• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超过 48 小时病史的小儿肠套叠灌肠复位是否安全:一项回顾性队列研究。

Is enema reduction in pediatric intussusception with a history of over 48 h safe: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, PR China.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, PR China.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;68:33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.02.027. Epub 2023 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2023.02.027
PMID:36905884
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intussusception is one of the most common acute abdominal diseases in children. Enema reduction is the first-line treatment for intussusception in good condition. Clinically, a history of disease over 48 h is usually listed as a contraindication for enema reduction. However, with the development of clinical experience and therapy, an increasing number of cases have shown that the prolongation of the clinical course of intussusception in children is not an absolute contraindication for enema treatment. This study aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of enema reduction in children with a history of disease longer than 48 h.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective matched-pair cohort study of pediatric patients with acute intussusception between 2017 and 2021. All patients were treated with ultrasound-guided hydrostatic enema reduction. According to the length of history, the cases were classified into two groups: history <48 h (<48 h group) and history greater than or equal to 48 h (≧48 h group). We generated a 1:1 matched-pair cohort matched for sex, age, admission time, main symptoms, and concentric circle size on ultrasound. Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups, including success, recurrence, and perforation rates.

RESULTS

From January 2016 to November 2021, 2701 patients with intussusception were admitted to the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. A total of 494 cases were included in the ≧48 h group, and 494 cases with a history of <48 h were selected for matched comparison in the <48 h group. The success rates of the ≧48 h and <48 h groups were 98.18% vs. 97.37% (p = 0.388), and the recurrence rates were 13.36% vs. 11.94% (p = 0.635), showing no difference according to the length of history. The perforation rate was 0.61% vs. 0%, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.247).The comparison of the different history groups showed that in patients with bloody stools, the length of history had no significant effect on the enema reduction outcome(94.90% vs. 86.76%, p = 0.064).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic enema reduction is safe and effective for pediatric idiopathic intussusception with a history of ≧48 h.

摘要

背景

肠套叠是儿童最常见的急性腹部疾病之一。灌肠复位是肠套叠良好条件下的一线治疗方法。临床上,通常将疾病史超过 48 小时列为灌肠复位的禁忌症。然而,随着临床经验和治疗方法的发展,越来越多的病例表明,儿童肠套叠的临床病程延长并不是肠套叠治疗的绝对禁忌症。本研究旨在分析病史超过 48 小时的儿童进行灌肠复位的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们对 2017 年至 2021 年期间收治的小儿急性肠套叠患者进行了回顾性配对病例对照队列研究。所有患者均采用超声引导水压灌肠复位治疗。根据病史长短,病例分为两组:病史<48 小时(<48 h 组)和病史大于或等于 48 小时(≧48 h 组)。我们按照性别、年龄、入院时间、主要症状和超声同心圆大小进行了 1:1 配对病例对照。比较两组的临床结局,包括成功率、复发率和穿孔率。

结果

2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 11 月,中国医科大学盛京医院收治肠套叠患儿 2701 例。≧48 h 组共纳入 494 例,<48 h 组选择 494 例与之匹配。≧48 h 组和<48 h 组的成功率分别为 98.18%比 97.37%(p=0.388),复发率分别为 13.36%比 11.94%(p=0.635),按病史长短无差异。穿孔率分别为 0.61%和 0%,无显著性差异(p=0.247)。不同病史组比较显示,血便患儿的病史长短对灌肠复位效果无显著影响(94.90%比 86.76%,p=0.064)。

结论

超声引导水压灌肠复位治疗病史≧48 h 的小儿特发性肠套叠安全有效。

相似文献

1
Is enema reduction in pediatric intussusception with a history of over 48 h safe: A retrospective cohort study.超过 48 小时病史的小儿肠套叠灌肠复位是否安全:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;68:33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.02.027. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
2
Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction versus fluoroscopy-guided air reduction for pediatric intussusception: a multi-center, prospective, cohort study.超声引导水压复位与透视引导气复位治疗小儿肠套叠的多中心前瞻性队列研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00346-9.
3
Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents.超声引导水压复位肠套叠:小儿放射科专家与非小儿放射科医师或放射科住院医师成功率比较。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jul;182(7):3257-3264. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04987-1. Epub 2023 May 6.
4
[Hydrostatic enema outcome in patients with long history of ileocolic intussusception].[回结肠套叠病史较长患者的水压灌肠结果]
Cir Pediatr. 2019 Oct 1;32(4):190-194.
5
Ultrasound-guided reduction of intussusception: a safe and effective method performed by pediatric surgeons.超声引导下肠套叠复位:一种由小儿外科医生实施的安全有效的方法。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Jul;32(7):679-82. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3898-x. Epub 2016 May 6.
6
Childhood intussusception: ultrasound-guided Hartmann's solution hydrostatic reduction or barium enema reduction?儿童肠套叠:超声引导下哈特曼溶液水压灌肠复位还是钡剂灌肠复位?
J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Jan;32(1):3-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90079-8.
7
Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception with saline: Safe and effective.超声引导下用生理盐水进行肠套叠水压复位:安全有效。
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Sep;50(9):1563-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.046. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
8
Twenty years' experience for reduction of ileocolic intussusceptions by saline enema under sonography control.超声引导下盐水灌肠复位小儿回结肠型肠套叠20年经验
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Jan;51(1):179-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
9
Outcomes in pediatric patients with documented delays between ileocolic intussusception diagnosis and therapeutic enema attempt: evaluation of reduction efficacy and complication rate.有回盲部肠套叠诊断与治疗性灌肠尝试之间时间延迟记录的儿科患者的结局:复位效果和并发症发生率评估。
Emerg Radiol. 2022 Dec;29(6):953-959. doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02079-5. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
10
A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients.小儿肠套叠空气灌肠复位与水压灌肠复位的随机试验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Aug;53(8):1464-1468. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive model integrating deep learning and clinical features based on ultrasound imaging data for surgical intervention in intussusception in children younger than 8 months.基于超声成像数据的深度学习与临床特征相结合的预测模型,用于8个月以下儿童肠套叠的手术干预
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 22;15(8):e097575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097575.
2
Impact of a 6-12-h delay between ileocolic intussusception diagnostic US and fluoroscopic reduction on patients' outcomes.回结肠套叠诊断性超声与透视下复位之间延迟6至12小时对患者预后的影响。
Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Jul;54(8):1294-1301. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-05960-2. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
3
Developing a Nomogram for Predicting Surgical Intervention in Pediatric Intussusception After Pneumatic Reduction: A Multicenter Study from China.
开发用于预测小儿肠套叠空气灌肠复位术后手术干预的列线图:一项来自中国的多中心研究
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 May 24;20:313-323. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S463086. eCollection 2024.
4
Developing and validating a nomogram for early predicting the need for intestinal resection in pediatric intussusception.开发并验证一种用于早期预测小儿肠套叠肠切除需求的列线图。
Front Pediatr. 2024 May 7;12:1409046. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1409046. eCollection 2024.