Suppr超能文献

双胎引产——双重麻烦?

Induction of Labor in Twins-Double Trouble?

作者信息

Lopian Miriam, Kashani-Ligumsky Lior, Cohen Ronnie, Wiener Izaak, Amir Bat-Chen, Gold Zamir Yael, Many Ariel, Rosen Hadar

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayanei Hayeshua Medical Center, Bnei Brak 51544, Israel.

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 4;12(5):2041. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052041.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine and compare the safety and efficacy of different methods of induction of labor in twin gestations and their effect on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at a single university-affiliated medical center. Patients with a twin gestation undergoing induction of labor at >32 + 0 weeks comprised the study group. Outcomes were compared to patients with a twin gestation at >32 + 0 weeks who went into labor spontaneously. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative vaginal delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, uterine rupture, 5 min APGAR < 7, and umbilical artery pH < 7.1. A subgroup analysis comparing outcomes for the induction of labor with oral prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), IV Oxytocin ± artificial rupture of membranes (AROM), and extra-amniotic balloon (EAB)+ IV Oxytocin was performed. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, ANOVA, and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

268 patients who underwent induction of labor with a twin gestation comprised the study group. 450 patients with a twin gestation who went into labor spontaneously comprised the control group. There were no clinically significant differences between the groups for maternal age, gestational age, neonatal birthweight, birthweight discordancy, and non-vertex second twin. There were significantly more nulliparas in the study group compared to the control group (23.9% vs. 13.8% < 0.001). The study group was significantly more likely to undergo a cesarean delivery of at least one twin (12.3% vs. 7.5% OR, 1.7 95% CI 1.04-2.85 = 0.03). However, there was no significant difference in the rate of operative vaginal delivery (15.3% vs. 19.6% OR, 0.74, 95% CI 0.5-1.1 = 0.16), PPH (5.2% vs. 6.9% OR, 0.75 95% CI 0.39-1.42 = 0.37), 5-min APGAR scores < 7 (0% vs. 0.2% OR, 0.99 95%CI 0.99-1.00 = 0.27), umbilical artery pH < 7.1 (1.5% vs. 1.3% OR, 1.12 95% CI 0.3-4.0), or combined adverse outcome (7.8% vs. 8.7% OR, 0.93 95% CI 0.6-1.4 = 0.85). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the rates of cesarean delivery or combined adverse outcomes in patients undergoing induction with oral PGE1 compared to IV Oxytocin ± AROM (13.3% vs. 12.5% OR, 1.1 95% CI 0.4-2.0 = 1.0) (7% vs. 9.3% OR, 0.77 95% CI 0.5-3.5 = 0.63 ) or EAB+ IV Oxytocin (13.3% vs. 6.9% OR, 2.1 95% CI 0.1-2.1 = 0.53) (7% vs. 6.9% OR, 1.4 95% CI 0.15-3.5 = 0.5) or between patients undergoing induction of labor with IV Oxytocin ± AROM and EAB+ IV Oxytocin (12.5% vs. 6.9% OR, 2.1 95% CI 0.1-2.4 = 0.52) (9.3% vs. 6.9% OR, 0.98 95% CI 0.2-4.7 = 0.54). There were no cases of uterine rupture in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction of labor in twin gestations is associated with a two-fold increased risk of cesarean delivery, although this is not associated with adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. Furthermore, the method of induction of labor used does not affect the chances of success nor the rate of adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.

摘要

目的

确定并比较双胎妊娠不同引产方法的安全性和有效性及其对孕产妇和新生儿结局的影响。

方法

在一家大学附属医院进行了一项回顾性观察队列研究。孕周>32 + 0周的双胎妊娠引产患者组成研究组。将结局与孕周>32 + 0周自然临产的双胎妊娠患者进行比较。主要结局是剖宫产。次要结局包括阴道助产、产后出血、子宫破裂、5分钟阿氏评分<7以及脐动脉pH<7.1。对口服前列腺素E1(PGE1)引产、静脉滴注缩宫素±人工破膜(AROM)引产和羊膜外球囊(EAB)+静脉滴注缩宫素引产的结局进行亚组分析。数据采用Fisher精确检验、方差分析和卡方检验进行分析。

结果

研究组包括268例双胎妊娠引产患者。对照组包括450例双胎妊娠自然临产患者。两组在产妇年龄、孕周、新生儿出生体重、出生体重差异和非头位第二胎儿方面无临床显著差异。与对照组相比,研究组初产妇明显更多(23.9%对13.8%,P<0.001)。研究组至少有一个胎儿行剖宫产的可能性明显更高(12.3%对7.5%,OR 1.7,95%CI 1.04 - 2.85,P = 0.03)。然而,阴道助产率(15.3%对19.6%,OR 0.74,95%CI 0.5 - 1.1,P = 0.16)、产后出血率(5.2%对6.9%,OR 0.75,95%CI 0.39 - 1.42,P = 0.37)、5分钟阿氏评分<7的比例(0%对0.2%,OR 0.99,95%CI 0.99 - 1.00,P = 0.27)、脐动脉pH<7.1的比例(1.5%对1.3%,OR 1.12,95%CI 0.3 - 4.0)或联合不良结局比例(7.8%对8.7%,OR 0.93,95%CI 0.6 - 1.4,P = 0.85)均无显著差异。此外,口服PGE1引产患者与静脉滴注缩宫素±AROM引产患者相比,剖宫产率或联合不良结局率无显著差异(13.3%对12.5%,OR 1.1,95%CI 0.4 - 2.0,P = 1.0)(7%对9.3%,OR 0.77,95%CI 0.5 - 3.5,P = 0.63);与EAB +静脉滴注缩宫素引产患者相比也无显著差异(13.3%对6.9%,OR 2.1,95%CI 0.1 - 2.1,P = 0.53)(7%对6.9%,OR 1.4,95%CI 0.15 - 3.5,P = 0.5);静脉滴注缩宫素±AROM引产患者与EAB +静脉滴注缩宫素引产患者相比同样无显著差异(12.5%对6.9%,OR 2.1,95%CI 0.1 - 2.4,P = 0.52)(9.3%对6.9%,OR 0.98,95%CI 0.2 - 4.7,P = 0.54)。本研究中无子宫破裂病例。

结论

双胎妊娠引产与剖宫产风险增加两倍相关,尽管这与孕产妇或新生儿不良结局无关。此外,所采用的引产方法不影响成功几率,也不影响孕产妇或新生儿不良结局的发生率。

相似文献

1
Induction of Labor in Twins-Double Trouble?双胎引产——双重麻烦?
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 4;12(5):2041. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052041.
2
Trial of labor of vertex-nonvertex twins following a previous cesarean delivery.经剖宫产分娩后的头位-非头位双胎试产。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Jul;4(4):100640. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100640. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
5
Delivery of monochorionic twins: lessons learned from the Twin Birth Study.单绒毛膜双胎分娩:来自双胎出生研究的经验教训。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):916.e1-916.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.048. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Induction of labor in twin pregnancies - A retrospective cohort study.双胎妊娠引产 - 一项回顾性队列研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022 Jun;32:100724. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100724. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.小剂量口服米索前列醇用于引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 22;6(6):CD014484. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014484.
5
Length of the Second Stage of Labor in Women Delivering Twins.第二产程时长与双胎分娩产妇
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr 1;137(4):664-669. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004308.
7
Risk of cesarean after induction of labor in twin compared to singleton pregnancies.与单胎妊娠相比,双胎妊娠行引产的剖宫产风险。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun;237:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验