• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“他们把我当物体对待”:一项关于被诊断为精神障碍的人参与其医疗保健的定性研究。

"It's That They Treated Me Like an Object": A Qualitative Study on the Participation of People Diagnosed with Psychotic Disorders in Their Health Care.

机构信息

Mental Health Unit, Regional University Hospital, 29009 Málaga, Spain.

Faculty of Heath Sciences, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 5;20(5):4614. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054614.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20054614
PMID:36901624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10002244/
Abstract

The mental health recovery model is based on shared decision making, in which patients' preferences and perceptions of the care received are taken into account. However, persons with psychosis usually have very few opportunities to participate in this process. The present study explores the experiences and perceptions of a group of patients with psychosis-in some cases longstanding, in others more recently diagnosed-concerning their participation in the decisions taken about the approach to their condition and about the attention received from healthcare professionals and services. For this purpose, we performed a qualitative analysis of the outcomes derived from five focus groups and six in-depth interviews (36 participants). Two major themes, with five sub-themes, were identified: shared decision-making (drug-centred approach, negotiation process, and lack of information) and the care environment and styles of clinical practice as determinants (aggressive versus person-centred environments, and styles of professional practice). The main conclusions drawn are that users want to participate more in decision making, they want to be offered a range of psychosocial options from the outset and that their treatment should be based on accessibility, humanity and respect. These findings are in line with the guidelines for clinical practice and should be taken into account in the design of care programmes and the organisation of services for persons with psychosis.

摘要

心理健康康复模式基于共同决策,其中考虑到患者对所接受护理的偏好和看法。然而,精神病患者通常几乎没有机会参与这一过程。本研究探讨了一组精神病患者的经验和看法,他们的患病经历有的较为长久,有的则较为新近确诊,涉及他们对自身病情处理方式的决策以及对医疗保健专业人员和服务的关注的参与程度。为此,我们对五个焦点小组和六个深度访谈(36 名参与者)的结果进行了定性分析。确定了两个主要主题,包括五个子主题:共同决策(以药物为中心的方法、协商过程和缺乏信息)和护理环境及临床实践风格作为决定因素(积极与以患者为中心的环境以及专业实践风格)。得出的主要结论是,用户希望更多地参与决策,他们希望从一开始就提供一系列心理社会选择,并且他们的治疗应该基于可及性、人性化和尊重。这些发现与临床实践指南一致,应在为精神病患者设计护理方案和组织服务时加以考虑。

相似文献

1
"It's That They Treated Me Like an Object": A Qualitative Study on the Participation of People Diagnosed with Psychotic Disorders in Their Health Care.“他们把我当物体对待”:一项关于被诊断为精神障碍的人参与其医疗保健的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 5;20(5):4614. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054614.
2
Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study.挪威精神病患者共同决策体验的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03849-8.
3
Mental health professionals' experiences with shared decision-making for patients with psychotic disorders: a qualitative study.心理健康专业人员针对精神障碍患者进行共同决策的经验:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 27;20(1):1093. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05949-1.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Patients' experiences of shared decision-making in nursing care: A qualitative study.患者在护理中参与决策的体验:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Jun;33(6):2274-2286. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17032. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
6
Barriers to shared decision making in mental health care: qualitative study of the Joint Crisis Plan for psychosis.精神卫生保健中共同决策的障碍:对精神病联合危机计划的定性研究
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):448-58. doi: 10.1111/hex.12368. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
7
"I'd Like to Have More of a Say Because It's My Body": Adolescents' Perceptions Around Barriers and Facilitators to Shared Decision-Making.“我希望能有更多的话语权,因为这是我的身体”:青少年对共同决策障碍和促进因素的看法。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Nov;65(5):633-642. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
8
Involvement of people with schizophrenia in decision-making in rural Ethiopia: a qualitative study.精神分裂症患者参与农村埃塞俄比亚决策制定的情况:一项定性研究。
Global Health. 2018 Aug 22;14(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0403-4.
9
Users remain overlooked: Shared decision-making processes for people with anxiety disorders.患者仍然被忽视:焦虑症患者的共同决策过程。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;32(1):203-214. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13095. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
10
Being in a space of sharing decision-making for dignified mental care.处于共享决策的空间,以实现有尊严的精神关怀。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):368-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12548. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Power Imbalances and Stigma in Mental Healthcare. Patient-Reported Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Care, a Qualitative Meta-Summary.应对精神卫生保健中的权力失衡和污名化。患者报告的参与精神卫生保健共同决策的障碍和促进因素,一项定性元综述。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70239. doi: 10.1111/hex.70239.
2
Management of Psychosis and Schizophrenia by Primary Care GPs: A Cross-Sectional Study in Spain.西班牙基层医疗全科医生对精神病和精神分裂症的管理:一项横断面研究
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319241306177. doi: 10.1177/21501319241306177.
3
In Pursuit of Recovery: A Comparative Study of Stakeholder Perspectives on Outcomes of People with Psychosis.追求康复:关于精神病患者结局的利益相关者观点的比较研究
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Feb;61(2):300-313. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01399-9. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental Health Service Users' Perspectives on Psychiatric Advance Directives: A Systematic Review.精神卫生服务使用者对精神科预嘱的看法:系统评价。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Apr 1;74(4):381-392. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202200003. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
2
Increasing person-centeredness in psychosis inpatient care: staff experiences from the Person-Centered Psychosis Care (PCPC) project.提高精神病住院治疗中的以患者为中心程度:来自以患者为中心的精神病护理(PCPC)项目的工作人员经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 3;22(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08008-z.
3
Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study.挪威精神病患者共同决策体验的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03849-8.
4
Social and occupational recovery in early psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions.早期精神病患者的社会和职业康复:心理社会干预的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Apr;53(5):1787-1798. doi: 10.1017/S003329172100341X. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
5
'I do not know where it comes from, I am suspicious of some childhood trauma' association of trauma with psychosis according to the experience of those affected.我不知道它从何而来,我怀疑与一些童年创伤有关,根据受影响者的经验,创伤与精神病有关。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jul 22;12(1):1940759. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1940759. eCollection 2021.
6
The alliance-outcome relationship in individual psychosocial treatment for schizophrenia and early psychosis: A meta-analysis.精神分裂症和早期精神病个体心理社会治疗的联盟-结局关系:荟萃分析。
Schizophr Res. 2021 May;231:154-163. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Treatment decision-making needs among emerging adults with early psychosis.早期精神病患者成年早期的治疗决策需求。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;16(1):78-90. doi: 10.1111/eip.13134. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
8
Shared decision making for psychiatric medication management: a summary of its uptake, barriers and facilitators.精神药物管理中的共享决策:其采用、障碍和促进因素概述。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Jun;43(3):759-763. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01240-3. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
9
"I think that everybody should be involved": What informs experiences of shared decision-making in supporting people living with schizophrenia spectrum disorders?“我认为每个人都应该参与进来”:在支持患有精神分裂谱系障碍的人时,是什么影响了共同决策的体验?
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1583-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
10
Discrepancy in Ratings of Shared Decision Making Between Patients and Health Professionals: A Cross Sectional Study in Mental Health Care.患者与医疗专业人员在共同决策评分上的差异:一项精神卫生保健领域的横断面研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 24;11:443. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00443. eCollection 2020.