• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线实施以康复为导向的支持和信息计划:EOLAS 计划。

Operationalising a Recovery-Oriented Support and Information Programme Online: The EOLAS Programme.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, D02 T283 Dublin, Ireland.

Trinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, D02 T283 Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 1;20(5):4417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054417.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20054417
PMID:36901424
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10002363/
Abstract

Evidence demonstrates that psychoeducation interventions have clinical and recovery-related benefits for people experiencing psychosis and their family members. The EOLAS programmes are one example of recovery-oriented psychoeducation programmes for psychosis. They differ from other programmes in that they are co-designed and co-facilitated (peer and clinician) group programmes. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, EOLAS went online using a videoconferencing platform. The study examined the feasibility, acceptability and usefulness of EOLAS-Online and explored whether some of the positive recovery outcomes reported by attendees regarding the in-person programmes were replicated online. Data were collected through an online survey and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. Fifteen attendees (40% of attendees) completed the surveys and eight participated in interviews. A total of 80% were satisfied/very satisfied with the programme. The programme was rated highly for increased knowledge of mental health, coping strategies, and engaging with peers. The use of technology was mostly unproblematic, although some audio and video-related challenges were identified. Engaging with the online programme was experienced positively, including facilitator support to engage. The overall findings indicate that EOLAS-Online is feasible, acceptable and useful in supporting attendees' recovery journeys.

摘要

证据表明,心理教育干预对经历精神病和其家庭成员有临床和康复相关的益处。EOLAS 计划是精神病康复导向心理教育计划的一个例子。它们与其他计划的不同之处在于,它们是由同伴和临床医生共同设计和共同主持的小组计划。由于 COVID-19 大流行,EOLAS 使用视频会议平台在线进行。该研究考察了 EOLAS-Online 的可行性、可接受性和有用性,并探讨了参与者在线上课程中报告的一些积极康复结果是否在网上得到复制。数据通过在线调查和半结构化访谈收集。使用描述性统计方法对定量数据进行分析。使用主题分析对定性数据进行分析。共有 15 名参与者(参与者的 40%)完成了调查,8 名参与者参加了访谈。总共 80%的人对该项目表示满意/非常满意。该项目在增加心理健康知识、应对策略和与同伴接触方面的评价很高。尽管发现了一些与音频和视频相关的挑战,但技术的使用大多没有问题。参与者对在线课程的参与体验是积极的,包括促进者的支持。总体研究结果表明,EOLAS-Online 支持参与者的康复之旅是可行的、可接受的和有用的。

