The role of anticoagulation clinics needs to be reassessed to include follow up of patients on direct oral anticoagulants.

A survey was carried out to assess the state of organization of care (including clinical and laboratory) delivered to patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) followed by clinics affiliated with the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA), traditionally engaged to assist anticoagulated outpatients within the country. Participants were asked to answer questions concerning (i) proportion of patients on VKA-vs-DOAC and (ii) whether dedicated testing for DOAC is available. The proportion of patients on VKA-vs-DOAC was 60 % vs 40 %. This proportion is in sharp contrast with the real-life distribution where DOAC outweigh VKA prescriptions. Furthermore, the proportion of anticoagulation clinics that provide DOAC testing (even in special situations) is relatively small (i.e., 31 % of the respondents). Furthermore, 25 % of those that declared to follow DOAC patients do not provide any testing at all. The answers to the above questions cause concerns as (i) most patients on DOAC within the country are probably on self-management, or they are managed by general practitioners or specialists outside thrombosis centers. (ii) Most patients on DOAC have no access to testing even in special situations where it would be needed. We feel that there is a (false) perception that the care needed for DOAC treatment can be much less than that required for VKA, as DOAC require prescription and not regular follow-up. A call for action should be urgently made to reassess the role of anticoagulation clinics, which should pay the same attention to patients on DOAC as those on VKA.