• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 GRI 标准的韩国建筑业全球可持续性研究。

Study on the Global Sustainability of the Korean Construction Industry Based on the GRI Standards.

机构信息

Department of Architecture, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Republic of Korea.

Department of Construction Policy Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si 10223, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(5):4231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054231.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20054231
PMID:36901242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10001823/
Abstract

This study began with the increasing importance of ESG through sustainable management evaluation across all industries, predicting market demand through the ESG management paradigm and financial environment changes in the global industry, and establishing international strategies for the construction industry. Compared to other industries, the construction industry is in the early stages of ESG formation, and it is unclear how to expand its base by establishing evaluation system standards such as innovation of individual services, interaction of social capital, and definition of stakeholders. Currently, some large construction companies in the construction industry are publishing sustainability management reports at the group level, but given the recently strengthened global sustainability of ESG by GRI Standards, efficient analysis of global construction markets and strategic orders are needed. Therefore, this study focuses on assessing the sustainability strategies and directions of the construction industry from an ESG perspective. To this end, sustainability issues and insights, as well as global issues in Korea and the worldwide construction sector, were analyzed. The analysis showed that global construction companies were highly interested in business management approaches, such as safety and health, as critical issues regarding the construction industry's sustainability strategy. In contrast, South Korean construction companies prioritize business values such as value creation, fair trade, and win-win. Both global and South Korean construction companies have been working on greenhouse gas reduction and energy sustainability. Regarding other issues, cultivating construction specialists, enhancing the job training system, and limiting serious accidents and safety mishaps were all significant from a social standpoint among South Korean construction companies. Conversely, global construction companies appeared to focus on issues related to ethical and environmental management from an organizational standpoint.

摘要

本研究从所有行业通过可持续管理评估对 ESG 的重视程度不断提高开始,通过 ESG 管理范式和全球产业金融环境变化预测市场需求,并为建筑行业建立国际战略。与其他行业相比,建筑行业处于 ESG 形成的早期阶段,如何通过建立评估体系标准(如个别服务的创新、社会资本的互动和利益相关者的定义)来扩大其基础尚不清楚。目前,建筑行业的一些大型建筑公司正在集团层面发布可持续性管理报告,但鉴于 GRI 标准最近加强了 ESG 的全球可持续性,需要对全球建筑市场和战略订单进行有效的分析。因此,本研究从 ESG 角度关注评估建筑行业的可持续性战略和方向。为此,分析了可持续性问题和见解,以及韩国和全球建筑部门的全球问题。分析表明,全球建筑公司对业务管理方法(如安全和健康)非常感兴趣,因为这些方法是建筑行业可持续性战略的关键问题。相比之下,韩国建筑公司更注重商业价值,如创造价值、公平贸易和双赢。全球和韩国的建筑公司都在努力减少温室气体排放和能源可持续性。关于其他问题,培养建筑专业人员、加强工作培训系统以及限制严重事故和安全事故在韩国建筑公司中从社会角度来看都是非常重要的。相反,从组织角度来看,全球建筑公司似乎更关注与道德和环境管理相关的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d145/10001823/fecf9b363f58/ijerph-20-04231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d145/10001823/fecf9b363f58/ijerph-20-04231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d145/10001823/fecf9b363f58/ijerph-20-04231-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Study on the Global Sustainability of the Korean Construction Industry Based on the GRI Standards.基于 GRI 标准的韩国建筑业全球可持续性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(5):4231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054231.
2
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance.环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效与财务成果:分析ESG对财务绩效的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118829. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
3
Sustainability and Financial Accounting: a Critical Review on the ESG Dynamics.可持续性与财务会计:ESG 动态的批判性回顾。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(11):16758-16761. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18596-2. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
The performance frontier: innovating for a sustainable strategy.绩效前沿:创新实现可持续战略。
Harv Bus Rev. 2013 May;91(5):50-6, 58, 60, 150.
5
Strategic management and organizational culture of medical device companies in relation to corporate performance.医疗器械公司的战略管理和组织文化与企业绩效的关系。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):781-792. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2224168.
6
Assessing the Effect of Dynamic Capabilities on the ESG Reporting and Corporate Performance Relationship With Topic Modeling: Evidence From Global Companies.运用主题建模评估动态能力对企业环境、社会和治理(ESG)报告与企业绩效关系的影响:来自全球公司的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 May 11;13:898935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.898935. eCollection 2022.
7
The Sustainability Journey of Chinese Ready-Meal Companies Going Global: Configurational Analysis Using the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework.中国即食食品企业全球化的可持续发展历程:基于技术-组织-环境框架的组态分析
Foods. 2024 Jul 17;13(14):2251. doi: 10.3390/foods13142251.
8
Identifying ESG types of Chinese solid waste disposal companies based on machine learning methods.基于机器学习方法的中国固体废物处理公司的 ESG 类型识别。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;360:121235. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121235. Epub 2024 May 25.
9
The inclusion of biodiversity into Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework: A strategic integration of ecocentric extinction accounting.将生物多样性纳入环境、社会和治理(ESG)框架:以生态为中心的灭绝核算的战略整合。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;351:119808. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119808. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
10
Occupational health and safety of multinational construction companies through evaluation of corporate social responsibility reports.跨国建筑公司的职业健康与安全:通过企业社会责任报告评估。
J Safety Res. 2022 Jun;81:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Feb 3.