,以改善健康和公平状况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;18(9):4518. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094518.
9
Refugee and Migrant Health Literacy Interventions in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.高收入国家难民和移民健康素养干预措施:系统评价。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Feb;24(1):207-236. doi: 10.1007/s10903-021-01152-4. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
10
Co-designing eHealth and Equity Solutions: Application of the Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) Process.共同设计电子健康和公平解决方案:奥菲莉亚(优化健康素养和获取)过程的应用。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;8:604401. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604401. eCollection 2020.