DE Camargo Júlio B B, Brigatto Felipe A, Germano Moisés D, DA Conceição Raphael M, Teixeira Ivan, Duarte Rebecca G, Fellet Luiza, Braz Tiago V, Prestes Jonato, Marchetti Paulo H, Willardson Jeffrey M, Lopes Charles R
Methodist University of Piracicaba, Human Performance Research Group, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Catholic University of Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Jan 1;15(4):231-244. doi: 10.70252/VHXB7598. eCollection 2022.
The present study investigated acute muscular performance and metabolic responses to resistance training (RT) with inter-set stretching (ISS). Seventeen resistance-trained men (age: 30.0 ± 5.6 years; body mass: 81.8 ± 13.4 kg; height: 173 ± 6.2 cm; RT experience: 4.6 ± 1.7 years) completed the ISS and traditional training (TT) protocol seven days apart in a randomized order. In both protocols, 7 sets of the seated cable fly exercise were performed with a 10-repetition maximum (10-RM) load. During the ISS protocol, subjects completed inter-set passive static stretching of the agonist muscles for 45 seconds, while a passive rest (no stretching) was adopted for the same duration in the TT protocol. The change in maximal bench press strength (1-RM), muscle swelling (ultrasound) of the pectoralis major (PM), and blood lactate were assessed immediately following each protocol. Additionally, the total load lifted (TLL) and internal training load (ITL) were assessed in both protocols. There was no difference between protocols for the change in maximal bench press 1-RM ( > 0.05). There were higher values for PM ( < 0.05) and blood lactate ( < 0.05) following the TT versus the ISS protocol. The TT resulted in higher TLL ( < 0.05) and ITL values ( < 0.05) versus the ISS protocol. Resistance training with inter-set stretching results in lower acute performance and metabolic responses versus traditional training with passive rest between sets. Therefore, inter-set stretching might be applied within a periodized program on lower intensity days to reduce the overall stress of a session.
本研究调查了进行组间拉伸(ISS)的抗阻训练(RT)对急性肌肉表现和代谢反应的影响。17名有抗阻训练经验的男性(年龄:30.0±5.6岁;体重:81.8±13.4千克;身高:173±6.2厘米;抗阻训练经验:4.6±1.7年)以随机顺序,在相隔七天的时间里分别完成了ISS和传统训练(TT)方案。在这两种方案中,均以10次重复最大值(10-RM)的负荷进行7组坐姿绳索夹胸练习。在ISS方案中,受试者对主动肌进行45秒的组间被动静态拉伸,而在TT方案中,在相同时间段内采用被动休息(不拉伸)。在每个方案结束后,立即评估最大卧推力量(1-RM)的变化、胸大肌(PM)的肌肉肿胀(超声测量)和血乳酸水平。此外,还评估了两种方案中的总举重量(TLL)和内部训练负荷(ITL)。两种方案在最大卧推1-RM的变化方面无差异(>0.05)。与ISS方案相比,TT方案后的PM值(<0.05)和血乳酸值(<0.05)更高。与ISS方案相比,TT方案的TLL值(<0.05)和ITL值(<0.05)更高。与组间进行被动休息的传统训练相比,组间拉伸的抗阻训练导致更低的急性表现和代谢反应。因此,组间拉伸可应用于周期性训练计划中强度较低的日子,以降低单次训练的整体压力。