• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磨牙症是否会影响下颌后牙单颗种植体周围的边缘骨水平?

Does Bruxism Affect Marginal Bone Level around Single Tooth Implants in the Posterior Mandible?

作者信息

Tabrizi Reza, Rasaei Mahdie, Moslemi Hamidreza, Shafiei Shervin, Latifi Fatemeh

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Danshjoo BLVD, Velenjak, Shahid, Chamran Highway, 1983963113 Tehran, Iran.

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Dec;21(4):1162-1167. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01617-x. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1007/s12663-021-01617-x
PMID:36896080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9989056/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parafunctional forces are a potential risk factor for implant-related complications. This study aimed to evaluate the possible relationship of bruxism with implant-related complications and marginal bone loss (MBL).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients were divided into two groups with and without bruxism, and received single-tooth implants in the posterior mandible. Patients in the bruxer group were requested to use a customized fabricated night guard. Bone quality was also assessed based on CBCT scans. The MBL, crown detachment, and porcelain fracture were evaluated, and clinical assessments were made at the 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were studied in two groups ( = 35 in each group). None of the implants in any of the two groups showed pain, sensitivity, suppuration, exudation, clinically detectable mobility, or peri-implant radiolucency. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the mean MBL at the 12-month follow-up ( =  0.60). Regarding bone quality, there was no significant difference in the mean MBL among different types of bone qualities ( = 0.66). There were no significant differences regarding crown detachment and porcelain fracture between the two groups either ( =  0.32 and  =  0.30, respectively).

CONCLUSION

According to the results of this study, dental implant treatment according to the suggested protocol in bruxers yielded promising outcomes.

摘要

背景

副功能力是种植相关并发症的一个潜在风险因素。本研究旨在评估磨牙症与种植相关并发症及边缘骨丢失(MBL)之间可能存在的关系。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,患者被分为有磨牙症和无磨牙症两组,并在下颌后部接受单颗牙种植。磨牙症组的患者被要求使用定制的夜磨牙垫。还根据锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估骨质量。评估MBL、牙冠脱落和瓷裂情况,并在12个月随访时进行临床评估。

结果

两组共研究了70例患者(每组35例)。两组中的任何种植体均未出现疼痛、敏感、化脓、渗出、临床可检测到的松动或种植体周围透射影。在12个月随访时,两组的平均MBL无显著差异(=0.60)。关于骨质量,不同类型骨质量的平均MBL也无显著差异(=0.66)。两组之间在牙冠脱落和瓷裂方面也无显著差异(分别为=0.32和=0.30)。

结论

根据本研究结果,按照建议方案对磨牙症患者进行牙种植治疗取得了良好的效果。

相似文献

1
Does Bruxism Affect Marginal Bone Level around Single Tooth Implants in the Posterior Mandible?磨牙症是否会影响下颌后牙单颗种植体周围的边缘骨水平?
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Dec;21(4):1162-1167. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01617-x. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
2
Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non-bruxer patients: A retrospective case-control study.种植体周围边缘骨丧失:磨牙症和非磨牙症患者匹配组之间的比较:回顾性病例对照研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Feb;25(1):124-132. doi: 10.1111/cid.13161. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
3
Zirconia implants: a promising alternative to titanium?氧化锆种植体:钛的一种有前景的替代物?
Evid Based Dent. 2021 Jan;22(3):102-103. doi: 10.1038/s41432-021-0202-2.
4
Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients-a retrospective clinical study.种植体周围边缘骨丧失:糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的比较——一项回顾性临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jun;27(6):2833-2841. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04872-z. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
Does crown-to-implant ratio affect marginal bone loss around a single short implant at the posterior of the mandible?冠根比是否会影响下颌后部单个短种植体周围的边缘骨吸收?
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2024 May-Aug;15(2):273-277. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_27_23. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
6
Implant survival rate and marginal bone loss with the all-on-4 immediate-loading strategy: A clinical retrospective study with 1 to 4 years of follow-up.采用 All-on-4 即刻负重策略的种植体存活率和边缘骨丧失:一项 1 至 4 年随访的临床回顾性研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Dec;130(6):849-857. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.12.020. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
7
Influence of Crown-Implant Ratio and Implant Inclination on Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Region: A Retrospective Clinical Study.冠种植体比例和种植体倾斜度对后牙区单冠种植体周围边缘骨吸收的影响:一项回顾性临床研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 29;12(9):3219. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093219.
8
[Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].[后牙单颗种植体支持修复体5年随访疗效的临床观察]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Oct 18;53(5):970-976. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.05.027.
9
Bruxism and dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.磨牙症与牙种植体:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Jan;51(1):202-217. doi: 10.1111/joor.13567. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
10
Risk factors for single crowns supported by short (6-mm) implants in the posterior region: A prospective clinical and radiographic study.短种植体(6mm)在后牙区支持的单冠修复的风险因素:一项前瞻性临床和影像学研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Aug;19(4):671-680. doi: 10.1111/cid.12494. Epub 2017 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Does traumatic occlusal forces lead to peri-implant bone loss? A systematic review.创伤性咬合力量会导致种植体周围骨丢失吗?一项系统评价。
Braz Oral Res. 2019 Sep 30;33(suppl 1):e069. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0069. eCollection 2019.
2
What Are the Incidence and Factors Associated With Implant Fracture?种植体骨折的发生率及相关因素有哪些?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Sep;75(9):1866-1872. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 24.
3
Bruxism and dental implant treatment complications: a retrospective comparative study of 98 bruxer patients and a matched group.磨牙症与牙种植体治疗并发症:98 例磨牙症患者与匹配组的回顾性对比研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):e1-e9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12844. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
4
Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.骨水泥固位与螺丝固位种植体支持修复体边缘骨丧失的评估:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr;115(4):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
5
Bruxism and Dental Implants: A Meta-Analysis.磨牙症与牙种植体:一项荟萃分析
Implant Dent. 2015 Oct;24(5):505-16. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000298.
6
Does Bruxism Contribute to Dental Implant Failure? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.磨牙症会导致牙种植失败吗?一项系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Apr;18(2):410-20. doi: 10.1111/cid.12300. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
7
Impact of excessive occlusal load on successfully-osseointegrated dental implants: a literature review.过度咬合负荷对成功骨结合牙种植体的影响:文献综述
J Investig Clin Dent. 2013 Aug;4(3):142-50. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12036.
8
Epidemiology of bruxism in adults: a systematic review of the literature.成人磨牙症的流行病学:文献系统综述
J Orofac Pain. 2013 Spring;27(2):99-110. doi: 10.11607/jop.921.
9
Short (8-mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a prospective clinical study with 1-to 10-years of follow-up.后牙区支持单冠修复的短(8毫米)锁定锥形种植体:一项为期1至10年随访的前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Aug;25(8):933-40. doi: 10.1111/clr.12181. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
10
Is bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? A systematic review of the literature.磨牙症是牙种植体的一个风险因素吗?一项文献系统综述。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Jun;16(3):460-9. doi: 10.1111/cid.12015. Epub 2012 Nov 13.