一项针对有氧能力的次最大运动场地测试不能准确反映职业消防员的最大摄氧量。
A Submaximal Field Test of Aerobic Capacity does not Accurately Reflect VO in Career Firefighters.
作者信息
Hale Davis, Kollock Roger, Thomas Jacob, Sanders Gabe, Peveler Will, Mangan Andrew, Landon Blake
机构信息
The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
University of Northern Kentucky, Highland Heights KY, USA.
出版信息
Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Jan 1;15(4):221-230. doi: 10.70252/YLQD4760. eCollection 2022.
Adequate aerobic capacity is crucial to maintaining firefighter safety. The purpose of this study was to compare predicted VO scores from a submaximal and maximal step test. Eighteen career male firefighters from a medium sized urban municipality completed both a submaximal Forestry step test and a maximal laboratory WFI step test. A lack of association ( = .017) and low level of agreement ( = .015) was determined between step test protocols producing a mean bias of ± 5.61 mL.kg-1/min-1 with most scores being overestimated. Use of the Forestry step test to predict true VO in firefighters should be used with caution when classifying firefighter fitness.
充足的有氧能力对于维持消防员的安全至关重要。本研究的目的是比较次最大和最大台阶试验预测的VO₂分数。来自一个中等规模城市的18名职业男性消防员完成了次最大林业台阶试验和最大实验室WFI台阶试验。两种台阶试验方案之间存在缺乏关联性（p = 0.017）和低一致性水平（p = 0.015），产生的平均偏差为±5.61 mL·kg⁻¹/min⁻¹，大多数分数被高估。在对消防员体能进行分类时，使用林业台阶试验来预测消防员的真实VO₂时应谨慎。
Zotero 插件