• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我的家庭对我很重要:工作家庭冲突如何导致亲家庭不道德行为。

My Family Accounts Much for Me: How Does Work-to-Family Conflict Lead to Unethical Pro-Family Behavior.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.

Shandong Institute of Talent Development Strategy, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054368.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20054368
PMID:36901377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10001610/
Abstract

Although unethical behaviors are prevalent in the workplace, little is known about the unethical behavior aiming at benefiting one's family (unethical pro-family behavior, UPFB). In this paper, we leverage self-determination theory to explore the association between work-to-family conflict and UPFB. Specifically, we hypothesize and corroborate a positive relationship between work-to-family conflict and UPFB, and such relationship is mediated by family motivation. Moreover, we identify two conditional factors, guilt proneness (at first stage) and ethical leadership (at second stage), in moderating the proposed relationship. In study 1 (scenario-based experiment, = 118), we tested the causality of work-to-family conflict and intention to perform UPFB. In study 2 (field study, = 255), we tested our hypotheses by employing a three-wave time-lagged survey design. As expected, results from two studies fully supported our predictions. Overall, we explain whether, how, and when work-to-family conflict will lead to UPFB. Implications of theory and practice are then discussed.

摘要

虽然职场不道德行为很普遍,但人们对旨在使家人受益的不道德行为(不道德的亲族行为,UPFB)知之甚少。在本文中,我们利用自我决定理论来探讨工作家庭冲突与 UPFB 之间的关系。具体而言,我们假设并证实了工作家庭冲突与 UPFB 之间的正相关关系,并且这种关系是由家庭动机介导的。此外,我们确定了两个调节因素,内疚倾向(第一阶段)和道德领导力(第二阶段),以调节所提出的关系。在研究 1(基于情景的实验,n=118)中,我们测试了工作家庭冲突与执行 UPFB 的意图之间的因果关系。在研究 2(实地研究,n=255)中,我们通过采用三波时间滞后调查设计来检验我们的假设。正如预期的那样,两项研究的结果完全支持了我们的预测。总的来说,我们解释了工作家庭冲突将如何、何时以及如何导致 UPFB。然后讨论了理论和实践的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ee9/10001610/63eb2e2d4e40/ijerph-20-04368-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ee9/10001610/e280ea1a1f55/ijerph-20-04368-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ee9/10001610/d231c20d71df/ijerph-20-04368-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ee9/10001610/ec135c5f7f75/ijerph-20-04368-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ee9/10001610/6c3dfc53ea32/ijerph-20-04368-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ee9/10001610/63eb2e2d4e40/ijerph-20-04368-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ee9/10001610/e280ea1a1f55/ijerph-20-04368-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ee9/10001610/d231c20d71df/ijerph-20-04368-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ee9/10001610/ec135c5f7f75/ijerph-20-04368-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ee9/10001610/6c3dfc53ea32/ijerph-20-04368-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ee9/10001610/63eb2e2d4e40/ijerph-20-04368-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
My Family Accounts Much for Me: How Does Work-to-Family Conflict Lead to Unethical Pro-Family Behavior.我的家庭对我很重要:工作家庭冲突如何导致亲家庭不道德行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054368.
2
Work-Family Conflict and Unethical Pro-family Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Threat Appraisal and the Moderating Effect of Family Collectivism Orientation.工作-家庭冲突与不道德的亲家庭行为:威胁评估的中介作用与家庭集体主义取向的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 18;13:951904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951904. eCollection 2022.
3
Can leader self-sacrificial behavior inhibit unethical pro-family behavior? A personal identification perspective.领导者的自我牺牲行为能抑制不道德的亲家族行为吗?一种个人认同视角。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1078122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1078122. eCollection 2022.
4
Heroes or Villains? The Dark Side of Charismatic Leadership and Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior.英雄还是恶棍?魅力型领导和不道德的亲组织行为的阴暗面。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 31;17(15):5546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155546.
5
Impact of relational leadership on employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior: A survey based on tourism companies in four countries.关系型领导对员工不道德亲组织行为的影响:基于四国旅游企业的调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 9;14(12):e0225706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225706. eCollection 2019.
