Department of Human Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(7):397-407. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.792681.
This study investigated the effects of firefighter personal protective equipment (PPE) on the determination of maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) while using two different treadmill protocols: a progressive incline protocol (PIP) and a progressive speed protocol (PSP), with three clothing conditions (Light-light clothing; Boots-PPE with rubber boots; Shoes-PPE with running shoes). Bruce protocol with Light was performed for a reference test. Results showed there was no difference in VO(2max) between Bruce Light, PIP Light, and PSP Light. However, VO(2max) was reduced in Boots and Shoes with shortened maximal performance time (7 and 6 min reduced for PIP Boots and Shoes, respectively; 11 and 9 min reduced for PSP Boots and Shoes, respectively), whereas the increasing rate of VO(2) in Boots and Shoes during submaximal exercise was greater compared with Light. Wearing firefighter boots compared with wearing running shoes also significantly affected submaximal VO(2) but not VO(2max). These results suggest that firefighters' maximal performance determined from a typical VO(2max) test without wearing PPE may overestimate the actual performance capability of firefighters wearing PPE.
本研究调查了在使用两种不同跑步机协议(递增坡度协议(PIP)和递增速度协议(PSP))和三种服装条件(轻便服装;靴子个人防护装备配橡胶靴;鞋子个人防护装备配跑鞋)时,消防员个人防护装备(PPE)对最大摄氧量(VO₂max)测定的影响。采用轻便服装进行布鲁斯协议作为参考测试。结果表明,布鲁斯轻便服装、PIP 轻便服装和 PSP 轻便服装之间的 VO₂max 没有差异。然而,在 PIP 靴子和鞋子以及 PSP 靴子和鞋子中,最大性能时间缩短(分别减少 7 分钟和 6 分钟),VO₂max 降低,而在亚最大运动期间,靴子和鞋子中的 VO₂增加率与轻便服装相比更高。与穿跑鞋相比,穿消防靴也会显著影响亚最大 VO₂,但不会影响 VO₂max。这些结果表明,在不穿 PPE 的情况下,从典型的 VO₂max 测试中确定的消防员最大性能可能高估了穿 PPE 的消防员的实际性能能力。