• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计划生育是否有助于食品安全?来自埃塞俄比亚的证据。

Does Voluntary Family Planning Contribute to Food Security? Evidence from Ethiopia.

机构信息

Amref Health Africa in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa bole subcity, Woreda, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 20855, Ethiopia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2023 Feb 21;15(5):1081. doi: 10.3390/nu15051081.

DOI:10.3390/nu15051081
PMID:36904080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10005042/
Abstract

This study aims to explore the effects of voluntary family planning (FP) utilization on food security in selected districts of Ethiopia. Quantitative research methods were used to conduct a community-based study among a sample of 737 women of reproductive age. The data were analyzed using a hierarchical logistic regression constructed in three models. The findings showed 579 (78.2%) were using FP at the time of the survey. According to the household-level food insecurity access scale, 55.2% of households experienced food insecurity. The likelihood of food security was lower by 64% for women who used FP for less than 21 months (AOR = 0.64: 95%CI: 0.42-0.99) in comparison to mothers who used FP for more than 21 months. Households having positive adaptive behaviors were three times more likely (AOR = 3.60: 95%CI 2.07-6.26) to have food security in comparison to those not having positive adaptive behaviors. This study also revealed that almost half of the mothers (AOR: 0.51: 95%CI: 0.33-0.80) who reported being influenced by other family members to use FP had food security, in comparison to their counterparts. Age, duration of FP use, positive adaptive behaviors, and influence by significant others were found to be independent predictors of food security in the study areas. Culturally sensitive strategies need to be considered to expand awareness and dispel misconceptions that lead to hesitancy around FP utilization. Design strategies should take into account households' resilience in adaptive skills during shocks, natural disasters, or pandemics which will be invaluable for food security.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在埃塞俄比亚选定地区,自愿计划生育(FP)利用对食品安全的影响。采用定量研究方法,对 737 名育龄妇女进行了社区为基础的研究。数据采用三级逻辑回归模型进行分析。研究结果显示,78.2%的受访者当时正在使用 FP。根据家庭层面的粮食不安全获取量表,55.2%的家庭经历粮食不安全。与使用 FP 超过 21 个月的母亲相比,使用 FP 不足 21 个月的母亲粮食安全的可能性降低了 64%(AOR=0.64:95%CI:0.42-0.99)。与没有积极适应行为的家庭相比,有积极适应行为的家庭获得粮食安全的可能性要高出三倍(AOR=3.60:95%CI 2.07-6.26)。本研究还表明,近一半(AOR:0.51:95%CI:0.33-0.80)报告受到其他家庭成员影响而使用 FP 的母亲获得了粮食安全,而对照组则没有。研究地区发现,年龄、FP 使用时间、积极的适应行为和他人的影响是粮食安全的独立预测因素。需要考虑采取文化上敏感的策略来扩大意识,消除对 FP 使用的犹豫不决的误解。设计策略应考虑到家庭在冲击、自然灾害或大流行病期间适应技能的弹性,这对粮食安全将是非常宝贵的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0fb/10005042/ffb8022e9a1d/nutrients-15-01081-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0fb/10005042/56fc8316f7b7/nutrients-15-01081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0fb/10005042/b3735048c0c0/nutrients-15-01081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0fb/10005042/d220eee4a006/nutrients-15-01081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0fb/10005042/ffb8022e9a1d/nutrients-15-01081-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0fb/10005042/56fc8316f7b7/nutrients-15-01081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0fb/10005042/b3735048c0c0/nutrients-15-01081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0fb/10005042/d220eee4a006/nutrients-15-01081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0fb/10005042/ffb8022e9a1d/nutrients-15-01081-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Voluntary Family Planning Contribute to Food Security? Evidence from Ethiopia.计划生育是否有助于食品安全?来自埃塞俄比亚的证据。
Nutrients. 2023 Feb 21;15(5):1081. doi: 10.3390/nu15051081.
2
Level and determinants of food insecurity in East and West Gojjam zones of Amhara Region, Ethiopia: a community based comparative cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉州戈贾姆东部和西部地区粮食不安全状况及决定因素:一项基于社区的比较横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 11;16:503. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3186-7.
3
Spatial exploration of non-resilience to food insecurity, its association with COVID-19 and household coping strategies in East Gojjam districts, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020.2020 年,埃塞俄比亚西北贡德尔地区东戈贾姆区食物不安全非弹性的空间探索及其与 COVID-19 的关系和家庭应对策略。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 15;12(1):15511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19963-2.
4
Effectiveness of the population health and environment approach in improving family planning outcomes in the Gurage, Zone South Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚南部古拉格地区人口健康与环境方法在改善计划生育成果方面的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 13;15:1123. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2484-9.
5
Predictors of chronic food insecurity among adolescents in Southwest Ethiopia: a longitudinal study.预测埃塞俄比亚西南部青少年慢性食物不安全的因素:一项纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 3;12:604. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-604.
6
Prevalence and associated factors for rural households food insecurity in selected districts of east Gojjam zone, northern Ethiopia: cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚北部东戈贾姆地区部分选区农村家庭食物不安全状况的流行率及相关因素:横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 7;20(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8220-0.
7
Integration of family planning services with HIV treatment for women of reproductive age attending ART clinic in Oromia regional state, Ethiopia.将计划生育服务与艾滋病毒治疗整合起来,为在埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚州接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的育龄妇女提供服务。
Reprod Health. 2021 May 22;18(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01157-0.
8
Food insecurity status and determinants among Urban Productive Safety Net Program beneficiary households in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴城市生产安全网项目受益家庭的粮食不安全状况及决定因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 27;16(9):e0256634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256634. eCollection 2021.
9
Household food insecurity and coping strategies among rural households in Kedida Gamela District, Kembata-Tembaro zone, Southern Ethiopia: mixed-methods concurrent triangulation design.埃塞俄比亚南部肯巴塔-滕巴罗地区凯迪达加梅拉区农村家庭的家庭粮食不安全状况及应对策略:混合方法同步三角测量设计
BMC Nutr. 2023 Jan 3;9(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40795-022-00663-z.
10
Magnitude and associated factors of unmet need for family planning among rural women in Ethiopia: a multilevel cross-sectional analysis.埃塞俄比亚农村妇女计划生育未满足需求的规模及相关因素:一项多层次横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 9;11(4):e044060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044060.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of Modern Contraception Use Among Ever-Married Women in Bangladesh: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.孟加拉国已婚女性现代避孕措施使用的决定因素:一项全国性横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;8(7):e71033. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71033. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The Role of Family Planning in Enhancing Community Resilience: Insights from Drought-Affected Youths and Women in Ethiopia.计划生育在增强社区复原力中的作用:来自埃塞俄比亚受干旱影响的青年和妇女的见解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 1;22(1):53. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010053.

