• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别是否会影响左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建的结果?

Does Gender Affect the Outcomes of Myocardial Revascularization for Left-Main Coronary Artery Disease?

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Cardiology, Mohammed Bin Khalifa Specialist Cardiac Center, Kingdom of Bahrain, Manama, Bahrain.

出版信息

Angiology. 2024 Feb;75(2):182-189. doi: 10.1177/00033197231162481. Epub 2023 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1177/00033197231162481
PMID:36905204
Abstract

Currently, gender is not considered in the choice of the revascularization strategy for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. This study analyzed the effect of gender on the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ULMCA disease. Females who had PCI (n = 328) were compared with females who had CABG (n = 132) and PCI in males (n = 894) was compared with CABG (n = 784). Females with CABG had higher overall hospital mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) than females with PCI. Male patients with CABG had higher MACE; however, mortality did not differ between males with CABG vs PCI. In female patients, follow-up mortality was significantly higher in CABG patients, and target lesion revascularization was higher in patients with PCI. Male patients had no difference in mortality and MACE between groups; however, MI was higher with CABG, and congestive heart failure was higher with PCI. In conclusion, women with ULMCA disease treated with PCI could have better survival with lower MACE compared with CABG. These differences were not evident in males treated with either CABG or PCI. PCI could be the preferred revascularization strategy in women with ULMCA disease.

摘要

目前,在选择无保护左主干冠状动脉(ULMCA)疾病患者的血运重建策略时,并未考虑性别因素。本研究分析了性别对 ULMCA 疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗结局的影响。将接受 PCI 的女性患者(n=328)与接受 CABG 的女性患者(n=132)进行比较,并将接受 PCI 的男性患者(n=894)与接受 CABG 的男性患者(n=784)进行比较。与 PCI 相比,CABG 组的女性患者总体住院死亡率和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)更高。与 PCI 相比,CABG 组的男性患者 MACE 更高;但死亡率在 CABG 与 PCI 组之间无差异。在女性患者中,CABG 组的随访死亡率明显更高,而 PCI 组的靶病变血运重建更高。男性患者在死亡率和 MACE 方面在两组之间无差异;但 CABG 组的心肌梗死更高,而 PCI 组的充血性心力衰竭更高。总之,与 CABG 相比,接受 PCI 治疗的 ULMCA 疾病女性患者的生存率更高,MACE 更低。在接受 CABG 或 PCI 治疗的男性患者中,这些差异并不明显。对于 ULMCA 疾病女性患者,PCI 可能是首选的血运重建策略。

相似文献

1
Does Gender Affect the Outcomes of Myocardial Revascularization for Left-Main Coronary Artery Disease?性别是否会影响左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建的结果?
Angiology. 2024 Feb;75(2):182-189. doi: 10.1177/00033197231162481. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery surgery for left main disease according to lesion site: A meta-analysis.根据病变部位比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jul;166(1):120-132.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.08.040. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
3
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
4
Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左心室射血分数严重降低患者的长期预后
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):631-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0239.
5
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
6
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
7
Physiology-guided PCI versus CABG for left main coronary artery disease: insights from the DEFINE-LM registry.生理学指导下的 PCI 与 CABG 治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病:来自 DEFINE-LM 注册研究的见解。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023 Jul;38(3):287-298. doi: 10.1007/s12928-023-00932-z. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
8
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting in emergency and non-emergency unprotected left-main revascularization.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在急诊和非急诊非保护左主干血运重建中的应用比较。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jul 1;28(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01189-1.
9
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery from the DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.DELTA 注册研究:非保护左主干冠状动脉开口/中段病变行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期临床结果:多中心注册研究评估左主干病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(4):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
10
Long-Term Outcomes of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的长期结局:冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Mar;32(3):111-116. doi: 10.25270/jic/19.00292. Epub 2020 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of differences between men and women in short-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery.一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了男性和女性在冠状动脉旁路移植手术后短期结局方面的差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 5;14(1):20682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71414-2.
2
Leveraging machine learning to enhance postoperative risk assessment in coronary artery bypass grafting patients with unprotected left main disease: a retrospective cohort study.利用机器学习提高无保护左主干病变冠状动脉搭桥患者的术后风险评估:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7142-7149. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002032.