Department of Applied Health, Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville, Campus Box 1126, Edwardsville, IL 62026, USA.
Health Education & Behavior, University of Florida, 1864 Stadium Road, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.
Nutrients. 2023 Feb 23;15(5):1108. doi: 10.3390/nu15051108.
Ten percent of Americans are food-insecure. Few known studies have accessed college food insecurity via random sampling. An online cross-sectional survey ( = 1087) was distributed via email to a random sample of undergraduate college students. Food insecurity was determined by the USDA Food Security Short Form. Data were analyzed using JMP Pro. Results: Thirty-six percent of the students were food-insecure. Most food-insecure students were enrolled full-time (93.6%), female (81.2%), received financial aid (77.9%), lived off-campus (75.0%), non-white (59.6%), and employed (51.7%). Food-insecure students had a significantly lower GPA ( < 0.001 *), were more likely to be non-white ( < 0.0001 *), and were more likely to have received financial aid compared to food-secure students ( < 0.0001 *). Food-insecure students were significantly more likely to have lived in government housing, had free or reduced lunch, used SNAP and WIC benefits, and received food from a food bank during childhood ( < 0.0001 * for all). Food-insecure students were significantly less likely to report that they experienced a food shortage to counseling and wellness personnel, a resident assistant, and their parents ( < 0.05 * for all). Discussion: College students might be at greater risk for food insecurity if they are non-white, first-generation students, employed, on financial aid, and have a history of accessing government assistance during childhood.
10%的美国人面临食物无保障问题。很少有已知的研究通过随机抽样来评估大学生的食物无保障问题。本研究通过电子邮件向大学生随机样本发放了一份在线横断面调查(n = 1087)。食物无保障问题由美国农业部(USDA)食物保障短式问卷确定。使用 JMP Pro 分析数据。结果:36%的学生面临食物无保障问题。大多数食物无保障的学生为全日制学生(93.6%),女性(81.2%),获得经济资助(77.9%),校外居住(75.0%),非白人(59.6%),和有工作(51.7%)。与食物有保障的学生相比,食物无保障的学生 GPA 显著更低(<0.001*),更有可能是非白人(<0.0001*),且更有可能获得经济资助(<0.0001*)。与食物有保障的学生相比,食物无保障的学生更有可能在政府住房中居住过,享受过免费或减价午餐,使用过食品券和妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划(WIC)福利,在童年时期从食品银行获得过食物(<0.0001*)。与食物有保障的学生相比,食物无保障的学生向咨询和健康中心人员、住宿助理和父母报告食物短缺的可能性显著更低(<0.05*)。讨论:如果大学生是非白人、第一代学生、有工作、获得经济资助,且在童年时期有过获取政府援助的经历,他们可能面临更大的食物无保障风险。