• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Treatment decision-making needs among emerging adults with early psychosis.早期精神病患者成年早期的治疗决策需求。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;16(1):78-90. doi: 10.1111/eip.13134. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
2
The Early Youth Engagement in first episode psychosis (EYE-2) study: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of implementation, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a team-based motivational engagement intervention to improve engagement.早期青年参与首发精神病(EYE-2)研究:基于团队的动机参与干预措施以提高参与度的实施、有效性和成本效益的实用整群随机对照试验
Trials. 2021 Apr 12;22(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05105-y.
3
Early intervention in psychosis for first episode psychotic mania: the experience of people diagnosed with bipolar disorder.首发精神病性躁狂的精神病早期干预:双相情感障碍患者的体验。
J Ment Health. 2024 Aug;33(4):500-506. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2024.2332805. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
4
Engagement in specialized early intervention services for psychosis as an interplay between personal agency and critical structures: A qualitative study.参与精神病的专业化早期干预服务:个人能动性与关键结构的相互作用:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Aug;108:103583. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103583. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
5
A qualitative study exploring how Practitioners within Early Intervention in Psychosis Services engage with Service Users' experiences of voice hearing?一项探索早期精神病干预服务从业者如何与服务使用者的幻听体验相接触的定性研究?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;27(5):607-615. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12612. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
6
Client Views of Engagement in the RAISE Connection Program for Early Psychosis Recovery.早期精神病康复RAISE连接项目中服务对象对参与的看法
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jul;66(7):699-704. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400475. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
[What support of young presenting a first psychotic episode, when schooling is being challenged?].当学业受到挑战时,对于首次出现精神病发作的年轻人有哪些支持措施?
Encephale. 2017 Dec;43(6):570-576. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
8
Applying the cultural adaption framework to the Early Youth Engagement (EYE-2) approach to early intervention in psychosis.运用文化调适框架于早期精神病干预中的青少年早期参与(EYE-2)方法。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2023 Sep;62(3):537-555. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12423. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
9
Service-users' experiences of an early intervention in psychosis service: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.服务使用者对早期精神病干预服务的体验:一种阐释现象学分析。
Psychol Psychother. 2012 Dec;85(4):456-69. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.2011.02043.x. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
10
Evaluating the feasibility of a decision aid to promote shared decision making among young adults with first-episode psychosis: protocol for a pilot study.评估决策辅助工具在首发精神病青年成人中促进共同决策的可行性:一项试点研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jan 11;7(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00757-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Case Study Analysis of a Decision Coaching Intervention for Young Adults with Early Psychosis.针对早期精神病青年成人的决策辅导干预案例研究分析
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jan 3. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01425-w.
2
Developing a spectrum model of engagement in services for first episode psychosis: beyond attendance.构建首发精神病服务参与度的频谱模型:超越出勤率
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 3;15:1429135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1429135. eCollection 2024.
3
Short-term disengagement from early intervention service for first-episode psychosis: findings from the "Parma Early Psychosis" program.首发精神病的早期干预服务短期脱离:来自“帕尔马早期精神病”项目的发现。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;59(7):1201-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02564-3. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
"It's That They Treated Me Like an Object": A Qualitative Study on the Participation of People Diagnosed with Psychotic Disorders in Their Health Care.“他们把我当物体对待”:一项关于被诊断为精神障碍的人参与其医疗保健的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 5;20(5):4614. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054614.
5
Facilitating treatment engagement for early psychosis through peer-delivered decision support: intervention development and protocol for pilot evaluation.通过同伴提供的决策支持促进早期精神病患者的治疗参与:干预措施开发及试点评估方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Oct 24;7(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00927-8.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Shared Decision-Making Interventions for Service Users With Serious Mental Illnesses: State of the Science and Future Directions.一项针对有严重精神疾病的服务使用者的共享决策干预措施的系统评价:科学现状和未来方向。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Nov 1;72(11):1288-1300. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000429. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
2
Disengagement From Early Intervention Services for Psychosis: A Systematic Review.从精神病早期干预服务中退出:系统评价。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jan 1;72(1):49-60. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900375. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
3
Predictors of Early Discharge From Early Intervention Services for Psychosis in New York State.纽约州精神病早期干预服务早期出院的预测因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Nov 1;71(11):1151-1157. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000025. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
4
Determinants of Therapeutic Alliance With People With Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Literature Review.治疗精神病患者的治疗联盟的决定因素:系统文献综述。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2020 Apr;208(4):329-339. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001125.
5
The Journey to Use Medication Optimally to Support Recovery.优化用药以支持康复的历程。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Apr 1;71(4):401-402. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900506. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
The association between community and service level factors and rates of disengagement in individuals with first episode psychosis.社区和服务水平因素与首发精神病患者脱离率的关系。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Aug;210:122-127. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.05.037. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
7
Paranoia and interpersonal functioning across the continuum from healthy to pathological - Network analysis.从健康到病理连续体的偏执狂和人际功能 - 网络分析。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Mar;58(1):19-34. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12199. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
8
Psychopharmacological Treatment in the RAISE-ETP Study: Outcomes of a Manual and Computer Decision Support System Based Intervention.在 RAISE-ETP 研究中的精神药理学治疗:基于手册和计算机决策支持系统的干预的结果。
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;175(2):169-179. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16080919. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
9
Perceived Autonomy Support in the NIMH RAISE Early Treatment Program.在 NIMH RAISE 早期治疗计划中感知到的自主性支持。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Sep 1;68(9):916-922. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600480. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
The Choice Project: Peer Workers Promoting Shared Decision Making at a Youth Mental Health Service.选择项目:同伴工作者在青少年心理健康服务中促进共同决策
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Aug 1;68(8):764-770. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600388. Epub 2017 May 1.

