• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外使用最小化操作的原代人骨髓基质干细胞扩增三维打印聚己内酯组织支架的成骨再生潜力。

Osteoregenerative Potential of 3D-Printed Poly -Caprolactone Tissue Scaffolds In Vitro Using Minimally Manipulative Expansion of Primary Human Bone Marrow Stem Cells.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Cabell Huntington Hospital Laboratory, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25701, USA.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25703, USA.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 3;24(5):4940. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054940.

DOI:10.3390/ijms24054940
PMID:36902373
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10003608/
Abstract

The repair of orthopedic and maxillofacial defects in modern medicine currently relies heavily on the use of autograft, allograft, void fillers, or other structural material composites. This study examines the in vitro osteo regenerative potential of polycaprolactone (PCL) tissue scaffolding, fabricated via a three-dimensional (3D) additive manufacturing technology, i.e., a pneumatic micro extrusion (PME) process. The objectives of this study were: (i) To examine the innate osteoinductive and osteoconductive potential of 3D-printed PCL tissue scaffolding and (ii) To perform a direct in vitro comparison of 3D-printed PCL scaffolding with allograft Allowash cancellous bone cubes with regards to cell-scaffold interactions and biocompatibility with three primary human bone marrow (hBM) stem cell lines. This study specifically examined cell survival, cell integration, intra-scaffold cell proliferation, and differentiation of progenitor cells to investigate the potential of 3D-printed PCL scaffolds as an alternative to allograft bone material for the repair of orthopedic injuries. We found that mechanically robust PCL bone scaffolds can be fabricated via the PME process and the resulting material did not elicit detectable cytotoxicity. When the widely used osteogenic model SAOS-2 was cultured in PCL extract medium, no detectable effect was observed on cell viability or proliferation with multiple test groups showing viability ranges of 92.2% to 100% relative to a control group with a standard deviation of ±10%. In addition, we found that the honeycomb infill pattern of the 3D-printed PCL scaffold allowed for superior mesenchymal stem-cell integration, proliferation, and biomass increase. When healthy and active primary hBM cell lines, having documented in vitro growth rates with doubling times of 23.9, 24.67, and 30.94 h, were cultured directly into 3D-printed PCL scaffolds, impressive biomass increase values were observed. It was found that the PCL scaffolding material allowed for biomass increase values of 17.17%, 17.14%, and 18.18%, compared to values of 4.29% for allograph material cultured under identical parameters. It was also found that the honeycomb scaffold infill pattern was superior to the cubic and rectangular matrix structures, and provided a superior microenvironment for osteogenic and hematopoietic progenitor cell activity and auto-differentiation of primary hBM stem cells. Histological and immunohistochemical studies performed in this work confirmed the regenerative potential of PCL matrices in the orthopedic setting by displaying the integration, self-organization, and auto-differentiation of hBM progenitor cells within the matrix. Differentiation products including mineralization, self-organizing "proto-osteon" structures, and in vitro erythropoiesis were observed in conjunction with the documented expression of expected bone marrow differentiative markers including CD-99 (>70%), CD-71 (>60%), and CD-61 (>5%). All of the studies were conducted without the addition of any exogenous chemical or hormonal stimulation and exclusively utilized the abiotic and inert material polycaprolactone; setting this work apart from the vast majority of contemporary investigations into synthetic bone scaffold fabrication In summary, this study demonstrates the unique clinical potential of 3D-printed PCL scaffolds for stem cell expansion and incorporation into advanced microstructures created via PME manufacturing to generate a physiologically inert temporary bony defect graft with significant autograft features for enhanced end-stage healing.