相似文献

1
Operationalising a Recovery-Oriented Support and Information Programme Online: The EOLAS Programme.在线实施以康复为导向的支持和信息计划:EOLAS 计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 1;20(5):4417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054417.
2
A participatory approach to the development of a co-produced and co-delivered information programme for users of services and family members: the EOLAS programme (paper 1).一种为服务使用者和家庭成员共同制定和提供信息计划的参与式方法:EOLAS计划(论文1)。
Ir J Psychol Med. 2017 Mar;34(1):19-27. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2015.68.
3
Family members' perspectives on the acceptability and impact of a co-facilitated information programme: the EOLAS mental health programme.家庭成员对共同主持的信息方案(EOLAS 心理健康方案)的可接受性和影响的看法。
Ir J Psychol Med. 2022 Mar;39(1):64-73. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2019.37. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
4
Outcomes of a co-facilitation skills training programme for mental health service users, family members, and clinicians: the EOLAS project.精神卫生服务使用者、家属和临床医生共同促进技能培训方案的结果:EOLAS 项目。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(2):911-921. doi: 10.1111/inm.12388. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
5
A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT.一项基于网络的、由同行支持的自我管理干预措施,旨在减轻精神病或双相情感障碍患者亲属的痛苦:REACT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(32):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta24320.
6
Impact of co-facilitated information programmes on outcomes for service users and family members: the EOLAS programmes (paper 2).共同推动的信息项目对服务使用者和家庭成员结局的影响:EOLAS项目(论文2)
Ir J Psychol Med. 2017 Mar;34(1):29-37. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2015.69.
7
Evaluation of a co-facilitated information and learning programme for service users: the EOLAS programme.服务使用者共同参与的信息和学习项目评估:EOLAS 项目。
Ir J Psychol Med. 2020 Jun;37(2):89-98. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2019.32. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
8
A qualitative study exploring the acceptability of a telehealth intervention for family members of people experiencing a first episode psychosis: PERCEPTION.一项定性研究,探讨远程医疗干预对首次发作精神病患者家属的可接受性:认知。
Ir J Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 27:1-8. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2024.37.
9
Evaluating the online delivery of an autistic-led programme to support newly diagnosed or identified autistic adults.评估由自闭症患者主导的项目通过在线方式为新诊断或确诊的成年自闭症患者提供支持的情况。
Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2023 Jul 27;8:23969415231189608. doi: 10.1177/23969415231189608. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
Carer psychoeducation in first-episode psychosis: evaluation outcomes from a structured group programme.首发精神病患者的照料者心理教育:结构化团体方案的评估结果。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;59(4):391-7. doi: 10.1177/0020764012438476. Epub 2012 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Interventions in the Rehabilitation and the Management of Psychosis and Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review on Digitally-Delivered Interventions.精神病和精神分裂症康复与管理中的心理社会干预:关于数字交付干预的系统评价
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2025 Mar;53(2):379-421. doi: 10.62641/aep.v53i2.1851.
2
Nurses' Perceptions on How Recovery-Oriented Mental Health Care Can Be Developed and Implemented.护士对如何发展和实施以康复为导向的精神卫生保健的看法。
Nurs Res Pract. 2023 Aug 23;2023:4504420. doi: 10.1155/2023/4504420. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis.数字心理教育和同伴支持干预(COPe-support)的可接受性和体验:对支持精神病患者的照顾者的访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e27781. doi: 10.2196/27781.
2
The digital divide: factors impacting on uptake of remote therapy in a South London psychological therapy service for people with psychosis.数字鸿沟:影响伦敦南部为精神病患者提供的心理治疗服务中远程治疗采用率的因素。
J Ment Health. 2022 Dec;31(6):825-832. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1952955. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
3
Combining online and offline peer support groups in community mental health care settings: a qualitative study of service users' experiences.
在社区精神卫生保健环境中结合线上和线下同伴支持小组:一项关于服务使用者体验的定性研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 May 29;14:39. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00370-x. eCollection 2020.
4
A systematic review of online interventions for families of patients with severe mental disorders.一项关于在线干预严重精神障碍患者家庭的系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 15;263:147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.106. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
5
Perspectives on Mobile Health Versus Clinic-Based Group Interventions for People With Serious Mental Illnesses: A Qualitative Study.移动医疗与基于诊所的团体干预对严重精神疾病患者的效果比较:定性研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Jan 1;71(1):49-56. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900110. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
6
Family members' perspectives on the acceptability and impact of a co-facilitated information programme: the EOLAS mental health programme.家庭成员对共同主持的信息方案(EOLAS 心理健康方案)的可接受性和影响的看法。
Ir J Psychol Med. 2022 Mar;39(1):64-73. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2019.37. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
7
Usability evaluation of an eHealth intervention for family carers of individuals affected by psychosis: A mixed-method study.针对受精神病影响个体的家庭照料者的电子健康干预措施的可用性评估:一项混合方法研究。
Digit Health. 2019 Aug 28;5:2055207619871148. doi: 10.1177/2055207619871148. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
8
Evaluation of a co-facilitated information and learning programme for service users: the EOLAS programme.服务使用者共同参与的信息和学习项目评估:EOLAS 项目。
Ir J Psychol Med. 2020 Jun;37(2):89-98. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2019.32. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
9
Eliciting recovery narratives in global mental health: Benefits and potential harms in service user participation.在全球心理健康中引出康复叙事:服务使用者参与的益处和潜在危害。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020 Jun;43(2):111-120. doi: 10.1037/prj0000384. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
10
A qualitative exploration of service user views about using digital health interventions for self-management in severe mental health problems.服务用户对使用数字健康干预措施进行严重精神健康问题自我管理的看法的定性探索。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 21;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1979-1.