• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助普通外科手术在学习曲线期间是安全的:澳大利亚 5 年经验。

Robot-assisted general surgery is safe during the learning curve: a 5-year Australian experience.

机构信息

University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.

Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1541-1546. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01560-8. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-023-01560-8
PMID:36897528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10374810/
Abstract

Robot-assisted general surgery has become increasingly common in the Australian public sector since 2003. It provides significant technical advantages compared to laparoscopic surgery. Currently, it is estimated that the learning curve for surgeons starting off with robotic surgery is complete after 15 cases. This is a retrospective case series, following the progress of four surgeons with minimal robotic experience over 5 years. Patients undergoing colorectal procedures and hernia repairs were included. 303 robotic cases were included in this study, 193 colorectal surgeries and 110 hernia repairs. 20.2% of colorectal patients experienced an adverse event and 10.0% of hernia patients had a complication. The learning curve was correlated to the average docking time, and it was found that this was complete after 2 years, or after a minimum of 12 to 15 cases. Patient length of stay decreases as surgeon experience increases. Robotic surgery is a safe approach to colorectal surgery and hernia repairs with some potential benefits in terms of patient outcomes as surgeon experience increases.

摘要

自 2003 年以来,机器人辅助普通外科手术在澳大利亚公共部门中越来越普遍。与腹腔镜手术相比,它具有显著的技术优势。目前,据估计,对于刚开始进行机器人手术的外科医生来说,学习曲线在完成 15 例手术后就结束了。这是一项回顾性病例系列研究,对 5 年内 4 名机器人手术经验最少的外科医生的进展进行了跟踪。本研究纳入了接受结直肠手术和疝修补术的患者。这项研究共纳入 303 例机器人手术病例,其中 193 例为结直肠手术,110 例为疝修补术。193 例结直肠手术患者中有 20.2%发生不良事件,110 例疝修补术患者中有 10.0%发生并发症。学习曲线与平均对接时间相关,结果发现,这在 2 年后或至少 12 到 15 例手术后就完成了。随着外科医生经验的增加,患者的住院时间减少。机器人手术是一种安全的结直肠手术和疝修补术方法,随着外科医生经验的增加,在患者预后方面可能具有一些潜在的优势。

相似文献

1
Robot-assisted general surgery is safe during the learning curve: a 5-year Australian experience.机器人辅助普通外科手术在学习曲线期间是安全的:澳大利亚 5 年经验。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1541-1546. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01560-8. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
2
The robotic learning curve for a newly appointed colorectal surgeon.新任命的结直肠外科医生的机器人学习曲线。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):73-78. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01400-1. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
3
Learning curve of robotic inguinal hernia repair in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon: a comparative study.经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生手中的机器人腹股沟疝修补术的学习曲线:一项对比研究。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1307-1312. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01362-w. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
4
Is the learning curve of the urology resident for conventional radical prostatectomy similar to that of staff initiating robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?对于传统根治性前列腺切除术,泌尿科住院医师的学习曲线是否与开始机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的医生相似?
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 May-Jun;50(3):335-345. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9909.
5
Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.腹腔镜直肠手术经验可减少机器人直肠切除术的学习曲线:累积和分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4067-4076. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5453-9. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
6
Robot-Assisted General Surgery Procedures at the Veterans Health Administration: A Comparison of Surgical Techniques.退伍军人事务部的机器人辅助普通外科手术:手术技术比较。
J Surg Res. 2022 Nov;279:330-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.032. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
7
Comparison of the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Between Senior and Junior Surgeons.比较资深和初级外科医生行机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术的学习曲线。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Apr;31(4):478-483. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0822. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
8
Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repairs.机器人辅助食管裂孔疝修补术学习曲线的累积求和分析
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3442-3450. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08665-x. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
9
Robotic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is feasible with no operative conversions during the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon developing a robotics program.对于有经验的腹腔镜外科医生来说,在开发机器人项目的学习曲线期间,进行机器人结肠切除术和腔内吻合术是可行的,没有手术转换。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Aug;13(4):545-555. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0895-1. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
10
Evaluation of the learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.机器人辅助腹腔镜下腹膜前突直肠固定术学习曲线的评估。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2096-2104. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08496-w. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery at the operational level: an investigation of surgeons' perspectives.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术在操作层面的比较:外科医生观点调查
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12152-y.
2
Assessing the learning curve in robot-assisted intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE) procedure: from Initial Learning to Mastery.评估机器人辅助体内结直肠吻合术和经直肠取出术(NICE)的学习曲线:从初步学习到熟练掌握。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 17;19(1):300. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02467-2.
3
Learning Curve on Lymph Nodes Retrieval and Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay in Robotic Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective, Observational Study.机器人直肠癌手术中淋巴结清扫及术后住院时间的学习曲线:一项回顾性观察研究
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;8(5):e70759. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70759. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
The Comparison of eTEP and IPOM in Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.eTEP 与 IPOM 在腹疝和切口疝修补中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Jan 17;32(2):252-258. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001035.
2
Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes in Mid and Low Rectal Cancer With Robotic Surgery.机器人手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 9;11:603073. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.603073. eCollection 2021.
3
Whither robotic colorectal surgery?机器人结直肠手术何去何从?
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jul;90(7-8):1230-1232. doi: 10.1111/ans.16067.
4
Robotic colorectal surgery in Australia: evolution over a decade.澳大利亚的机器人结直肠手术:十余年的发展历程。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Nov;91(11):2330-2336. doi: 10.1111/ans.16554. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
Robotic colorectal cancer surgery in China: a nationwide retrospective observational study.中国的机器人结直肠癌手术:一项全国性回顾性观察研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6591-6603. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08157-4. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
6
Robotic Colorectal Surgery.机器人结直肠手术。
Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):337-360. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer.机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的短期疗效比较
Surg Innov. 2019 Feb;26(1):57-65. doi: 10.1177/1553350618797822. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
8
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis.老年患者机器人手术与腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的倾向评分匹配分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Nov;28(11):1334-1345. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0115. Epub 2018 May 31.
9
Robotic Colorectal Surgery Learning Curve and Case Complexity.机器人结直肠手术学习曲线与病例复杂性
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1163-1168. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0411. Epub 2018 May 7.
10
Higher robotic colorectal surgery volume improves outcomes.机器人结直肠手术量越高,结果越好。
Am J Surg. 2018 May;215(5):874-878. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.042. Epub 2018 Jan 31.