摘要

在现代医学中,骨科和颌面缺陷的修复目前主要依赖于使用自体移植物、同种异体移植物、空隙填充物或其他结构材料复合材料。本研究考察了通过三维(3D)添加剂制造技术(即气动微挤压(PME)工艺)制造的聚己内酯(PCL)组织支架的体外成骨再生潜力。本研究的目的是:(i)检查 3D 打印 PCL 组织支架的固有成骨诱导和骨传导潜力,(ii)直接比较 3D 打印 PCL 支架与同种异体移植物 Allowash 松质骨块在细胞-支架相互作用和与三种原代人骨髓(hBM)干细胞系的生物相容性方面。本研究特别研究了细胞存活、细胞整合、支架内细胞增殖和祖细胞分化,以研究 3D 打印 PCL 支架作为替代同种异体骨材料修复骨科损伤的潜力。我们发现,通过 PME 工艺可以制造出机械强度高的 PCL 骨支架,并且所得到的材料没有引起可检测的细胞毒性。当广泛使用的成骨模型 SAOS-2 在 PCL 提取物培养基中培养时,在多个测试组中观察到细胞活力或增殖没有可检测到的影响,与对照组相比,细胞活力范围为 92.2%至 100%,标准偏差为±10%。此外,我们发现 3D 打印 PCL 支架的蜂窝状填充图案允许间充质干细胞更好地整合、增殖和生物量增加。当健康活跃的原代 hBM 细胞系(其体外生长速率具有倍增时间 23.9、24.67 和 30.94 h)直接培养在 3D 打印 PCL 支架中时,观察到令人印象深刻的生物量增加值。结果发现,与在相同参数下培养的同种异体移植物材料的 4.29%相比,PCL 支架材料允许生物量增加 17.17%、17.14%和 18.18%。还发现蜂窝状支架填充图案优于立方和矩形基质结构,为成骨和造血祖细胞活性以及原代 hBM 干细胞的自我分化提供了更好的微环境。本工作中进行的组织学和免疫组织化学研究通过显示 hBM 祖细胞在基质内的整合、自我组织和自我分化,证实了 PCL 基质在骨科环境中的再生潜力。观察到包括矿化、自我组织的“原骨小梁”结构和体外红细胞生成在内的分化产物,同时记录了预期的骨髓分化标志物的表达,包括 CD-99(>70%)、CD-71(>60%)和 CD-61(>5%)。所有研究均在没有添加任何外源性化学或激素刺激的情况下进行,仅利用了惰性的生物材料聚己内酯;这使本工作与大多数当代合成骨支架制造的研究工作区分开来。总之,本研究证明了 3D 打印 PCL 支架在干细胞扩增和纳入通过 PME 制造技术创建的高级微结构中的独特临床潜力,以生成具有显著自体移植物特征的生理性惰性临时骨缺损移植物,从而增强终末期愈合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/2ba55e57c35b/ijms-24-04940-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/fe92fad6dd5d/ijms-24-04940-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/58794624230c/ijms-24-04940-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/2e70a5b67063/ijms-24-04940-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/526f79e9de12/ijms-24-04940-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/2f6ffda83b6e/ijms-24-04940-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/cdbeca81a6f9/ijms-24-04940-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/02ace8c3b2b5/ijms-24-04940-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/abf681d08867/ijms-24-04940-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/96c5fd03afec/ijms-24-04940-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/871e5c2b6744/ijms-24-04940-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/2abc901acfaa/ijms-24-04940-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/3d4f9575c500/ijms-24-04940-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/2ba55e57c35b/ijms-24-04940-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/fe92fad6dd5d/ijms-24-04940-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/58794624230c/ijms-24-04940-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/2e70a5b67063/ijms-24-04940-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/526f79e9de12/ijms-24-04940-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/2f6ffda83b6e/ijms-24-04940-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/cdbeca81a6f9/ijms-24-04940-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/02ace8c3b2b5/ijms-24-04940-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/abf681d08867/ijms-24-04940-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/96c5fd03afec/ijms-24-04940-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/871e5c2b6744/ijms-24-04940-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/2abc901acfaa/ijms-24-04940-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/3d4f9575c500/ijms-24-04940-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be6/10003608/2ba55e57c35b/ijms-24-04940-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
Osteoregenerative Potential of 3D-Printed Poly -Caprolactone Tissue Scaffolds In Vitro Using Minimally Manipulative Expansion of Primary Human Bone Marrow Stem Cells.体外使用最小化操作的原代人骨髓基质干细胞扩增三维打印聚己内酯组织支架的成骨再生潜力。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 3;24(5):4940. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054940.
2
Stem Cell-Seeded 3D-Printed Scaffolds Combined with Self-Assembling Peptides for Bone Defect Repair.干细胞种植的 3D 打印支架与自组装肽结合用于骨缺损修复。
Tissue Eng Part A. 2022 Feb;28(3-4):111-124. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2021.0055. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
Enhanced osteogenic activity by MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts on chemically surface-modified poly(ε-caprolactone) 3D-printed scaffolds compared to RGD immobilized scaffolds.MC3T3-E1 前成骨细胞在化学表面改性聚己内酯 3D 打印支架上的增强成骨活性优于 RGD 固定支架。
Biomed Mater. 2018 Nov 13;14(1):015008. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aaeb82.
4
3D printed O-generating scaffolds enhance osteoprogenitor- and type H vessel recruitment during bone healing.3D 打印的 O 生成支架在骨愈合过程中增强成骨前体细胞和成 H 型血管的募集。
Acta Biomater. 2024 Sep 1;185:126-143. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.07.011. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
5
Lithium Chloride-Releasing 3D Printed Scaffold for Enhanced Cartilage Regeneration.用于增强软骨再生的释锂 3D 打印支架。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 May 31;25:4041-4050. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916918.
6
3D-Printed Bioactive Calcium Silicate/Poly-ε-Caprolactone Bioscaffolds Modified with Biomimetic Extracellular Matrices for Bone Regeneration.3D 打印生物活性硅酸钙/聚己内酯生物支架,经仿生细胞外基质修饰,用于骨再生。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 21;20(4):942. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040942.
7
Coating 3D Printed Polycaprolactone Scaffolds with Nanocellulose Promotes Growth and Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.纳米纤维素涂层 3D 打印聚己内酯支架促进间充质干细胞的生长和分化。
Biomacromolecules. 2018 Nov 12;19(11):4307-4319. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01194. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
8
3D-Printed Demineralized Bone Matrix-Based Conductive Scaffolds Combined with Electrical Stimulation for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.3D 打印脱钙骨基质基导电支架联合电刺激在骨组织工程中的应用。
ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024 Jul 15;7(7):4366-4378. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.4c00236. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
9
Osteogenic potentials in canine mesenchymal stem cells: unraveling the efficacy of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffolds in veterinary bone regeneration.犬骨髓间充质干细胞的成骨潜能:揭示聚己内酯/羟基磷灰石支架在兽医骨再生中的疗效。
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Sep 9;20(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04246-x.
10
[Dopamine modified and cartilage derived morphogenetic protein 1 laden polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds fabricated by three-dimensional printing improve chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells].[多巴胺修饰且负载软骨源性形态发生蛋白1的聚己内酯-羟基磷灰石复合支架通过三维打印制备,可改善人骨髓间充质干细胞的软骨分化]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 15;32(2):215-222. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201708017.

