Department of Clinical & Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Forma Therapeutics, Watertown, MA.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2023 May 1;45(4):e433-e440. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002636. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
Caregivers of youth with sickle cell disease (SCD) influence the youth disease management and psychosocial outcomes. Effective caregiver coping is important for improving disease management and outcomes since caregivers often report high disease-related parenting stress. This study characterizes caregiver coping and examines its relation to youth clinic nonattendance and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Participants were 63 youth with SCD and their caregivers. Caregivers completed the Responses to Stress Questionnaire-SCD module to assess primary control engagement (PCE; attempts to change stressors or reactions to stress), secondary control engagement (SCE; strategies to adapt to stress), and disengagement (avoidance) coping. Youth with SCD completed the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory-SCD module. Medical records were reviewed for the hematology appointment nonattendance rates. Coping factors were significantly different ( F [1.837, 113.924]=86.071, P <0.001); caregivers reported more PCE ( M =2.75, SD =0.66) and SCE ( M =2.78, SD =0.66) than disengagement ( M =1.75, SD =0.54) coping. Responses to short-answer questions corroborated this pattern. Greater caregiver PCE coping was associated with lower youth nonattendance (β=-0.28, P =0.050), and greater caregiver SCE coping was related to higher youth HRQOL (β=0.28, P =0.045). Caregiver coping is related to improved clinic attendance and HRQOL in pediatric SCD. Providers should assess caregiver coping styles and consider encouraging engagement coping.
照顾患有镰状细胞病 (SCD) 的年轻人的人会影响年轻人的疾病管理和心理社会结果。有效的照顾者应对方式对于改善疾病管理和结果很重要,因为照顾者经常报告与疾病相关的育儿压力很大。本研究描述了照顾者的应对方式,并探讨了其与青年诊所就诊率和健康相关生活质量 (HRQOL) 的关系。参与者为 63 名患有 SCD 的青少年及其照顾者。照顾者完成了应激反应问卷-SCD 模块,以评估主要控制参与 (PCE;试图改变压力源或对压力的反应)、次要控制参与 (SCE;适应压力的策略) 和脱离 (回避) 应对。患有 SCD 的青少年完成了儿科生活质量清单-SCD 模块。查阅了血液学预约未就诊率的医疗记录。应对因素存在显著差异( F [1.837, 113.924]=86.071, P <0.001);与脱离应对( M =1.75, SD =0.54)相比,照顾者报告了更多的 PCE( M =2.75, SD =0.66)和 SCE( M =2.78, SD =0.66)应对。对简短回答问题的回答证实了这一模式。照顾者的 PCE 应对能力越强,青少年就诊率越低(β=-0.28, P =0.050),照顾者的 SCE 应对能力越强,青少年的 HRQOL 越高(β=0.28, P =0.045)。照顾者的应对方式与儿科 SCD 中改善的就诊率和 HRQOL 相关。提供者应评估照顾者的应对方式,并考虑鼓励参与应对。