• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于信息量和频率比的机器学习滑坡敏感性评价:以中国威信县为例。

Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation of Machine Learning Based on Information Volume and Frequency Ratio: A Case Study of Weixin County, China.

机构信息

Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China.

Key Laboratory of Geospatial Information Integration Innovation for Smart Mines, Kunming 650093, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;23(5):2549. doi: 10.3390/s23052549.

DOI:10.3390/s23052549
PMID:36904752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10007018/
Abstract

A landslide is one of the most destructive natural disasters in the world. The accurate modeling and prediction of landslide hazards have been used as some of the vital tools for landslide disaster prevention and control. The purpose of this study was to explore the application of coupling models in landslide susceptibility evaluation. This paper used Weixin County as the research object. First, according to the landslide catalog database constructed, there were 345 landslides in the study area. Twelve environmental factors were selected, including terrain (elevation, slope, slope direction, plane curvature, and profile curvature), geological structure (stratigraphic lithology and distance from fault zone), meteorological hydrology (average annual rainfall and distance to rivers), and land cover (NDVI, land use, and distance to roads). Then, a single model (logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest) and a coupled model (IV-LR, IV-SVM, IV-RF, FR-LR, FR-SVM, and FR-RF) based on information volume and frequency ratio were constructed, and the accuracy and reliability of the models were compared and analyzed. Finally, the influence of environmental factors on landslide susceptibility under the optimal model was discussed. The results showed that the prediction accuracy of the nine models ranged from 75.2% (LR model) to 94.9% (FR-RF model), and the coupling accuracy was generally higher than that of the single model. Therefore, the coupling model could improve the prediction accuracy of the model to a certain extent. The FR-RF coupling model had the highest accuracy. Under the optimal model FR-RF, distance from the road, NDVI, and land use were the three most important environmental factors, ac-counting for 20.15%, 13.37%, and 9.69%, respectively. Therefore, it was necessary for Weixin County to strengthen the monitoring of mountains near roads and areas with sparse vegetation to prevent landslides caused by human activities and rainfall.

