Ryu Na-Gyeong, Baek Eun-Jin, Kim Min-Jae, Kim Kwang-Il
Department of Aquatic Life Medicine, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;13(5):943. doi: 10.3390/ani13050943.
Iron flocculation is widely used to concentrate viruses in water, followed by Fe-virus flocculate formation, collection, and elution. In the elution stage, an oxalic or ascorbic acid re-suspension buffer dissolved iron hydroxide. After the concentration of viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) in seawater (1 × 10 to 1 × 10 viral genome copies or plaque-forming unit (PFU)/mL), the recovery yield of the viral genome using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and viral infectivity using the plaque assay were investigated to evaluate the validity of the two re-suspension buffers to concentrate VHSV. The mean viral genome recovery yield with oxalic and ascorbic acid was 71.2 ± 12.3% and 81.4 ± 9.5%, respectively. The mean viral infective recovery yields based on the PFU were significantly different between the two buffers at 23.8 ± 22.7% (oxalic acid) and 4.4 ± 2.7% (ascorbic acid). Notably, although oxalic acid maintains viral infectivity over 60% at a viral concentration above 10 PFU/mL, the infective VHSVs were not sufficiently recovered at a low viral concentration (10 PFU/mL, <10%). To support this result, concentrated VHSV was inoculated in Epithelioma papulosum cyprini (EPC) cells to confirm cell viability, viral gene expression, and extracellular viral titer. All results demonstrated that oxalic acid buffer was superior to ascorbic acid buffer in preserving viral infectivity.
铁絮凝法被广泛用于浓缩水中的病毒,随后形成铁-病毒絮凝物、进行收集和洗脱。在洗脱阶段,用草酸或抗坏血酸重悬缓冲液溶解氢氧化铁。在对海水中的病毒性出血性败血症病毒(VHSV)进行浓缩(1×10至1×10病毒基因组拷贝数或蚀斑形成单位(PFU)/毫升)后,使用定量实时聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)研究病毒基因组的回收率,并使用蚀斑试验研究病毒感染性,以评估两种重悬缓冲液浓缩VHSV的有效性。草酸和抗坏血酸的平均病毒基因组回收率分别为71.2±12.3%和81.4±9.5%。基于PFU的两种缓冲液的平均病毒感染性回收率存在显著差异,分别为23.8±22.7%(草酸)和4.4±2.7%(抗坏血酸)。值得注意的是,尽管在病毒浓度高于10 PFU/毫升时草酸能使病毒感染性保持在60%以上,但在低病毒浓度(10 PFU/毫升,<10%)下,感染性VHSV未能充分回收。为支持这一结果,将浓缩的VHSV接种到鲤上皮瘤细胞(EPC)中,以确认细胞活力、病毒基因表达和细胞外病毒滴度。所有结果表明,在保持病毒感染性方面,草酸缓冲液优于抗坏血酸缓冲液。