• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响恋爱关系的因素——年龄、性满意度、关系长度和人际亲密程度对年轻人恋爱关系满意度的预测。

What Matters in a Relationship-Age, Sexual Satisfaction, Relationship Length, and Interpersonal Closeness as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction in Young Adults.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Pedagogical University of Krakow, Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Krakow, Poland.

Students Scientific Club ControlUP, Pedagogical University of Krakow, Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4103. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054103.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20054103
PMID:36901114
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10001731/
Abstract

Relationship satisfaction is one of the key elements affecting overall life satisfaction. This study aimed to identify significant predictors of relationship satisfaction in young adults in a romantic relationship. The study was questionnaire-based, involving 237 young adults who were currently in a relationship. Three self-rating scales were used: CSI-32 Relationship Satisfaction Scale, Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire, and Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale. Sexual satisfaction proved to be a main predictor of relationship satisfaction in both sexes. For women, interpersonal closeness was additionally important, with a sense of closeness found to be even more important than sexual satisfaction for women cohabiting with their partners. Cohabiting people are generally more satisfied with their relationship, and a higher level of closeness and applied caresses can additionally be observed in them. In contrast, the relationship length appeared to matter only for men living with their partner: they were more satisfied with the relationship at the beginning of the relationship, and then their level of satisfaction declined. Relationship satisfaction in young adults appears to be determined by other factors depending on gender and cohabitation status. Nevertheless, at this age, sexual satisfaction proves to be one of the most critical factors for a sense of relationship satisfaction.

摘要

关系满意度是影响整体生活满意度的关键因素之一。本研究旨在确定处于恋爱关系中的年轻成年人关系满意度的显著预测因素。该研究采用问卷调查的形式,涉及 237 名目前处于恋爱关系中的年轻人。使用了三种自评量表:CSI-32 关系满意度量表、性满意度问卷和一维关系亲密量表。性满意度被证明是两性关系满意度的主要预测因素。对于女性来说,人际关系的亲密程度更为重要,与伴侣同居的女性发现亲密感甚至比性满意度更为重要。同居的人通常对他们的关系更满意,并且在他们之间还可以观察到更高程度的亲密感和应用的抚摸。相比之下,关系长度似乎只对与伴侣同居的男性重要:他们在关系开始时对关系更满意,然后满意度下降。年轻成年人的关系满意度似乎取决于性别和同居状况等其他因素。然而,在这个年龄段,性满意度被证明是关系满意度的一个关键因素。

