• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用新方法和工具对复杂健康状况人群的病例管理模式进行的实际评估——哪些有效、针对哪些人群、在哪些情况下有效?

A Realist Evaluation of Case Management Models for People with Complex Health Conditions Using Novel Methods and Tools-What Works, for Whom, and under What Circumstances?

机构信息

Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra 2617, Australia.

Lukersmith & Associates, Sydney 2777, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4362. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054362.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20054362
PMID:36901374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10002263/
Abstract

Case management developed from a generalist model to a person-centred model aligned with the evidence-informed evolution of best practice people-centred integrated care. Case management is a multidimensional and collaborative integrated care strategy where the case manager performs a set of interventions/actions to support the person with a complex health condition to progress in their recovery pathway and participate in life roles. It is currently unknown what case management model works in real life for whom and under what circumstances. The purpose of this study was to answer these questions. The study methods used realistic evaluation framework, examined the patterns and associations between case manager actions (mechanisms), the person's characteristics and environment (context), and recovery (outcomes) over 10 years post severe injury. There was mixed methods secondary analysis of data extracted via in-depth retrospective file reviews ( = 107). We used international frameworks and a novel approach with multi-layered analysis including machine learning and expert guidance for pattern identification. The study results confirm that when provided, a person-centred case management model contributes to and enhances the person's recovery and progress towards participation in life roles and maintaining well-being after severe injury.Furthermore, the intensity of case management for people with traumatic brain injury, and the person-centred actions of advising, emotional and motivational support, and proactive coordination contribute to the person achieving their goals. The results provide learnings for case management services on the case management models, for quality appraisal, service planning, and informs further research on case management.

摘要

病例管理已从通才模式发展为以人为本的模式,与循证最佳实践以人为本的综合护理的发展保持一致。病例管理是一种多维和协作的综合护理策略,其中病例管理员执行一系列干预措施/行动,以支持患有复杂健康状况的人在其康复途径中取得进展并参与生活角色。目前尚不清楚在现实生活中,针对谁以及在什么情况下,哪种病例管理模式有效。本研究旨在回答这些问题。该研究方法使用现实评估框架,在严重损伤后 10 年期间,检查病例管理员的行动(机制)、人与环境(背景)的特征和恢复(结果)之间的模式和关联。通过深入的回顾性文件审查(=107)提取数据进行了混合方法二次分析。我们使用了国际框架和一种新颖的方法,包括机器学习和专家指导的多层次分析,用于识别模式。研究结果证实,在提供病例管理服务时,以人为本的病例管理模式有助于促进严重损伤后患者的康复和参与生活角色的进度,并维持其幸福感。此外,创伤性脑损伤患者病例管理的强度以及提供建议、情感和动机支持以及主动协调等以人为本的病例管理行动有助于患者实现目标。研究结果为病例管理服务提供了病例管理模式、质量评估、服务规划方面的经验教训,并为病例管理的进一步研究提供了信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10002263/ebdc5991f7f9/ijerph-20-04362-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10002263/216d8f717ca3/ijerph-20-04362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10002263/ee02ceaad192/ijerph-20-04362-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10002263/056203422d26/ijerph-20-04362-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10002263/28916c59d2f4/ijerph-20-04362-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10002263/ebdc5991f7f9/ijerph-20-04362-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10002263/216d8f717ca3/ijerph-20-04362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10002263/ee02ceaad192/ijerph-20-04362-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10002263/056203422d26/ijerph-20-04362-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10002263/28916c59d2f4/ijerph-20-04362-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10002263/ebdc5991f7f9/ijerph-20-04362-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Realist Evaluation of Case Management Models for People with Complex Health Conditions Using Novel Methods and Tools-What Works, for Whom, and under What Circumstances?采用新方法和工具对复杂健康状况人群的病例管理模式进行的实际评估——哪些有效、针对哪些人群、在哪些情况下有效?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4362. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054362.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
Developing New Methods for Person-Centred Approaches to Adjudicate Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations in Realist Evaluation.发展新方法,以实现以人为中心的方法,对现实主义评价中的情境-机制-结果配置进行裁决。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;19(4):2370. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042370.
5
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
6
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
The brain injury case management taxonomy (BICM-T); a classification of community-based case management interventions for a common language.脑损伤病例管理分类法(BICM-T);一种用于通用语言的基于社区的病例管理干预措施分类。
Disabil Health J. 2016 Apr;9(2):272-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Proof of concept studies in mental health systems research: strategy and steps.心理健康系统研究中的概念验证研究:策略与步骤。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2025 Aug 19;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13033-025-00682-w.
2
The Integrated Atlas of Dementia Care in the Australian Capital Territory: A Collective Case Study of Local Service Provision.澳大利亚首都地区痴呆症护理综合地图集:地方服务提供的集体案例研究
Health Serv Insights. 2024 Feb 11;17:11786329241232254. doi: 10.1177/11786329241232254. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
What Does It Take to Get Somebody Back to Work after Severe Acquired Brain Injury? Service Actions within the Vocational Intervention Program (VIP 2.0).重度颅脑损伤后让某人重返工作岗位需要什么?职业干预计划(VIP 2.0)中的服务行动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9548. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159548.
2
Effectiveness of More Personalized, Case-Managed, and Multicomponent Treatment for Patients with Severe Schizophrenia Compared to the Standard Treatment: A Ten-Year Follow-Up.与标准治疗相比,针对重度精神分裂症患者的更个性化、病例管理和多组分治疗的有效性:十年随访
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 4;12(7):1101. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071101.
3
A systematic review on integrated care for traumatic brain injury, mental health, and substance use.
创伤性脑损伤、精神健康和物质使用的综合护理系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 3;17(3):e0264116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264116. eCollection 2022.
4
Vagueness and Ambiguity in Communication of Case Management: A Content Analysis in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme.病例管理沟通中的模糊性与歧义性:澳大利亚国家残疾保险计划的内容分析
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5590.
5
Patients' and caregivers' perspectives on healthcare navigation in Central Indiana, USA after brain injury.美国印第安纳州中部脑损伤后医疗导航的患者和护理人员观点。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 May;30(3):988-997. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13275. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
Case management after acquired brain injury compared to care as usual: study protocol for a 2-year pragmatic randomized controlled superiority trial with two parallel groups.脑外伤后病例管理与常规护理相比:一项为期 2 年的实用随机对照优势试验的研究方案,设有 2 个平行组。
Trials. 2020 Nov 17;21(1):928. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04804-2.
7
The Association Between Fault Attribution and Work Participation After Road Traffic Injury: A Registry-Based Observational Study.道路交通事故伤害后归因与工作参与之间的关联:基于登记的观察性研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Jun;30(2):235-254. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09867-w.
8
Care coordination experiences of people with traumatic brain injury and their family members in the 4-years after injury: a qualitative analysis.创伤性脑损伤患者及其家庭成员受伤后4年的护理协调经历:一项定性分析
Brain Inj. 2019;33(5):574-583. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1566835. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
9
Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity.创伤性脑损伤后的非正式护理管理:非正式护理者工作量和能力的观点。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Mar;42(6):754-762. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1508511. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
10
Use of the self-organising map network (SOMNet) as a decision support system for regional mental health planning.使用自组织映射网络(SOMNet)作为区域心理健康规划的决策支持系统。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Apr 25;16(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0308-y.