Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023 Mar;123(3):438-453.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
Previous research has reported negative health consequences and poor academic achievement among college students who are food insecure. It is unknown if students with food insecurity's experiences qualitatively differ from students who are food secure.
To qualitatively evaluate experiences of students who are food secure and food insecure with internal and external factors related to food insecurity.
Trained interviewers conducted in-person qualitative interviews from February to August 2018 to gain insights about eating patterns, food environment, financial situation, and ideas for addressing food insecurity on college campuses with students who are food secure and food insecure.
Students from three universities in the western United States (N = 58) who were classified as food secure (n = 28) and food insecure (n = 30) using the US Department of Agriculture's 6-item Food Security Module participated in this study.
Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis. A random sample of transcripts were independently coded to determine interrater reliability. Researchers divided transcripts for final coding and overarching themes were discussed. Descriptive statistics were used.
Students who were both food secure and food insecure obtained food from similar sources (eg, grocery stores); had unexpected expenses that led to financial constraints; indicated transportation barriers altered the amount or package size of food purchased; and reported similar knowledge, attitudes, use, and familial history of food assistance. Students with food insecurity uniquely reported prioritizing rent or other living expenses over food, and when funds were low, reducing food intake, experiencing a variable food supply throughout the month, or using strategies like donating plasma or selling possessions to enhance financial stability.
This study helps nutrition and dietetics practitioners better understand how college students' experiences with factors related to food insecurity differ by food security status. Future quantitative research is needed to confirm the coping strategies identified among students with food insecurity in this study.
先前的研究报告称,在食物无保障的大学生中存在负面健康后果和学业成绩不佳的情况。目前尚不清楚食物无保障的学生的经历是否与食物有保障的学生的经历有质的不同。
从与食物无保障相关的内部和外部因素出发,定性评估食物有保障和食物无保障的学生的体验。
2018 年 2 月至 8 月,经过培训的访谈者与食物有保障和无保障的学生进行了面对面的定性访谈,以了解他们在校园内的饮食模式、食物环境、财务状况以及解决食物无保障问题的想法。
来自美国西部三所大学的学生(N=58)参与了这项研究,他们使用美国农业部的 6 项食物保障模块被分为食物有保障(n=28)和食物无保障(n=30)。
访谈被录音并逐字记录。使用常规内容分析对数据进行分析。随机选择转录本进行独立编码以确定评分者间的可靠性。研究人员将转录本分开进行最终编码,并讨论了总体主题。使用描述性统计。
食物有保障和无保障的学生都从类似的来源获取食物(例如,杂货店);有意外开支导致财务紧张;表明交通障碍改变了购买的食物数量或包装尺寸;并报告了类似的知识、态度、使用和家庭食物援助史。食物无保障的学生特别报告说,他们优先考虑租金或其他生活费用而不是食物,当资金紧张时,他们会减少食物摄入量,在整个月内食物供应不稳定,或者使用捐赠血浆或出售财产等策略来增强财务稳定性。
这项研究有助于营养和饮食学从业者更好地了解大学生与食物无保障相关的经历如何因食物保障状况而异。未来需要进行定量研究来确认本研究中食物无保障学生确定的应对策略。