Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaakob Latif, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Respiratory Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaakob Latif, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054443.
Tobacco and nicotine derivatives uses are multiple in nature. These include conventional cigarettes (CCs), heated tobacco products (HTPs), and electronic cigarettes (ECs). This study aims to determine the practices, nicotine dependency profile, association with exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) level, and pulmonary function (PF) among adult product users and non-smokers. This cross-sectional study involved smokers, nicotine users, and non-smokers from two public health facilities in Kuala Lumpur from December 2021 to April 2022. Data on socio-demography, smoking profile, nicotine dependency level, anthropometry, eCO monitor, and spirometer measurements were recorded. Out of 657 respondents, 52.1% were non-smokers, 48.3% were CC only smokers, poly-users (PUs) (27.3%), EC-only users (20.9%), and HTP-only users (3.5%). EC use was prevalent among the younger aged, tertiary educated, and females; HTP use was prevalent among those of an older age and CC users was common among lower educated males. The highest median eCO (in ppm) seen were as follows: in CC users only (13.00), PUs (7.00), EC users (2.00), HTP users (2.00), and the least was observed among non-smokers (1.00), which is significantly different across the groups ( <0.001). Comparison of practice between the different product users showed significant differences in age of product initiation ( <0.001, youngest in CC users in PUs), duration of product use ( <0.001, longest in exclusive CC users), cost per month ( <0.001, highest in exclusive HTP users) and attempt to quit product ( <0.001, CC use in PUs had the highest attempt to quit), while there is no significant difference in Fagerström score across the groups. Among EC users, 68.2% successfully switched from smoking CCs to ECs. The findings suggest that EC and HTP users are exhaling less CO. The use of these products in a targeted approach may manage nicotine addiction. Switching practice was higher among current EC users (from using CCs), hence emphasizing the need of switching encouragement and total nicotine abstinence later on. Lower eCO levels in the PU group, (as compared to CC-only users) and high quit attempt rate among in CC use in PUs may indicate attempt of PUs in reducing CC use through alternative modalities such as ECs and HTPs.
烟草和尼古丁衍生物的用途多种多样。这些包括传统香烟(CC)、加热烟草产品(HTP)和电子烟(EC)。本研究旨在确定成年产品使用者和非吸烟者的使用情况、尼古丁依赖程度、与呼出一氧化碳(eCO)水平的关联以及肺功能(PF)。这项横断面研究涉及 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 4 月吉隆坡两家公共卫生机构的吸烟者、尼古丁使用者和非吸烟者。记录了社会人口统计学、吸烟状况、尼古丁依赖程度、人体测量学、eCO 监测仪和肺活量计测量数据。在 657 名受访者中,52.1%是非吸烟者,48.3%是仅吸 CC 的吸烟者,多用户(PU)(27.3%)、仅吸 EC 的用户(20.9%)和仅吸 HTP 的用户(3.5%)。EC 的使用者主要是年龄较小、接受过高等教育的女性;HTP 的使用者主要是年龄较大的人,而 CC 的使用者主要是教育程度较低的男性。观察到的最高中位 eCO(ppm)如下:仅吸 CC 的使用者(13.00)、PU(7.00)、EC 使用者(2.00)、HTP 使用者(2.00),而非吸烟者的最低(1.00),这在各组之间有显著差异(<0.001)。不同产品使用者之间的使用实践比较显示,产品使用起始年龄(<0.001,PU 中最小的是 CC 用户)、产品使用持续时间(<0.001,仅吸 CC 的使用者最长)、每月费用(<0.001,仅吸 HTP 的使用者最高)和戒烟尝试(<0.001,PU 中 CC 的使用尝试最高)存在显著差异,而各组之间的 Fagerström 评分没有显著差异。在 EC 的使用者中,68.2%成功从吸 CC 转为吸 EC。研究结果表明,EC 和 HTP 的使用者呼出的 CO 较少。有针对性地使用这些产品可能有助于控制尼古丁成瘾。目前 EC 的使用者(从使用 CC 转为使用 EC)的转换率较高,因此强调需要鼓励转换,以后完全戒除尼古丁。与仅吸 CC 的使用者相比,PU 组的 eCO 水平较低(<0.001),以及在 PU 中 CC 使用率较高的戒烟尝试率(<0.001),可能表明 PU 试图通过 EC 和 HTP 等替代方式减少 CC 的使用。