早期精神病患者成年早期的治疗决策需求。

Treatment decision-making needs among emerging adults with early psychosis.

机构信息

College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Early Interv Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;16(1):78-90. doi: 10.1111/eip.13134. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1111/eip.13134
PMID:33599089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9116145/
Abstract

AIM

Many emerging adults disengage from early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services prematurely. Service disengagement may be in part due to having unresolved treatment decision-making needs about use of mental health services. A basic understanding of the decision-making needs of this population is lacking. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify the range of treatment decisions that emerging adults face during their initial engagement in an EIP program and elucidate barriers and facilitators to decision-making.

METHODS

Twenty emerging adults with early psychosis were administered semistructured interviews to capture treatment decision-making experiences during the first six months after enrolment in an EIP program. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Responses were independently coded by two authors using an integrated thematic analysis approach; differences in coding were discussed to consensus. Data analysis was facilitated using NVivo 12 Plus.

RESULTS

Emerging adults identified numerous decisions faced after EIP enrolment. Decisions pertaining to life and treatment goals and to starting and continuing psychiatric medication were commonly selected as the most difficult/complicated. Decision-making barriers included not having the right amount or type of information/knowledge, social factors (e.g., lacking social support, opposition/pressure), lacking internal resources (e.g., cognitive and communication skills, self-efficacy, motivation) and unappealing options. Obtaining information/knowledge, social supports (e.g., connection/trust, learning from others' experiences, encouragement), considering personal values, and time were decision-making facilitators.

CONCLUSIONS

This study informs development and optimization of interventions to support decision-making among emerging adults with early psychosis, which may promote service engagement.

摘要

目的

许多成年早期患者过早地退出早期精神病干预(EIP)服务。服务脱节可能部分是由于在使用心理健康服务方面未解决的治疗决策需求。对该人群的决策需求的基本了解不足。本定性研究的目的是确定成年早期患者在最初参与 EIP 计划期间面临的一系列治疗决策,并阐明决策的障碍和促进因素。

方法

对 20 名早期精神病患者进行半结构化访谈,以了解他们在参加 EIP 计划后的头六个月内的治疗决策经验。采访进行了录音并逐字记录。两名作者使用综合主题分析方法独立对答复进行编码;对编码差异进行了讨论,以达成共识。使用 NVivo 12 Plus 促进数据分析。

结果

成年早期患者确定了在 EIP 注册后面临的许多决策。与生活和治疗目标以及开始和继续使用精神药物有关的决策通常被认为是最困难/复杂的。决策障碍包括缺乏适当数量或类型的信息/知识、社会因素(例如缺乏社会支持、反对/压力)、缺乏内部资源(例如认知和沟通技巧、自我效能、动机)和不吸引人的选择。获取信息/知识、社会支持(例如,联系/信任、从他人的经验中学习、鼓励)、考虑个人价值观和时间是决策的促进因素。

结论

这项研究为支持早期精神病成年早期患者的决策提供了干预措施的开发和优化,这可能会促进服务的参与。