6
Unethical pro-supervisor behavior and employees' family satisfaction: The roles of workplace ostracism and work-home segmentation preference.不道德的上级行为与员工的家庭满意度:职场排斥和工作-家庭分割偏好的作用。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Jun 8:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04724-9.
7
An Unethical Organizational Behavior for the Sake of the Family: Perceived Risk of Job Insecurity, Family Motivation and Financial Pressures.为了家庭而采取不道德的组织行为:对工作不安全的感知风险、家庭动机和经济压力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 27;19(11):6541. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116541.
8
The hidden dark side of empowering leadership: The moderating role of hindrance stressors in explaining when empowering employees can promote moral disengagement and unethical pro-organizational behavior.授权型领导的隐性阴暗面:阻碍压力源在解释何时授权员工会促进道德脱离和不道德的亲组织行为方面的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Dec;107(12):2220-2242. doi: 10.1037/apl0001013. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
9
The Relationship Between Proactive Behavior and Work-Family Conflict: A Moderated Mediation Model.积极行为与工作-家庭冲突之间的关系:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 3;12:657863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657863. eCollection 2021.
10
Influence of Self-Sacrificial Leadership on the Pro-Organizational Unethical Behavior of Employees: A Moderated Mediating Model.自我牺牲型领导对员工亲组织不道德行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Dec 30;14:2245-2255. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S339718. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A Theory of Guilt Appeals: A Review Showing the Importance of Investigating Cognitive Processes as Mediators between Emotion and Behavior.内疚诉求理论:一项综述表明研究认知过程作为情感与行为之间中介的重要性。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2019 Nov 20;9(12):117. doi: 10.3390/bs9120117.
2
The double-edged sword of leader humility: Investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance.领导者谦逊的双刃剑:探究领导者谦逊促进或抑制下属越轨行为的时间及原因。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Jul;105(7):693-712. doi: 10.1037/apl0000456. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
3
Clarifying the link between job satisfaction and absenteeism: The role of guilt proneness.
明确工作满意度与旷工之间的联系:内疚易感性的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jun;102(6):982-992. doi: 10.1037/apl0000208. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Empathy, Guilt Proneness, and Gender: Relative Contributions to Prosocial Behaviour.同理心、内疚倾向与性别:对亲社会行为的相对贡献
Eur J Psychol. 2016 May 31;12(2):260-70. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i2.1097. eCollection 2016 May.
5
Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior.放松道德推理以取胜:组织认同如何与不道德的亲组织行为相关。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Aug;101(8):1082-96. doi: 10.1037/apl0000111. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
6
Work-family conflict, emotional exhaustion, and displaced aggression toward others: the moderating roles of workplace interpersonal conflict and perceived managerial family support.工作家庭冲突、情绪耗竭与对他人的替代性攻击:工作场所人际冲突和感知到的管理层家庭支持的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 May;100(3):793-808. doi: 10.1037/a0038387. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
7
Unethical for the sake of the group: risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior.为了群体而不道德:社会排斥风险和亲群体不道德行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jan;100(1):98-113. doi: 10.1037/a0036708. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
8
When feeling bad leads to feeling good: guilt-proneness and affective organizational commitment.当感到内疚反而带来良好感受时:内疚倾向与情感型组织承诺。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jan;97(1):124-33. doi: 10.1037/a0024166. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
9
Introducing the GASP scale: a new measure of guilt and shame proneness.引入 GASP 量表:一种新的内疚和羞耻倾向度量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 May;100(5):947-66. doi: 10.1037/a0022641.
10
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.用于评估和比较多重中介模型中间接效应的渐近和重抽样策略。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879.