Mangan Sophie, Leech Michelle
Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2019 Oct 11;11:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.08.001. eCollection 2019 Sep.
Proton Therapy (PR) is an emerging treatment for prostate cancer (Pca) patients. However, limited and conflicting data exists regarding its ability to result in fewer bladder and rectal toxicities compared to Photon Therapy (PT), as well as its cost efficiency and plan robustness.
An electronic literature search was performed to acquire eligible studies published between 2007 and 2018. Studies comparing bladder and rectal dosimetry or Gastrointestinal (GI) and Genitourinary (GU) toxicities between PR and PT, the plan robustness of PR relative to motion and its cost efficiency for Pca patients were assessed.
28 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. PR resulted in improved bladder and rectal dosimetry but did not manifest as improved GI/GU toxicities clinically compared to PT. PR plans were considered robust when specific corrections, techniques, positioning or immobilisation devices were applied. PR is not cost effective for intermediate risk Pca patients; however PR may be cost effective for younger or high risk Pca patients.
PR offers improved bladder and rectal dosimetry compared to PT but this does not specifically translate to improved GI/GU toxicities clinically. The robustness of PR plans is acceptable under specific conditions. PR is not cost effective for all Pca patients.
质子治疗(PR)是一种针对前列腺癌(Pca)患者的新兴治疗方法。然而,与光子治疗(PT)相比,关于其能否减少膀胱和直肠毒性的数据有限且相互矛盾,同时其成本效益和计划稳健性也存在争议。
进行电子文献检索,以获取2007年至2018年间发表的符合条件的研究。评估比较PR和PT之间膀胱和直肠剂量测定或胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性、PR相对于运动的计划稳健性及其对Pca患者的成本效益的研究。
28项研究符合纳入本综述的条件。与PT相比,PR可改善膀胱和直肠剂量测定,但在临床上并未表现为改善GI/GU毒性。当应用特定的校正、技术、定位或固定装置时,PR计划被认为是稳健的。对于中度风险的Pca患者,PR不具有成本效益;然而,对于年轻或高风险的Pca患者,PR可能具有成本效益。
与PT相比,PR可改善膀胱和直肠剂量测定,但这并未在临床上特别转化为改善GI/GU毒性。在特定条件下,PR计划的稳健性是可接受的。PR并非对所有Pca患者都具有成本效益。