• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对受精神病影响个体的家庭照料者的电子健康干预措施的可用性评估:一项混合方法研究。

Usability evaluation of an eHealth intervention for family carers of individuals affected by psychosis: A mixed-method study.

作者信息

Sin Jacqueline, Woodham Luke A, Henderson Claire, Williams Elen, Sesé Hernández Aurora, Gillard Steve

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, UK.

School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, UK.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2019 Aug 28;5:2055207619871148. doi: 10.1177/2055207619871148. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2055207619871148
PMID:31489205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6713967/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Existing research suggests that eHealth interventions targeting family carers of individuals with long-term illness offer a promising approach to care delivery. In particular, digital psychoeducational interventions with interactive psychosocial support are well-received with high rates of satisfaction and acceptability. However, development of such interventions for psychosis carers is lacking. We developed a multi-component eHealth intervention specifically for carers of individuals affected by psychosis, called COPe-support (Carers fOr People with Psychosis e-support).

OBJECTIVE

Using mixed methods to evaluate usability, system heuristics and perceived acceptability, we conducted a usability study to establish the suitability of the intervention prototype for the target user group.

METHODS

Twenty-three carers were recruited to the study and participated in a think-aloud test or a remote online trial of the intervention. Qualitative feedback, post-use System Usability Scale (SUS) scores, and real-world usage data collected from the tests were analysed. These were also supplemented with heuristic evaluation data provided by an independent eLearning technology expert.

RESULTS

Participants evaluated the intervention content as useful and helpful, and indicated that the system had satisfactory usability with a mean SUS score of 73%, above the usability quality benchmark threshold. Study results identified some minor usability issues, which were corroborated with the eLearning expert's heuristic evaluation findings. We used these results to refine the COPe-support intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The usability study with end-users and service providers identified real-life usage and usability issues. The study results helped us refine COPe-support and its delivery strategy before its launch as part of a large-scale clinical trial.

摘要

背景

现有研究表明,针对慢性病患者家庭护理者的电子健康干预措施为护理服务提供了一种很有前景的方法。特别是,具有交互式心理社会支持的数字心理教育干预措施受到广泛欢迎,满意度和可接受率很高。然而,针对精神病患者护理者的此类干预措施尚不完善。我们专门为受精神病影响者的护理者开发了一种多组件电子健康干预措施,称为COPe-support(精神病患者护理者电子支持)。

目的

我们采用混合方法评估可用性、系统启发式方法和感知可接受性,进行了一项可用性研究,以确定干预原型对目标用户群体的适用性。

方法

招募了23名护理者参与研究,并参加了该干预措施的出声思考测试或远程在线试验。对定性反馈、使用后系统可用性量表(SUS)得分以及从测试中收集的实际使用数据进行了分析。这些数据还得到了一位独立的电子学习技术专家提供的启发式评估数据的补充。

结果

参与者认为干预内容有用且有帮助,并表示该系统具有令人满意的可用性,平均SUS得分为73%,高于可用性质量基准阈值。研究结果发现了一些小的可用性问题,这些问题得到了电子学习专家启发式评估结果的证实。我们利用这些结果对COPe-support干预措施进行了完善。