引用本文的文献

1
The Potential of Composite Cements for Wound Healing in Rats.复合水泥对大鼠伤口愈合的潜力
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Aug 16;11(8):837. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11080837.
2
Towards Polycaprolactone-Based Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Tissue Engineering: A Biomimetic Approach in a 3D Printing Technique.用于肺泡骨组织工程的聚己内酯基支架:3D 打印技术中的仿生方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 10;24(22):16180. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216180.
3
In Vitro Study of Composite Cements on Mesenchymal Stem Cells of Palatal Origin.腭源性间充质干细胞的复合水门汀的体外研究。

本文引用的文献

1
3D Printing in Regenerative Medicine: Technologies and Resources Utilized.3D 打印在再生医学中的应用:技术与资源利用
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 23;23(23):14621. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314621.
2
The clinical performance of ultra-low-dose shoulder CT scans: The assessment on image and physical 3D printing models.超低剂量肩部 CT 扫描的临床性能:对图像和物理 3D 打印模型的评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 26;17(9):e0275297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275297. eCollection 2022.
3
Biodegradable Iron and Porous Iron: Mechanical Properties, Degradation Behaviour, Manufacturing Routes and Biomedical Applications.
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 30;24(13):10911. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310911.
可生物降解铁与多孔铁:力学性能、降解行为、制造工艺及生物医学应用
J Funct Biomater. 2022 Jun 1;13(2):72. doi: 10.3390/jfb13020072.
4
Strategies for large bone defect reconstruction after trauma, infections or tumour excision: a comprehensive review of the literature.创伤、感染或肿瘤切除后大骨缺损的重建策略:文献综述。
Eur J Med Res. 2021 Oct 2;26(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00593-9.
5
Bone Healing and Inflammation: Principles of Fracture and Repair.骨愈合与炎症:骨折与修复原理
Semin Plast Surg. 2021 Aug;35(3):198-203. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1732334. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
6
Three-Dimensional Zirconia-Based Scaffolds for Load-Bearing Bone-Regeneration Applications: Prospects and Challenges.用于承重骨再生应用的三维氧化锆基支架:前景与挑战
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 10;14(12):3207. doi: 10.3390/ma14123207.
7
Autologous bone graft: Is it still the gold standard?自体骨移植:它仍然是金标准吗?
Injury. 2021 Jun;52 Suppl 2:S18-S22. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.043. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
Masquelet's induced membrane technique: Review of current concepts and future directions.Masquelet 诱导膜技术:当前概念与未来方向的综述。
J Orthop Res. 2021 Apr;39(4):707-718. doi: 10.1002/jor.24978. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
9
Cryogenic 3D printing of dual-delivery scaffolds for improved bone regeneration with enhanced vascularization.用于改善骨再生并增强血管化的双递送支架的低温3D打印。
Bioact Mater. 2020 Aug 12;6(1):137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.07.007. eCollection 2021 Jan.
10
Synthetic and Bone tissue engineering graft substitutes: What is the future?合成与骨组织工程移植物替代物:未来如何?
Injury. 2021 Jun;52 Suppl 2:S72-S77. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.040. Epub 2020 Jul 19.