摘要

滑坡是世界上最具破坏性的自然灾害之一。准确地对滑坡灾害进行建模和预测,已被用作滑坡灾害防治的重要工具之一。本研究旨在探讨耦合模型在滑坡易发性评价中的应用。本文以威信县为研究对象,首先根据构建的滑坡目录数据库,研究区内有 345 个滑坡。选取了 12 个环境因子,包括地形(海拔、坡度、坡度方向、平面曲率和剖面曲率)、地质构造(地层岩性和距断裂带的距离)、气象水文(年平均降雨量和距河流的距离)和土地覆盖(NDVI、土地利用和距道路的距离)。然后,构建了基于信息量和频率比的单模型(逻辑回归、支持向量机和随机森林)和耦合模型(IV-LR、IV-SVM、IV-RF、FR-LR、FR-SVM 和 FR-RF),并对模型的准确性和可靠性进行了比较和分析。最后,讨论了最优模型下环境因素对滑坡易发性的影响。结果表明,9 个模型的预测精度范围为 75.2%(LR 模型)至 94.9%(FR-RF 模型),耦合精度普遍高于单模型。因此,耦合模型可以在一定程度上提高模型的预测精度。FR-RF 耦合模型的精度最高。在最优模型 FR-RF 下,距道路的距离、NDVI 和土地利用是三个最重要的环境因素,分别占 20.15%、13.37%和 9.69%。因此,威信县有必要加强对道路附近山体和植被稀疏地区的监测,以防止人类活动和降雨引发的滑坡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/ca4bee6e975a/sensors-23-02549-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/7ca2dbaf3ee8/sensors-23-02549-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/4f8e766ed1cf/sensors-23-02549-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/ad9f6f02e46c/sensors-23-02549-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/4a62868a39b9/sensors-23-02549-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/7cd3243e8509/sensors-23-02549-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/c99385a50ffb/sensors-23-02549-g006a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/f5572a9dd0d5/sensors-23-02549-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/3abd129015a5/sensors-23-02549-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/f3e540cb03b0/sensors-23-02549-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/ca4bee6e975a/sensors-23-02549-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/7ca2dbaf3ee8/sensors-23-02549-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/4f8e766ed1cf/sensors-23-02549-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/ad9f6f02e46c/sensors-23-02549-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/4a62868a39b9/sensors-23-02549-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/7cd3243e8509/sensors-23-02549-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/c99385a50ffb/sensors-23-02549-g006a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/f5572a9dd0d5/sensors-23-02549-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/3abd129015a5/sensors-23-02549-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/f3e540cb03b0/sensors-23-02549-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cfc/10007018/ca4bee6e975a/sensors-23-02549-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation of Machine Learning Based on Information Volume and Frequency Ratio: A Case Study of Weixin County, China.基于信息量和频率比的机器学习滑坡敏感性评价:以中国威信县为例。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;23(5):2549. doi: 10.3390/s23052549.
2
Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China.中国江西瑞金滑坡易发性分区
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 31;18(11):5906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115906.
3
Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China).随机森林模型与频率比模型在渝阳区(中国重庆)滑坡易发性制图(LSM)中的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;17(12):4206. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124206.
4
Research on landslide susceptibility prediction model based on LSTM-RF-MDBN.基于 LSTM-RF-MDBN 的滑坡易发性预测模型研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(1):1504-1516. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31232-x. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
5
Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Based on CF-SVM in Nujiang Prefecture.基于 CF-SVM 的怒江地区滑坡易发性评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21):14248. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114248.
6
A Statistical Prediction Model for Healthcare and Landslide Sensitivity Evaluation in Coal Mining Subsidence Area.煤矿采空区的医疗保健和滑坡敏感性评估的统计预测模型。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 14;2022:1805689. doi: 10.1155/2022/1805689. eCollection 2022.
7
GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping in the Longmen Mountain area (China) using three different machine learning algorithms and their comparison.基于 GIS 的龙门山地区(中国)滑坡敏感性制图研究,使用三种不同的机器学习算法及其比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(38):88612-88626. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28730-3. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
8
Hybrid Integration Approach of Entropy with Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling.用于滑坡易发性建模的熵与逻辑回归及支持向量机的混合集成方法
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Nov 17;20(11):884. doi: 10.3390/e20110884.
9
Evaluation of landslides susceptibility in Southeastern Tibet considering seismic sensitivity.考虑地震敏感性的藏东南地区滑坡易发性评价
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 23;10(18):e36800. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36800. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
10
Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China.利用 SMOTE 优化机器学习方法在浙江省丽水市滑坡易发性制图中的预测能力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 28;16(3):368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030368.

引用本文的文献

1
Study on landslide susceptibility mapping with different factor screening methods and random forest models.基于不同因子筛选方法和随机森林模型的滑坡易发性区划研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 12;18(10):e0292897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292897. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Combined SBAS-InSAR and PSO-RF Algorithm for Evaluating the Susceptibility Prediction of Landslide in Complex Mountainous Area: A Case Study of Ludian County, China.联合 SBAS-InSAR 和 PSO-RF 算法评估复杂山区滑坡敏感性预测:以中国鲁甸县为例。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 21;22(20):8041. doi: 10.3390/s22208041.
2
Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Integrated SBAS-InSAR Technique: A Case Study of Dongchuan District, Yunnan (China).基于 SBAS-InSAR 技术的滑坡敏感性制图:以云南东川地区为例。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 26;22(15):5587. doi: 10.3390/s22155587.
3
Introducing intense rainfall and snowmelt variables to implement a process-related non-stationary shallow landslide susceptibility analysis.
引入强降雨和融雪变量,以实施与过程相关的非平稳浅层滑坡易发性分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 10;786:147360. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147360. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
4
Spatial prediction of flood potential using new ensembles of bivariate statistics and artificial intelligence: A case study at the Putna river catchment of Romania.利用双变量统计和人工智能新集成方法进行洪水潜力的空间预测:以罗马尼亚普特纳河流域为例
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 15;691:1098-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.197. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
Flash-Flood Potential assessment in the upper and middle sector of Prahova river catchment (Romania). A comparative approach between four hybrid models.罗马尼亚普拉霍瓦河流域中上游地区的暴洪灾害风险评估。四种混合模型的比较研究
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 1;659:1115-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.397. Epub 2018 Dec 27.