Suppr超能文献

前列腺放射治疗所致正常组织积分剂量:高剂量率近距离放射治疗与现代外照射放射治疗技术的定量比较

Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques.

作者信息

Grzywacz Vincent P, Arden Jessica D, Mankuzhy Nikhil P, Gustafson Gary S, Sebastian Evelyn A, Abbott Veronica L, Walters Kailee J, Puzzonia Julie A, Limbacher Amy S, Hafron Jason M, Krauss Daniel J

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan.

Department of Internal Medicine, St. Joseph's Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Dec 27;8(3):101160. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101160. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Quantification of integral radiation dose delivered during treatment for prostate cancer is lacking. We performed a comparative quantification of dose to nontarget body tissues delivered via 4 common radiation techniques: conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, pencil-beam scanning proton therapy, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plans for each radiation technique were generated for 10 patients with typical anatomy. For brachytherapy plans, virtual needles were placed to achieve standard dosimetry. Standard planning target volume margins or robustness margins were applied as appropriate. A "normal tissue" structure (entire computed tomography simulation volume minus planning target volume) was generated for integral dose computation. Dose-volume histogram parameters for targets and normal structures were tabulated. Normal tissue integral dose was calculated by multiplying normal tissue volume by mean dose.

RESULTS

Normal tissue integral dose was lowest for brachytherapy. Pencil-beam scanning protons, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and brachytherapy resulted in 17%, 57%, and 91% absolute reductions compared with standard volumetric modulated arc therapy, respectively. Mean nontarget tissues receiving 25%, 50%, and 75% of the prescription dose were reduced by 85%, 76%, and 83% for brachytherapy relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, by 79%, 64%, and 74% relative to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and 73%, 60%, and 81% relative to proton therapy. All reductions observed using brachytherapy were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose-rate brachytherapy is an effective technique for reducing dose to nontarget body tissues relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and pencil-beam scanning proton therapy.

摘要

目的

目前缺乏对前列腺癌治疗期间所输送的整体辐射剂量的量化。我们对通过4种常见放射技术输送到非靶身体组织的剂量进行了比较量化:传统容积调强弧形放疗、立体定向体部放疗、笔形束扫描质子治疗和高剂量率近距离放疗。

方法和材料

为10例具有典型解剖结构的患者生成了每种放射技术的计划。对于近距离放疗计划,放置虚拟针以实现标准剂量测定。酌情应用标准计划靶体积边界或稳健性边界。生成一个“正常组织”结构(整个计算机断层扫描模拟体积减去计划靶体积)用于整体剂量计算。列出靶区和正常结构的剂量体积直方图参数。通过将正常组织体积乘以平均剂量来计算正常组织整体剂量。

结果

近距离放疗的正常组织整体剂量最低。与标准容积调强弧形放疗相比,笔形束扫描质子治疗、立体定向体部放疗和近距离放疗导致的绝对剂量降低分别为17%、57%和91%。接受25%、50%和75%处方剂量的平均非靶组织相对于容积调强弧形放疗,近距离放疗分别减少了85%、76%和83%;相对于立体定向体部放疗分别减少了79%、64%和74%;相对于质子治疗分别减少了73%、60%和81%。使用近距离放疗观察到的所有降低均具有统计学意义。

结论

相对于容积调强弧形放疗、立体定向体部放疗和笔形束扫描质子治疗,高剂量率近距离放疗是一种减少非靶身体组织剂量的有效技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b699/9991537/21be36c3fc9b/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验