本文引用的文献

1
Why food insecurity persists in sub-Saharan Africa: A review of existing evidence.撒哈拉以南非洲地区粮食不安全状况持续存在的原因:现有证据综述
Food Secur. 2022;14(4):845-864. doi: 10.1007/s12571-022-01256-1. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
2
Prevalence and Determinants of Contraceptive Utilization among Women in the Reproductive Age Group in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚育龄妇女避孕方法的使用情况及决定因素。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Dec;9(6):2340-2350. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01171-9. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
3
Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in Relation to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in the Oromia Region of Ethiopia.
埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚地区水、环境卫生和个人卫生领域的性别平等和社会包容
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;18(8):4281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084281.
4
Gender Inequality and the Sexual and Reproductive Health Status of Young and Older Women in the Afar Region of Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚阿法尔地区的性别不平等与青年和老年女性的性与生殖健康状况
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 26;17(12):4592. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124592.
5
Factors Affecting Food Security in Women Enrolled in a Program for Vulnerable Group Development.参与弱势群体发展项目的女性的粮食安全影响因素
Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 Mar 19;4(4):nzaa037. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa037. eCollection 2020 Apr.
6
Human fertility in relation to education, economy, religion, contraception, and family planning programs.人类生育力与教育、经济、宗教、避孕和计划生育项目的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 22;20(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8331-7.
7
Household food insecurity and coping strategies among pensioners in Jimma Town, South West Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西南部吉姆马镇养老金领取者的家庭粮食不安全及其应对策略。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 14;18(1):1373. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6291-y.
8
Dissemination and use of WHO family planning guidance and tools: a qualitative assessment.世卫组织计划生育指导意见和工具的传播和使用:定性评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 22;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0321-1.
9
Investing in Family Planning: Key to Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.计划生育投资:实现可持续发展目标的关键。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Jun 27;4(2):191-210. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00374. Print 2016 Jun 20.
10
Differentials of modern contraceptive methods use by food security status among married women of reproductive age in Wolaita Zone, South Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚南部沃莱塔地区已婚育龄妇女按粮食安全状况划分的现代避孕方法使用差异
Arch Public Health. 2015 Sep 28;73:38. doi: 10.1186/s13690-015-0089-5. eCollection 2015.