结论

与最终用户和服务提供者进行的可用性研究确定了实际使用情况和可用性问题。研究结果帮助我们在将COPe-support作为大规模临床试验的一部分推出之前,对其进行了完善,并优化了其交付策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4101/6713967/0d45c85c6c9b/10.1177_2055207619871148-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4101/6713967/fe771ba0fd83/10.1177_2055207619871148-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4101/6713967/a37ec399db70/10.1177_2055207619871148-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4101/6713967/0d45c85c6c9b/10.1177_2055207619871148-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4101/6713967/fe771ba0fd83/10.1177_2055207619871148-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4101/6713967/a37ec399db70/10.1177_2055207619871148-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4101/6713967/0d45c85c6c9b/10.1177_2055207619871148-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Usability evaluation of an eHealth intervention for family carers of individuals affected by psychosis: A mixed-method study.针对受精神病影响个体的家庭照料者的电子健康干预措施的可用性评估:一项混合方法研究。
Digit Health. 2019 Aug 28;5:2055207619871148. doi: 10.1177/2055207619871148. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
2
A Multicomponent eHealth Intervention for Family Carers for People Affected by Psychosis: A Coproduced Design and Build Study.一项针对精神病患者家庭照顾者的多成分电子健康干预措施:一项联合设计与构建研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 6;21(8):e14374. doi: 10.2196/14374.
3
Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis.数字心理教育和同伴支持干预(COPe-support)的可接受性和体验:对支持精神病患者的照顾者的访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e27781. doi: 10.2196/27781.
4
COPe-support - a multi-component digital intervention for family carers for people affected by psychosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.COPe-支持 - 一种针对受精神病影响人群的家庭照顾者的多组件数字干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02528-w.
5
Usability and User Experience Testing of a Co-Designed Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes App ("MyPal for Adults") for Palliative Cancer Care: Mixed Methods Study.一项针对姑息性癌症护理的联合设计电子患者报告结局应用程序(“成人版MyPal”)的可用性和用户体验测试:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 24;12:e57342. doi: 10.2196/57342.
6
Usability and Usefulness of a Symptom Management Coaching System for Patients With Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的癌症患者症状管理指导系统的可用性和实用性:比较混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 23;9:e57659. doi: 10.2196/57659.
7
User feedback and usability testing of an online training and support program for dementia carers.针对痴呆症护理人员的在线培训与支持项目的用户反馈及可用性测试。
Internet Interv. 2021 Jun 8;25:100412. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100412. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Assessing usability of eHealth technology: A comparison of usability benchmarking instruments.评估电子健康技术的可用性:可用性基准测试工具比较。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Aug;128:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 5.
9
Development and Usability Testing of a Web-Based and Therapist-Assisted Coping Skills Program for Managing Psychosocial Problems in Individuals With Hand and Upper Limb Injuries: Mixed Methods Study.基于网络且由治疗师辅助的应对技能项目在手部及上肢损伤个体心理社会问题管理中的开发与可用性测试:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 May 6;7(2):e17088. doi: 10.2196/17088.
10
Usability testing of Avoiding Diabetes Thru Action Plan Targeting (ADAPT) decision support for integrating care-based counseling of pre-diabetes in an electronic health record.通过行动计划目标预防糖尿病(ADAPT)决策支持系统在电子健康记录中整合基于护理的糖尿病前期咨询的可用性测试。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Sep;83(9):636-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Interventions in the Rehabilitation and the Management of Psychosis and Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review on Digitally-Delivered Interventions.精神病和精神分裂症康复与管理中的心理社会干预:关于数字交付干预的系统评价
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2025 Mar;53(2):379-421. doi: 10.62641/aep.v53i2.1851.
2
Afraid of the dentist? There's an app for that: Development and usability testing of a cognitive behavior therapy-based mobile app.害怕看牙医?有一款应用程序可以解决这个问题:一款基于认知行为疗法的移动应用程序的开发与可用性测试。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Dec 11;3(12):e0000690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000690. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Multicomponent eHealth Intervention for Family Carers for People Affected by Psychosis: A Coproduced Design and Build Study.一项针对精神病患者家庭照顾者的多成分电子健康干预措施:一项联合设计与构建研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 6;21(8):e14374. doi: 10.2196/14374.
2
A mixed-methods evaluation framework for electronic health records usability studies.电子健康记录可用性研究的混合方法评估框架。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jun;94:103175. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103175. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
eHealth interventions for family carers of people with long term illness: A promising approach?
Designing and Evaluating IT Applications for Informal Caregivers: Scoping Review.
为非专业照护者设计和评估信息技术应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 23;26:e57393. doi: 10.2196/57393.
4
The Healthy Hearts Project: Development and evaluation of a website for cardiovascular risk assessment and visualisation and self-management through healthy lifestyle goal-setting.健康心脏项目:通过设定健康生活方式目标进行心血管风险评估、可视化及自我管理的网站的开发与评估。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Nov 29;2(11):e0000395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000395. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Continuous User Experience Monitoring of a Patient-Completed Preoperative Assessment System in the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional Study.英国患者完成的术前评估系统的持续用户体验监测:横断面研究
JMIRx Med. 2022 Jan 6;3(1):e31679. doi: 10.2196/31679.
6
Operationalising a Recovery-Oriented Support and Information Programme Online: The EOLAS Programme.在线实施以康复为导向的支持和信息计划:EOLAS 计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 1;20(5):4417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054417.
7
A bibliometric analysis on global eHealth.全球电子健康的文献计量分析
Digit Health. 2022 Apr 11;8:20552076221091352. doi: 10.1177/20552076221091352. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
8
Effect of digital psychoeducation and peer support on the mental health of family carers supporting individuals with psychosis in England (COPe-support): a randomised clinical trial.英格兰数字心理教育和同伴支持对支持精神病患者的家庭照顾者心理健康的影响(COPe-support):一项随机临床试验。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 May;4(5):e320-e329. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00031-0. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
9
A Mobile Health Salt Reduction Intervention for People With Hypertension: Results of a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对高血压患者的移动健康减盐干预措施的可行性随机对照试验结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 21;9(10):e26233. doi: 10.2196/26233.
10
Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI-assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice.确保患者和公众参与向人工智能辅助心理健康护理的过渡:系统范围界定综述和设计正义议程。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1072-1124. doi: 10.1111/hex.13299. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
电子健康干预措施在长期病患照顾者中的应用:一种有前景的方法?
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;60:109-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
4
Effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions for family carers of people with psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心理教育干预对精神疾病患者家属的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Aug;56:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 29.
5
Web-Based Psychoeducation Program for Caregivers of First-Episode of Psychosis: An Experience of Chinese Population in Hong Kong.基于网络的首次发作精神病患者照顾者心理教育项目:香港华人的经验。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 26;7:2006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02006. eCollection 2016.
6
Wellbeing, mental health knowledge and caregiving experiences of siblings of people with psychosis, compared to their peers and parents: an exploratory study.与同龄人及父母相比,精神病患者兄弟姐妹的幸福感、心理健康知识及照料经历:一项探索性研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;51(9):1247-55. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1222-7. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Usability Evaluation of a Mobile Monitoring System to Assess Symptoms After a Traumatic Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study.移动监测系统评估创伤后症状的可用性:一项混合方法研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Jan 11;3(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/mental.5023.
8
A Clinical Trial to Test the Feasibility of a Telehealth Psychoeducational Intervention for Persons With Schizophrenia and Their Families: Intervention and 3-Month Findings.一项测试远程医疗心理教育干预对精神分裂症患者及其家属可行性的临床试验:干预措施及3个月的研究结果。
Rehabil Psychol. 2005 Nov;50(4):325-336. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.50.4.325.
9
eHealth integration and interoperability issues: towards a solution through enterprise architecture.电子健康集成和互操作性问题:通过企业架构寻找解决方案。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2015 May 13;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s13755-015-0009-7. eCollection 2015.
10
Interventions to improve the experience of caring for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis.改善严重精神疾病患者护理体验的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;206(4):268-74. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.147561.