相似文献

1
What Matters in a Relationship-Age, Sexual Satisfaction, Relationship Length, and Interpersonal Closeness as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction in Young Adults.影响恋爱关系的因素——年龄、性满意度、关系长度和人际亲密程度对年轻人恋爱关系满意度的预测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4103. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054103.
2
Selected Predictors of the Sense of Intimacy in Relationships of Young Adults.年轻人恋爱关系中亲密感的预测因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 13;16(22):4447. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224447.
3
Single and Multiple Orgasm Experience Among Women in Heterosexual Partnerships. Results of the German Health and Sexuality Survey (GeSiD).异性恋伴侣关系中女性的单一性高潮和多重性高潮体验。德国健康与性调查(GeSiD)的结果。
J Sex Med. 2021 Dec;18(12):2028-2038. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
4
Association between Sexual Satisfaction and Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents and Young Adults.青少年和年轻人的性满意度与抑郁和焦虑之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 29;17(3):841. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030841.
5
An Explanatory Model of Sexual Satisfaction in Adults with a Same-Sex Partner: An Analysis Based on Gender Differences.与同性伴侣的成年人的性满足解释模型:基于性别的差异分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 13;17(10):3393. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103393.
6
Preliminary Evidence for a Relationship Between Physiological Synchrony and Sexual Satisfaction in Opposite-Sex Couples.初步证据表明,异性伴侣之间的生理同步与性满足之间存在关系。
J Sex Med. 2019 Dec;16(12):2000-2010. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.09.023. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
7
Does fat talk affect relationship and sexual satisfaction?: Adults' perceptions of fat talk in a fictional romantic relationship.胖谈是否会影响人际关系和性满足感?:成年人对虚构浪漫关系中胖谈的看法。
Eat Behav. 2022 Apr;45:101603. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2022.101603. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
8
Closeness Discrepancies and Relationship Quality in German Partnered Women and Men.德国伴侣女性和男性的亲密差距与关系质量。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2024;50(6):757-772. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2024.2360980. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
9
An Interpersonal Investigation of Sexual Self-Schemas.性自我图式的人际调查
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Feb;45(2):281-90. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0638-6. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
10
Sexual Closeness Discrepancies: What They Are and Why They Matter for Sexual Well-Being in Romantic Relationships.性亲密差异:其内涵及对浪漫关系中性福祉的重要性
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Nov;46(8):2353-2364. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-0960-2. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between weight stigma and mental well-being among people in romantic relationships: an actor-partner interdependence model investigation.恋爱关系中体重歧视与心理健康之间的关联:一项行为者-伴侣相互依赖模型调查。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 6;16:1576406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1576406. eCollection 2025.
2
The Attachment Type, Relationship Characteristics, and Sexual Function of Women: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Analysis.女性的依恋类型、关系特征与性功能:横断面分析的见解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 18;22(5):794. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050794.
3
The Impact of Stress on Women's Sexuality in the First Months After Childbirth-A Pilot Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.压力对产后头几个月女性性取向的影响——一项试点横断面比较研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 27;14(3):847. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030847.
4
Sexual Dysfunctions in Breastfeeding Females: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.哺乳期女性的性功能障碍:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 22;14(3):691. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030691.
5
Factors Predicting Sexual Satisfaction of Thai Women with Cervical Cancer After Complete Treatment at Least One Year and Their Spouses.泰国宫颈癌患者及其配偶在完成至少一年的治疗后性满意度的预测因素
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;13(2):112. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020112.
6
Exploring how attachment insecurities mediate the link between sexual and partnership satisfaction in adolescents and young adults with cancer.探索依恋不安全感如何在患有癌症的青少年和年轻人的性满意度与伴侣关系满意度之间的联系中起中介作用。
Acta Oncol. 2025 Jan 21;64:96-104. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42110.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the abbreviated Hungarian Faking Orgasm Scale for Women.匈牙利女性性高潮伪装简化量表的心理测量评估。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 12;15:1513959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1513959. eCollection 2024.
8
Sexual Excitation in Young Women with Different Levels of Sexual Satisfaction in Relationships: A Laboratory Study.处于不同恋爱关系性满意度水平的年轻女性的性唤起:一项实验室研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 2;14(9):769. doi: 10.3390/bs14090769.
9
The Roles of Frequency of Pornography Use, and Moral Incongruence in the Relationship Between Sexual Satisfaction, and Psychological Distress Related to the Use of Pornography: A Moderated Mediation Model.色情内容使用频率以及道德不一致性在性满意度与色情内容使用相关心理困扰关系中的作用:一个有调节的中介模型
Int J Sex Health. 2024 Jun 4;36(3):329-342. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2349592. eCollection 2024.
10
Positive sexuality, relationship satisfaction, and health: a network analysis.积极的性取向、关系满意度与健康:一项网络分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 6;15:1420148. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420148. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of relationship satisfaction across the life span: A systematic review and meta-analysis.一生中关系满意度的发展:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2021 Oct;147(10):1012-1053. doi: 10.1037/bul0000342. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
2
Trends in cohabitation and implications for children s family contexts in the United States.美国同居趋势及其对儿童家庭环境的影响。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2000 Jan;54(1):29-41. doi: 10.1080/713779060.
3
Trends in Cohabitation Outcomes: Compositional Changes and Engagement Among Never-Married Young Adults.同居结果的趋势:未婚年轻人中的构成变化与参与情况
J Marriage Fam. 2014 Aug;76(4):826-842. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12123. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
4
Commitment in different relationships statuses: validation study of the personal commitment scale.不同恋爱关系状态下的承诺:个人承诺量表的效度研究
Span J Psychol. 2015 Jun 3;18:E34. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.35.
5
A Meta-Analysis of the Relations Between Three Types of Peer Norms and Adolescent Sexual Behavior.三种同伴规范与青少年性行为关系的荟萃分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 Aug;19(3):203-34. doi: 10.1177/1088868314544223. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
6
Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction.夫妻沟通、情感和性亲密以及关系满意度。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(4):275-93. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2012.751072. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
7
Social network changes and life events across the life span: a meta-analysis.社会网络变化与生命周期中的生活事件:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jan;139(1):53-80. doi: 10.1037/a0028601. Epub 2012 May 28.
8
The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS): reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of relationship closeness.单维关系亲近度量表(URCS):一种新的关系亲近度测量工具的信度和效度证据。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):565-72. doi: 10.1037/a0026265. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
9
Sexual and relationship satisfaction among heterosexual men and women: the importance of desired frequency of sex.异性恋男女的性和关系满意度:期望的性频率的重要性。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2011;37(2):104-15. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.560531.
10
Regulating partners in intimate relationships: the costs and benefits of different communication strategies.调节亲密关系中的伴侣:不同沟通策略的成本与收益
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Mar;96(3):620-39. doi: 10.1037/a0012961.