• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当信息安全取决于字体大小时:警告的显著性如何影响保护行为。

When information security depends on font size: how the saliency of warnings affects protection behavior.

作者信息

Ebert Nico, Ackermann Kurt A, Bearth Angela

机构信息

Center for Process Management & Information Security, Institute of Business Information Technology (IWI), ZHAW SML, Winterthur, Switzerland.

Center for Behavioral Insights & Pricing, Institute of Marketing Management (IMM), ZHAW SML.

出版信息

J Risk Res. 2022 Nov 14;26(3):233-255. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2022.2142952. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1080/13669877.2022.2142952
PMID:36896244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9988306/
Abstract

Prior research on how to improve the effectiveness of information security warnings has predominantly focused on either the informational content of warnings or their visual saliency. In an online experiment ( = 1'486), we disentangle the effect of both manipulations and demonstrate that both factors simultaneously influence decision making. Our data indicate that the proportion of people who engage in protection behavior can be increased by roughly 65% by making a particular warning message more visually salient (i.e. a more conspicuous visual design is used). We also show that varying the message's saliency can make people behave very differently when confronted with the same threat or behave very similarly when confronted with threats that differ widely in terms of severity of outcomes. Our results suggest that the visual design of a warning may warrant at least as much attention as the informational content that the warning message conveys.

摘要

先前关于如何提高信息安全警告有效性的研究主要集中在警告的信息内容或其视觉显著性上。在一项在线实验(n = 1486)中,我们剖析了这两种操作的效果,并证明这两个因素同时影响决策。我们的数据表明,通过使特定的警告信息在视觉上更加突出(即使用更显眼的视觉设计),采取保护行为的人数比例可以提高约65%。我们还表明,改变信息的显著性会使人们在面对相同威胁时表现出非常不同的行为,或者在面对结果严重程度差异很大的威胁时表现出非常相似的行为。我们的结果表明,警告的视觉设计可能至少与警告信息所传达的信息内容一样值得关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/9c68f10622c5/RJRR_A_2142952_F0006_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/9f8946f09f29/RJRR_A_2142952_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/d3390ef113e3/RJRR_A_2142952_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/6ebe794daedd/RJRR_A_2142952_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/11837ce6cf8b/RJRR_A_2142952_F0004_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/4cf35db74d70/RJRR_A_2142952_F0005_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/9c68f10622c5/RJRR_A_2142952_F0006_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/9f8946f09f29/RJRR_A_2142952_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/d3390ef113e3/RJRR_A_2142952_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/6ebe794daedd/RJRR_A_2142952_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/11837ce6cf8b/RJRR_A_2142952_F0004_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/4cf35db74d70/RJRR_A_2142952_F0005_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5b/9988306/9c68f10622c5/RJRR_A_2142952_F0006_C.jpg

相似文献

1
When information security depends on font size: how the saliency of warnings affects protection behavior.当信息安全取决于字体大小时:警告的显著性如何影响保护行为。
J Risk Res. 2022 Nov 14;26(3):233-255. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2022.2142952. eCollection 2023.
2
The Impact of Varying Warning Color on E-Cigarette Advertisements: Results From an Online Experiment Among Young Adults.不同警示颜色对电子烟广告的影响:一项针对年轻成年人的在线实验结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 18;23(9):1536-1541. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab043.
3
Optimizing Warnings on E-Cigarette Advertisements.优化电子烟广告警示语
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):630-637. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz091.
4
Standardised packs and larger health warnings: visual attention and perceptions among Colombian smokers and non-smokers.标准化包装和更大的健康警示:哥伦比亚吸烟者和非吸烟者的视觉注意和认知。
Addiction. 2022 Jun;117(6):1737-1747. doi: 10.1111/add.15779. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
5
Influence of package colour, branding and health warnings on appeal and perceived harm of cannabis products among respondents in Canada and the US.包装颜色、品牌和健康警示对加拿大和美国受访者对大麻产品吸引力和感知危害的影响。
Prev Med. 2021 Dec;153:106788. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106788. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
6
Recall of health warnings in smokeless tobacco ads.无烟烟草广告中健康警示的召回。
Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii59-63. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_2.ii59.
7
US young adults' perceived effectiveness of draft pictorial e-cigarette warning labels.美国青年对图形电子烟警示标签的感知有效性。
Tob Control. 2019 Aug;28(e1):e49-e51. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054802. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
8
Harnessing the Challenges and Solutions to Improve Security Warnings: A Review.利用挑战和解决方案提高安全警告:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 3;21(21):7313. doi: 10.3390/s21217313.
9
On the conceptual ambiguity surrounding perceived message effectiveness.关于围绕感知到的信息有效性的概念模糊性。
Health Commun. 2015;30(2):125-34. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.974131.
10
An experimental study of the effects of electronic cigarette warnings on young adult nonsmokers' perceptions and behavioral intentions.电子烟警告对年轻成年不吸烟者认知及行为意图影响的实验研究
Tob Induc Dis. 2016 May 26;14:17. doi: 10.1186/s12971-016-0083-x. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.视觉搜索中引导注意力的五个因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
2
Consumers' decision-making process when choosing potentially risky, frequently used chemical household products: The case of laundry detergents.消费者在选择潜在风险、常用化学家用产品时的决策过程:以洗衣液为例。
Environ Res. 2022 Jun;209:112894. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112894. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
3
Barriers to the safe use of chemical household products: A comparison across European countries.
安全使用家用化学品的障碍:欧洲国家的比较。
Environ Res. 2020 Jan;180:108859. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108859. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
4
Towards consensus on fear appeals: a rejoinder to the commentaries on Kok, Peters, Kessels, ten Hoor, and Ruiter (2018).关于恐惧诉求的共识:对关于科克、彼得斯、凯塞尔斯、滕胡尔和鲁伊特(2018年)评论的回应
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;12(2):151-156. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1454846. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
5
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1.恐惧诉求与态度改变的保护动机理论1。
J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803.
6
Consumers' Risk Perception of Household Cleaning and Washing Products.消费者对家用清洁洗涤产品的风险感知
Risk Anal. 2017 Apr;37(4):647-660. doi: 10.1111/risa.12635. Epub 2016 May 10.
7
Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories.诉诸恐惧:恐惧诉求效果与理论的元分析
Psychol Bull. 2015 Nov;141(6):1178-204. doi: 10.1037/a0039729.
8
Sixty years of fear appeal research: current state of the evidence.六十年来的恐惧诉求研究:现有证据状况。
Int J Psychol. 2014 Apr;49(2):63-70. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12042. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
9
Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.多选项漂移扩散模型预测了基于价值的决策中视觉注视点与选择之间的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13852-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101328108. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
10
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.视觉注视与简单选择中的价值计算和比较。
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Oct;13(10):1292-8. doi: 10.1038/nn.2635. Epub 2010 Sep 12.